Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 10:57 am

We can stop right there.

The strike throughs give Huey the win.

You lost another one Rico.

 


 

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 10:59 am

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.

my statement is completely accurate.
 

RedheadedStranger » 27 Feb 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 10:59 am

The strike throughs give Huey the win.

You lost another one Rico.

You aren't a very reliable indicator.

RedheadedStranger » 27 Feb 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 10:52 am

What I'm seeing is that any "source" you agree with is honest and reliable, while any "source" you disagree with is grifty fluff that's not worth the bandwidth... even if they are the SAME "source".

You bitch constantly about people watching FOX News, and then openly admit to watching nearly 8 hours of FOX News a week yourself.

You sir, are an idiot's idiot.

What were the specific sources at issue, **** idiot?

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:02 am

my statement is completely accurate.
 

 

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:05 am

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.

No....really...

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:11 am

No....really...

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.
 

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:15 am

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.

No...no wiggle room..

Really.

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:16 am

No...no wiggle room..

Really.

 

All I know is the next time you mention my sources, or ask for them, or claim they are something other than what is posted it just proves your are a liar.  And not a very good one. The next time you demand I post them I will refuse.  Because this is the 5th time in 2 months I have done so.  

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.
 

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:21 am

All I know is the next time you mention my sources, or ask for them, or claim they are something other than what is posted it just proves your are a liar.  And not a very good one. The next time you demand I post them I will refuse.  Because this is the 5th time in 2 months I have done so.  

No, not really.  I can do this as long as you continue to lie by omission. 

Not until you accept reality and stop lying by omission. Then we can stop.  

Since drudge relies on a host of sources you use you can either stop using them OR you can admit what Drudge actuall does.

As far as your use of strike thru you stop lining out facts.

You are lying by omission. You left out CNN and MSNBC.  Plus, Drudge is simply a site that posts links to articles from many different sources, by those perceived to right and left.  Plus, since your opinion of Drudge is based on what you have been told you don't know that he is anti trump.

You choose Drudge to curate your daily feed out of habit. It enables your Talking Point approach to "issues", and keeps you out of the weeds.

Drudge, FOX and the NYPost are why you are predictably incapable of discussing issues.

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:38 am

You choose Drudge to curate your daily feed out of habit. It enables your Talking Point approach to "issues", and keeps you out of the weeds.

Drudge, FOX and the NYPost are why you are predictably incapable of discussing issues.

LMAO!  You can stop lying now.  

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:40 am

LMAO!  You can stop lying now.

Post my lie, in my words...

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:44 am

Post my lie, in my words...

I have where.  Where  you lied by omission.  ANd whatever that last bit of **** was you posted as to why I use drudge. 

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:49 am

I have where.  Where  you lied by omission.  ANd whatever that last bit of **** was you posted as to why I use drudge.

Another Lie Tell, Tiny.

Squatchman » 25 Feb 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 8:50 am

  Pretty much puts the final nail into the Bjden impeachment inquiry.
But it opens up a bunch of other investigations.
Into trump supporters.

Yes now the DOJ is going to investigate the republican congress 

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:50 am

Another Lie Tell, Tiny.

 

Nope, not at all.  I reposted it numerous times and you lined thru it each time.   I am not obligated to post it yet again, Askholio.  

Huey » 27 Feb 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:55 am

Nope, not at all.  I reposted it numerous times and you lined thru it each time.   I am not obligated to post it yet again, Askholio.

No, you didn't.

You reposted your ****.


 

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 12:18 pm

No, you didn't.

You reposted your ****.


 

 

Run your words.  
 

R.Suave » 27 Feb 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

27 Feb 2024, 11:05 am

What were the specific sources at issue, **** idiot?

Hell, any of them.

I posted a story just a few days ago from the dailycaller that you dismissed as junk because of the "source", but as soon as I pointed out that the dailycaller got it from Vanity Fair you hem and hawed and stuttered and stammered and then ran away.

Vanity Fair is one of your faves. What they post is gospel... right?

nod


 

R.Suave » 25 Feb 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

25 Feb 2024, 8:42 am

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back/story?id=107465387#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17088664205688&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FUS%2Ftrump-white-house-aide-cassidy-hutchinson-pushes-back%2Fstory%3Fid%3D107465387

Former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, through her attorney, responded Friday to one of House Republicans' top impeachment witnesses, Tony Bobulinski, claiming in a letter first obtained by ABC News that comments he made in his recent interview with the House Oversight Committee were "defamatory," with her attorney providing a photo of an alleged encounter between Bobulinski and former White House chief of Staff Mark Meadows that he says refutes Bobulinski's claims about the incident.

(Meadows in the MORON cap, Bobu in ski mask)



Who gets grifted by people this **** stupid?

Cassidy came off the republucan plantation. She will get punished for telling the truth 

​​​​​​​