What would you want a good president to do?

1 4 5 6 7 8 11
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
28 Feb 2024 7:23 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:15 pm » wrote: Refusing to buy their **** for 22 years was a boycott. 

An embargo would have been us blocking their ships from leaving their ports, or preventing them from entering one or more foreign ports.
 It was an all out embargo.
If you were buying Chinese goods during those years  they would have been smuggled in. 

 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:23 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
Monderegal » 28 Feb 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: Tutor with a capital T is actually a dynasty of kings in England. Perhaps you were thinking tutor. They came to power after the War of the Roses.
You're thinking of the Tudor Dynasty. 

They have those slatted houses.

https://empire-s3-production.bobvila.co ... _Style.jpg
 
My favorite english monarch was a Tudor - he royally *** raped a pope. My kinda leader. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
sole
28 Feb 2024 7:25 pm
User avatar
      
27,278 posts
ActionJackson » 28 Feb 2024, 8:11 pm » wrote: Educating you would take a big budget chunk.
 
Society teaching me self deception is a greater good didn't work k-12 so I didn't seek more higher education on how to deny life in plain sight getting a degree in higher educated stupidity.

I did learn how to blend In undetected until i do stuff standing my time equally here.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:27 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Feb 2024, 8:23 pm » wrote:  It was an all out embargo.
If you were buying Chinese goods during those years  they would have been smuggled in.
Were we preventing the chinee from selling to singapore or indonesia? If not, we were not embargoing their ports. We were merely boycotting their products - refusing to do bidniss with them.

And, yes - to evade the boycott would require smuggling, as our ports would not accept chinaman goods. 

Did you read those definitions you posted? We BOYCOTTED China - meaning we refused to do business with them. But to embargo them, we would have to prevent the free movement of their ships.
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:31 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
ActionJackson » 28 Feb 2024, 8:13 pm » wrote: So where will you put them before deportation?  Who is taking them?
I would deport them to sweden, if I DID deport them.

That's where I would deport everyone to - except swedes. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFreOAA2I1A
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:32 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:19 pm » wrote: The guy in your avatar being likened to a puhtahto is the only pResident this CENTURY to launch zero mindless foreign interventions.
the guy with a hard on for Iran
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:32 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: Dude, I'm just JOKING. 

Anyone who knows me realizes those mother **** are going to camps. And digging ditches with star wrenches.
You must be famous.  
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:33 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: I would deport them to sweden, if I DID deport them.

That's where I would deport everyone to - except swedes. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFreOAA2I1A
ok  Image  
 
 
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:33 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
ActionJackson » 28 Feb 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: the guy with a hard on for Iran
Yeah, that was some major neocon dick suck. 

Still less bellicose than his predecessor or the pretender who succeeded him. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:33 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
I'm an institution at the local diner. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
28 Feb 2024 7:34 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:27 pm » wrote: Were we preventing the chinee from selling to singapore or indonesia? If not, we were not embargoing their ports. We were merely boycotting their products - refusing to do bidniss with them.

And, yes - to evade the boycott would require smuggling, as our ports would not accept chinaman goods. 

Did you read those definitions you posted? We BOYCOTTED China - meaning we refused to do business with them. But to embargo them, we would have to prevent the free movement of their ships.
I think we met the 2nd and 3rd definition.
embargo /ĕm-bär′gō/
noun
  1. A government order prohibiting the movement of merchant ships into or out of its ports.
  2. A prohibition by a government on certain or all trade with a foreign nation.
  3. A prohibition; a ban.
    "an embargo on criticism."
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:35 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: Yeah, that was some major neocon dick suck. 

Still less bellicose than his predecessor or the pretender who succeeded him.

Don't forget his hard on for N Korea.
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:36 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: Yeah, that was some major neocon dick suck. 

Still less bellicose than his predecessor or the pretender who succeeded him.

I believe he deployed more troops to Afghan.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:41 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Feb 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: I think we met the 2nd and 3rd definition.
embargo /ĕm-bär′gō/
noun
  1. A government order prohibiting the movement of merchant ships into or out of its ports.
  2. A prohibition by a government on certain or all trade with a foreign nation.
  3. A prohibition; a ban.
    "an embargo on criticism."
Fair enough - the actions of the US government in the postwar period matched the SECONDARY definition of embargo. But it precisely matched the PRIMARY definition of boycott. 

As a result of these facts, any argument as to whether boycott or embargo is the MORE proper, MORE precise term is quite settled in favor of boycott. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:50 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
ActionJackson » 28 Feb 2024, 8:35 pm » wrote: Don't forget his hard on for N Korea.
Absolute poppycock.

He was PILLORIED by the deep state media for his (relative) rapprochement with kim jong du jour. 
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
28 Feb 2024 7:52 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,973 posts
ActionJackson » 28 Feb 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: I believe he deployed more troops to Afghan.
I do not believe he did. And he tried repeatedly to order the troops out of Syria - where they had no legal right to be. 

His generals refused to obey his orders to leave Syria. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
sole
28 Feb 2024 7:53 pm
User avatar
      
27,278 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:41 pm » wrote: Fair enough - the actions of the US government in the postwar period matched the SECONDARY definition of embargo. But it precisely matched the PRIMARY definition of boycott. 

As a result of these facts, any argument as to whether boycott or embargo is the MORE proper, MORE precise term is quite settled in favor of boycott. 
My brain is reading all this and to me boycott is not buying it off the shelves since it is already delivered and paid for at the wholesale level. so the country of origin already was paid before delivery. Franchise retail gets boycotted nd the same products are sold in other franchises, that is domestic practices of a society shooting itself in the foot. people fighting within the me species over which ancestral lineage is top dog just ends up the species eliminates itself eventually. Well 400 generations of doing it, eventually has arrived.

Now embargo wouldn't permit the wholesale trade so no deliver would be sent. No country is going to send their products to anywhere it wasn't paid for upfront.

Except this one. Now what does that say about leaderships not being honest with those elected them to represent their local interests and once elected playing global economics with every other states tax revenues so it is always every other elected peoples representative selling out their electorate and being reelected for decades and sometimes generations like the Kennedy, Bush, Paul, families and that is just the federal levels, so there is sate, county, city, town halls just on the political spectrum.Religion is as much government as politics and both use economics for the same reasons.
User avatar
Sumela
28 Feb 2024 7:55 pm
User avatar
      
21,730 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: I would deport them to sweden, if I DID deport them.

That's where I would deport everyone to - except swedes. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFreOAA2I1A
:lol:  
 
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:58 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:52 pm » wrote: I do not believe he did.
I think he did deploy more to Afghan.  Several thousand?


 
Lol
28 Feb 2024 7:58 pm
Lol
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
914 posts
Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2024, 8:52 pm » wrote: And he tried repeatedly to order the troops out of Syria - where they had no legal right to be. 

His generals refused to obey his orders to leave Syria.
Baloney.

 
 
1 4 5 6 7 8 11

Who is online

In total there are 5650 users online :: 11 registered, 17 bots, and 5622 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, NING, DuckDuckGo, Bolt, LCC, SiteLockSpider, proximic, MQQBrowser, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Applebot, bingbot
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search