Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Closing arguments in the Fati Willis case!
Closing arguments in the Fati Willis case!
By Warcok
1 Mar 2024 12:09 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Mar 2024 1:57 pm
????
They testified under oath
1 Mar 2024 2:15 pm
1 Mar 2024 2:28 pm
When Democrats are involved? We all know Democrat Judges will never hold a Democrat to the law.Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ How much you want to bet they don't get perjury charges.
1 Mar 2024 2:34 pm
So... what's happening?
I'm following the trial through this thread!
C'mon guys!
I'm following the trial through this thread!
C'mon guys!
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Mar 2024 2:38 pm
You want to bet.Skans » 01 Mar 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ When Democrats are involved? We all know Democrat Judges will never hold a Democrat to the law.
Or are you scared to do so.
1 Mar 2024 2:38 pm
speculation is not proof.RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ So... what's happening?
I'm following the trial through this thread!
C'mon guys!
Especially in the court of law.
1 Mar 2024 2:41 pm
If I wanted to hear stupid **** I would have nust squeezed your head, liar.Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ speculation is not proof.
Especially in the court of law.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Mar 2024 2:42 pm
No having receipts for a trip is not proof that a payment was made to Wade.RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If I wanted to hear stupid **** I would have nust squeezed your head, liar.
Which is not enoygh in the court of law.
The burden is proof.
1 Mar 2024 2:43 pm
Tell that to the IRSBidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No having receipts for a trip is not proof that a payment was made to Wade.
Which is not enoygh in the court of law.
The burden is proof.
1 Mar 2024 2:46 pm
This isn't the IRS dummies.
1 Mar 2024 2:47 pm
Didn't you hear?Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No having receipts for a trip is not proof that a payment was made to Wade.
Which is not enoygh in the court of law.
The burden is proof.
The Democrats changed that to "guilty until proven innocent" now.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Mar 2024 2:49 pm
The state of Georgia will get their chance to prove Trump in fact on his call to Georgia officials broke the law.RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Didn't you hear?
The Democrats changed that to "guilty until proven innocent" now.
Nothing has change in that respect.
1 Mar 2024 3:07 pm
Ooops..please excuse me....
.I should have said "District Attorney Monkey Girl". and not "Judge Monkey Girl".
1 Mar 2024 3:07 pm
So, Trump's lawyers make a better argument. They are more conversant with the Judge. I watched a little of the DA's argument - young guy who stammers a lot. He's hard to listen to. I think what he's trying to say is that Trump's lawyers didn't prove that the cash was used for anything wrong. He's trying to say that Willis should get away with saying "cash, cash cash", even though she has no receipts or other documents to back up what the cash was spent on. That's a pretty **** position. If the judge buys that, then he's definitely in the tank for Biden.
1 Mar 2024 3:19 pm
I would never bet that a Democrat judge would do the right thing. Quite the opposite, in fact. Do you take me for a sucker? Think again.
1 Mar 2024 3:28 pm
And I agree the same is true for republucan judges and prosecutors.Skans » 01 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I would never bet that a Democrat judge would do the right thing. Quite the opposite, in fact. Do you take me for a sucker? Think again.
You shown that you can't see this but anything but political.
And have shown Republicans can't be trusted with judging a case.
1 Mar 2024 3:32 pm
The fact that Willis and Wade will not be marched down the street to ger disbarred for lying under oath like rudy guiliniani had been it's very telling here.
1 Mar 2024 3:32 pm
DA's office that's defending Fati *** is absolutely incompetent. Guys stuttering, sounds nervous as hell, has no defense. 
1 Mar 2024 3:32 pm
The difference is.....you're a dumb ***.Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ And I agree the same is true for republucan judges and prosecutors.
You shown that you can't see this but anything but political.
And have shown Republicans can't be trusted with judging a case.
1 Mar 2024 3:38 pm
They were under oath you friggin dopeBidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ And what's your point.
Lawyers can say anything in trial.
They are not under oath.
Who is online
In total there are 4298 users online :: 12 registered, 13 bots, and 4273 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Bolt, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, Applebot, CriteoBot, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7, DuckDuckBot, bingbot