Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:12 pm

The strike though gives me the win again.

Thanks for playing Rico.

Pick up your complimentary toaster on the way out of the studio...

No, it doesn't.

450 million says I win.
 

R.Suave » 24 Feb 2024, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:13 pm

No, it doesn't.

450 million says I win.

You ain't getting a dime of it anyway Rico... and the State of NY will most likely end up losing money at the end of the day after the SCOTUS rules the fine unconstitutional based on the 8th Amendment, and Trump countersues for the violation of his civil rights.

You do know that every time y'all stupid leftists try to railroad this guy, his base of support grows right?

What are you gonna do when he's polling at 70% heading into the general election, and y'all have to arrest him or assassinate him to keep him out of the WH?

How do you think that's gonna play out?

 

 
 

RebelGator » 24 Feb 2024, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 7:58 pm

We're talking about valuation, not size....Wilford.

Try to stay on focus....you do what focus is, don't you?

That's what the black girls said the basketball team was gonna try to do.

he lied about the size of the apartment which led to an overvaluing of it.  Clearly, a 30K ft2 apartment is worth more than one one third that size.  I guess, in your world, all them trailers in the trailer-park are all about the same size, ain't they Cletis?

RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm

You ain't getting a dime of it anyway Rico... and the State of NY will most likely end up losing money at the end of the day after the SCOTUS rules the fine unconstitutional based on the 8th Amendment, and Trump countersues for the violation of his civil rights.

You do know that every time y'all stupid leftists try to railroad this guy, his base of support grows right?

What are you gonna do when he's polling at 70% heading into the general election, and y'all have to arrest him or assassinate him to keep him out of the WH?

How do you think that's gonna play out?

Stopped caring.

It's pointless...

 

R.Suave » 24 Feb 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:26 pm

Stopped caring.

It's pointless...

The strike through gives me the win again.

Nice...
 

LOL. Funny when Neocons finally realize WASH DC is a CRIMINAL MAFIA.

Yet, they wont really say it out loud.  




 

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm

he lied about the size of the apartment which led to an overvaluing of it.  Clearly, a 30K ft2 apartment is worth more than one one third that size.  I guess, in your world, all them trailers in the trailer-park are all about the same size, ain't they Cletis?

You are a **** idiot.....
tell me how much is the hope diamond worth....
Vs.
How much somebody is willing to pay....

Are you suggesting that the banks didn't do their due diligence ?
there is no crime here except in the minds trying to meddle in a election  that has dire consequences for them if they lose ......
that means ....YOU.
 

R.Suave » 24 Feb 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:26 pm

Stopped caring.

It's pointless...

You are pointless ...
 

The armchair lawyers are out in force in this thread.
Too bad Vegas wasn't representing trump.
He would have shown Letitia James a thing or two.
The best thing about this whole trial?
A black woman **** trump up.
That's gotta sting!

The squealing is music to my ears!

RedheadedStranger » 24 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm

Hillary was supposed to oversee the Great Reset ushered in by the scamdemic, but Trump got in their way.

She was supposed to get two terms as well, which she didn't.

Now they got themselves in a pickle with the senile old man and his idiot VP and are starting to throw everything at the wall, hoping something will stick.

I look for Hillary to ride in or her white horse and save the day soon... and she'll probably have Gavin as her sidekick this time around... and they will "disqualify" Trump in the 11th hour and seize power.

I mean realistically, that the only play the Dems have at this point, and Hillary is even younger than Trump.

That's what I'm wondering about, it's clear that Biden won't be the candidate.. a (senile) elderly man with a bad memory.. they let that out on purpose but meanwhile they're still acting like nothing happened and everything is fine.. so who will they replace him with and when, shouldn't they be preparing the ground by now.. it won't be the Ho, that's for sure, and I can't imagine it will be Hillary, they can't possibly expect to pull that one off.. so who is left, I suspect Big Mike, the Obama's have been suspiciously quiet lately..

 

https://youtu.be/EbAR0BJzQVg
 

Huey » 24 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm

This sums up the Trump verdict and Letitia James:

Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime

Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent. 

“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. He became part of a post-Stalin, short-lived ruling troika until he was executed for treason after Nikita Khrushchev’s coup d’etat in 1953.  Beria targeted “the man” first, then proceeded to find or fabricate a crime. Beria’s modus operandi was to presume the man guilty, and fill in the blanks later. By contrast, under the United States Constitution, there’s a presumption of innocence that emanates from the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments, as set forth in Coffin vs. U.S. (1895).

