Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Boom no kniedge of the relationship or living together.
Like the Trump lawyer had said.
Damning.
Well, we are talking about specific examples right in front of us where it is clear as a bell that Democrats are engaging in outrageous and ridiculous lawfare against a Presidential Candidate. Republicans have not done that - you can't point to any example at all.Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ And I agree the same is true for republucan judges and prosecutors.
You shown that you can't see this but anything but political.
And have shown Republicans can't be trusted with judging a case.
Your delusions are besides the point.Skans » 01 Mar 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, we are talking about specific examples right in front of us where it is clear as a bell that Democrats are engaging in outrageous and ridiculous lawfare against a Presidential Candidate. Republicans have not done that - you can't point to any example at all.
Well after years of you guys doing it to others it's about time the tables are turned.Skans » 01 Mar 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, we are talking about specific examples right in front of us where it is clear as a bell that Democrats are engaging in outrageous and ridiculous lawfare against a Presidential Candidate. Republicans have not done that - you can't point to any example at all.
GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Mar 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ $9200 worth of cocaine is no match for those massive 650 CFM, "Spread Bore / Double Pumper" nostrils of hers.
You have no clue what you're discussingBidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No having receipts for a trip is not proof that a payment was made to Wade.
Which is not enoygh in the court of law.
The burden is proof.
So you're saying that in a trial where the DEFENSE used is "I paid in cash" is an affirmative defense and one that must be accepted no matter what??Bidencrimefamily » 01 Mar 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No having receipts for a trip is not proof that a payment was made to Wade.
Which is not enoygh in the court of law.
The burden is proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXRblykmgMIGHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑Rochester was a fairly popular Negro name....huh...?