How does geolocations work based upon what? human intellectual technology dissecting life apart as evolving forward now and never putting it back together in actual time.
Agreed...Beekeeper » 28 Feb 2024, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ And he had to ADMIT he lies about and to "so called" friends. I can assure you, his testimony was of ZERO help and likely more than harmed Fani and Wade. Expect this judge to COMPLETELY remove them both, and that means this "novel theory" Fani used to persecute is going to be dumped by any new DA assigned to it.
"We got him now"......![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think the text messages should be admittedBeekeeper » 28 Feb 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ I imagine, and many LEGAL EAGLES also agree, that the cell data WILL be admitted into the evidence record and this judge is going to make a fairly fast decision to REMOVE Fani and Wade from this case next week. He COULD dismiss all charges, but likely he will reassign it and that DA will REFUSE to persecute Trump and the rest. Add to that, those guilty pleas are likely to end up back in court ALSO demanding their cases ALSO be dismissed and any fines returned. Fani's **** around like a 2-bit whore isn't going to bode well with the Georgia Bar either as I expect them to disbar both of these ****.
Thise LWNJs will be in MELTDOWN MODE when that happens. It's going to be funny as **** watching them try to spin it into cotton candy.
BooRadley » 28 Feb 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ I think the text messages should be admitted
It would clear this up.
It appears numerous lawyers have lied.
If one of those text messages suggest anything romantic then this entire charade should be shut down .
Wouldn't Willis WANT these text messages just to exonerated her and Wade?
Let's see how much they fight them.
If there's nothing on the text messages she'll be exonerated.Beekeeper » 28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Her office has already filed motions to have them EXCLUDED and not because she denies the relationship OR the timeline, but she is claiming that it's not relevant to the filing by the Defense to have her removed.
In other words, she isn't wanting her PERJURY on the stand to be exposed and her removed based on her LIES!! This judge appears to be smart enough to "read between the lines" and LIES her and Wade uttered under oath.
And they want to persecute people for lying???
What I meant was that it was his ex-partner who was testifying.
BooRadley » 28 Feb 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ If there's nothing on the text messages she'll be exonerated.
But she's fighting them...
ExactlyBeekeeper » 28 Feb 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Don't our LWNJs say, "if she is innocent and has nothing to hide, then she won't object to having them released"???
back to unringing a bell again.Skans » 28 Feb 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ What I meant was that it was his ex-partner who was testifying.