Read more at: Show me the man and I'll show you the crime - The Oxford Eagle

Let's see. No victim, no one has ever been held accountable under this statute, according to the banks they did go over his assets and adjusted the terms of loans accordingly, and every one involved made lots of money.

Now the camera mugging judge won't allow 30 days. What a **** idiot.

Imagine what they can do to us "normal" people.

“In order to borrow more and at lower rates, defendants submitted blatantly false financial data to the accountants, resulting in fraudulent financial statements,” the judge wrote in his decision. “When confronted at trial with the statements, defendants’ fact and expert witnesses simply denied reality, and defendants failed to accept responsibility or to impose internal controls to prevent future recurrences … Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological.”


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... e-new-york

R.Suave » 25 Feb 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 7:10 am

“In order to borrow more and at lower rates, defendants submitted blatantly false financial data to the accountants, resulting in fraudulent financial statements,” the judge wrote in his decision. “When confronted at trial with the statements, defendants’ fact and expert witnesses simply denied reality, and defendants failed to accept responsibility or to impose internal controls to prevent future recurrences … Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... e-new-york

Opinions of worth are now blatantly false data?

I could be a millionaire if I bought you for what you're worth and sold you for what you think you're worth.

What kind of job do you have, selling worthless life insurance to widows....moron?
 

RebelGator » 25 Feb 2024, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 7:42 am

Opinions of worth are now blatantly false data?

I could be a millionaire if I bought you for what you're worth and sold you for what you think you're worth.

What kind of job do you have, selling worthless life insurance to widows....moron?

You're a **** idiot.


 

Trump doesn't have the cash to pay!
The appeals bondsman is leery of taking him on.
He's in a real pinch now.
I wonder how many migrants trump tower can hold?

R.Suave » 25 Feb 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 7:10 am

“In order to borrow more and at lower rates, defendants submitted blatantly false financial data to the accountants, resulting in fraudulent financial statements,” the judge wrote in his decision. “When confronted at trial with the statements, defendants’ fact and expert witnesses simply denied reality, and defendants failed to accept responsibility or to impose internal controls to prevent future recurrences … Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... e-new-york

Bo banks complained and they also adjusted the loan requirements.  And by the way, got their money back and made millions.

Try again.

Huey » 25 Feb 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 9:36 am

Bo banks complained and they also adjusted the loan requirements.  And by the way, got their money back and made millions.

Try again.

Irrelevant.


Read the statutes.
 

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 8:21 pm

he lied about the size of the apartment which led to an overvaluing of it.  Clearly, a 30K ft2 apartment is worth more than one one third that size.  I guess, in your world, all them trailers in the trailer-park are all about the same size, ain't they Cletis?

A quick internet search should provide a Loan Officer  a way to validate the size and worth of any property that's being used as collateral.
How or why did those loans get approved ?

R.Suave » 25 Feb 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 9:38 am

Irrelevant.

Read the statutes.

NO Victim.

No complaints.

All made money.

First time the statute was used.  

Your TDD is affecting your judgement, as usual.

maineman » 24 Feb 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024, 4:10 pm

sour grapes.

He cheated and he got caught

You and BV are a pair of idiots, the likes of which we haven't seen since Laurel & Hardy!

Both you two and the corrupt judge and prosecutor think you know better than the bank WHO DID THEIR OWN EVALUATION OF THE TRUMP PROPERTIES, lending NO WEIGHT WHATSOEVER to the approximate values that Trump placed on them, who used figures provided to him by his own experts.
And the accuracy of both those figures were proven by the fact that neither the bank or anyone else lost even a dime on the transaction of their loan and the timely repayment that was made by Trump, and the bank even testified that they'd gladly do business with Trump in the future, proving the ignorance of your past statements that nobody will ever give Trump a loan again.

You've both reached the point where you care NOTHING about the truth or the reality of this case, which will certainly be overruled and thrown out by the court of appeals.  As long as you're able to rub your hands together with glee because a guy you have an insane hatred for is the target of their (and your) witch hunt.

Justice be damned because you hate the guy, right?
You're both disgusting cretins who don't deserve to live in a country where justice is truly blind.