Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why Do These Idiots Keep Taking Shots At Cassidy?
Why Do These Idiots Keep Taking Shots At Cassidy?
By R. Suave
25 Feb 2024 7:42 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Feb 2024 12:19 pm
More vague unsupported ****.ConsRule » 26 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Well...she testified she overheard mention of Oath Keepers and Proud Boy at the WH. If she just overheard (her word), that means she wasn't in the meeting. She offered no proof those groups were mentioned. The PPC (and apparently many liberals) took that as fact...without proof.
She also testified about Trump's "attack" of the Secret Service agent because he was angry they wouldn't take him to the Capitol. But her testimony was based on what she was told. When agents were questioned, none knew the reason behind the encounter in the SUV and specific details in their accounts differed. So there was her stating she was told something and nobody actually present provided evidence to support the sketchy details. None of that would be considered admissible in a court of law since those present were telling different versions of what happened.
As for the names of the outlets. Take your pick, I saw or heard reports on CNNLOL, MSNBS, CBS, ABC, NBC, the local Fox affiliate (and the local affiliates of the three networks). I also heard snippets of her testimony on the two local radio stations I frequent, but I don't know who they use as their source. I think it is Fox and CBS radio, but I'm not sure.
Acknowledge your questions were answered.
no, she didn't.She also testified about Trump's "attack" of the Secret Service agent because he was angry they wouldn't take him to the Capitol.
I watched it.
****. It was about a conversation to which she was party.But her testimony was based on what she was told.
****. It's about what Oronato said in the course of the conversation she described.When agents were questioned, none knew the reason behind the encounter in the SUV and specific details in their accounts differed
When invited back to contradict her, Oronato asserted the "fog of war" defense.
****.As for the names of the outlets. Take your pick, I saw or heard
The narrative your offering is riddled with tells.
acknowledge that you're full of ****.Acknowledge your questions were answered.
26 Feb 2024 12:20 pm
It's not my excuse..
It's yours.
26 Feb 2024 12:22 pm
Now you no longer believe your eyes?
26 Feb 2024 12:27 pm
Your excuse is to not answer questions. Thus, the rule.
Narcissists are so **** redundant.
1. More redundant ****.
2. 'Does the rule apply to you?" Hence, redundancy, QED.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 12:29 pm
Was your question answered?Vegas » 26 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Your excuse is to not answer questions. Thus, the rule.
Narcissists are so **** redundant.
1. More redundant ****.
2. 'Does the rule apply to you?" Hence, redundancy, QED.
26 Feb 2024 12:33 pm
She's the same busted up hoe who testified at the Jussie 6th Committee that she heard from a friend who heard from a friend that President Trump choked out two secret service agents, hijacked the Beast then through a jar of Hellmann's mayonnaise at a wall and a bottle of Kraft balsamic vinegar ketchup.RedheadedStranger » 25 Feb 2024, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Cassidy is the same chick that claimed Trump attacked two secret service guys while trying to commandeer an SUV and then threw his cheese burger against the wall at the WH isn't she?
Now she's going on secret missions and taking secret photos with her decoder ring and ****
That gal sure is "connected" and has some colorful stories for being so young and all... I mean, what's not to believe right?
And now she's one of the co-hosts on The View
:lol:
26 Feb 2024 12:39 pm
Right back at you, mother ****. Hypocrite boy.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 12:42 pm
That's irrelevant.
Was your question answered?
26 Feb 2024 12:43 pm
Of course you would say that. It disqualifies your pic, duh.
Prove you answered it the first time around, if you can't, then no, you didn't answer.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 12:43 pm
Warcok » 26 Feb 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ She's the same busted up hoe who testified at the Jussie 6th Committee that she heard from a friend who heard from a friend that President Trump choked out two secret service agents, hijacked the Beast then through a jar of Hellmann's mayonnaise at a wall and a bottle of Kraft balsamic vinegar ketchup.
And now she's one of the co-hosts on The View
she said she heard it from Tony Oronato, Grifty's flunky.that she heard from a friend who heard from a friend that President Trump choked out two secret service agents
26 Feb 2024 12:43 pm
Prove I didn't.Vegas » 26 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course you would say that. It disqualifies your pic, duh.
Prove you answered it the first time around, if you can't, then no, you didn't answer.
26 Feb 2024 12:45 pm
Prove you did.
Evidence is on you, your the one that keeps repeating the ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 12:55 pm
No...if you have doubts about it, get to work.Vegas » 26 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove you did.
Evidence is on you, your the one that keeps repeating the ****.
26 Feb 2024 12:58 pm
Your job to prove it.
Not my problem. Otherwise, you are posting lies...which you already admitted to, per the deal.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 12:59 pm
I have no doubts.Vegas » 26 Feb 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Your job to prove it.
Not my problem. Otherwise, you are posting lies...which you already admitted to, per the deal.
26 Feb 2024 1:02 pm
Then prove it. Your opinion is worthless.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
26 Feb 2024 1:07 pm
Thanks for acknowledging she testified to hearsay
26 Feb 2024 1:14 pm
No, ****.
She truthfully testified to a conversation to which she was party.
Given the opportunity to make a liar of her under oath, Tony took a dive.
26 Feb 2024 1:15 pm
If you're challenging my evidence, it's your job.
26 Feb 2024 1:20 pm
R.Suave » 26 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ More vague unsupported ****.
no, she didn't.
I watched it.
****. It was about a conversation to which she was party.
****. It's about what Oronato said in the course of the conversation she described.
When invited back to contradict her, Oronato asserted the "fog of war" defense.
****.
The narrative your offering is riddled with tells.
acknowledge that you're full of ****.
If you watched the PPC, then you should be able to provide a link to her providing facts (either video of a link to the transcript of her sworn testimony). We'll wait.
Oh..by the way...according to CBS
Tony Ornato, Secret Service official at center of testimony about Trump's actions on Jan. 6, retires - CBS News
Hutchinson testified before the committee that she had met with Ornato and Robert Engel, the Secret Service special agent in charge on Jan. 6, shortly after Trump returned from his address to the White House. According to Hutchinson, during that meeting, Ornato conveyed to her that the president had become "irate" in the car ride back to the White House when he was told that he could not go to the Capitol. He said something to the effect of "'I'm the f***ing president, take me up to the Capitol now,'" Hutchinson recalled.
Notice the parts in bold. She did not witness the incident, her testimony was based on what she was told AND she apparently could not remember what he actually said.
Also, your comment "It's about what Oronato said in the course of the conversation she described." is almost a textbook example of hearsay. And please tell us who the Oronato person is, because I have never heard of him in relation to J6.
Who is online
In total there are 6865 users online :: 2 registered, 14 bots, and 6849 guests
Registered users: ROG62, Cannonpointer
Bots: Baidu, proximic, MQQBrowser, Mediatoolkitbot, Not, Applebot, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot