I'm not challenging the evidence..Vegas » 27 Feb 2024, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove you did.
Or fork up 20k.
Burden of proof is on you. Your claim. Your job. Period.
ORIGINAL STORY CAME FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES, YOU IDIOTBidencrimefamily » 27 Feb 2024, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Gateway pundit
You can throw that in the trash as junk.

What evidence? That's the whole point. You didn't provide any evidence that you answer questions 'the first time around.'
Victoria JEW-Nuland admitted it before ****. Sir, this is old news.Vegas » 27 Feb 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What evidence? That's the whole point. You didn't provide any evidence that you answer questions 'the first time around.'
If you did, then I would have something to challenge.
I could easily post 20 links. Even YT videos of Whore Nuland nervously admitting it.Vegas » 27 Feb 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What evidence? That's the whole point. You didn't provide any evidence that you answer questions 'the first time around.'
If you did, then I would have something to challenge.
Sumela » 27 Feb 2024, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Victoria JEW-Nuland admitted it before ****. Sir, this is old news.
My apologies sir - I misunderstood. I thought it was about theVegas » 27 Feb 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ My convo with Rico is about something different. I shouldn't deflect from the OP. My bad.
I did...you can't prove otherwise.Vegas » 27 Feb 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What evidence? That's the whole point. You didn't provide any evidence that you answer questions 'the first time around.'
If you did, then I would have something to challenge.
**** obsessed loser.Vegas » 27 Feb 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ My convo with Rico is about something different. I shouldn't deflect from the OP. My bad.
R.Suave » 28 Feb 2024, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ I did...you can't prove otherwise.
Hence, you lose.
Again.
Dumb mother ****. And I already dumbed down where the lie is, I won't do it again.
R.Suave » Yesterday, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 6:16 pm
I don't care why.
Accordingly, I don't click on links you provide if I can't be certain of the source.
Vegas
****. Any excuse for you to hide, you will.
Here I'll prove it again. It's .gov. You still won't play.
Coward.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/tr ... ents-2018/
R.Suave
trumpwhitehouse.org
You are, without question, one of the dumbest **** who ever drew a breath.
How about something from one of these "Independent Journalists" you claim to read?
There is no lie.Vegas » 28 Feb 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Dumb mother ****. And I already dumbed down where the lie is, I won't do it again.
Truer words may never have been spoken.You are, without question, one of the dumbest **** who ever drew a breath.
I have no idea....I won't click on the one redolent with virus.Vegas » 28 Feb 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ 1. So, in your illiterate low IQ mind, those two sources are the same? You just lied again by saying you didn't lie. That's 2 lies now.
2. I didn't read what you quoted. I won't entertain your stalking.
and notifications vs stalking profiles...etc blah blah blah. You know the drill.
R.Suave » 28 Feb 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ I have no idea....I won't click on the one redolent with virus.
The other is in the 1st person.
That is how **** stupid you are..
I didn't read what you quoted. I won't entertain your stalking.Vegas » 28 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ 1. As always, you didn't read the posts. It has nothing to do with my first link, if you read the post, then you would know that.
That's 3 lies now.
2.![]()
![]()
Who **** cares about that ****, you stupid mother ****?
R.Suave » 28 Feb 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't read what you quoted. I won't entertain your stalking.