TRAFFIC COURT LAWYER TRIES TO OVERULE AN 8-0 ILLINOIS STATE ELECTION BOARD RULING

User avatar
By righteous
1 Mar 2024 8:41 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 7:53 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BIGLIPSSINKSHIPS » 02 Mar 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: You can't even match what he said.  lol
Not an example I'm aching to emulate.
Harper Lee
2 Mar 2024 7:53 am
      
8,764 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: Where's your citation?
Can you just show us the court Trump was found guilty in?

I really wanted to pull up his testimony
 
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 7:58 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: Can you just show us the court Trump was found guilty in?

I really wanted to pull up his testimony
Anderson v. Griswold

Colorado.

Grifty didn't show.


Where is your citation, Lying Hole?
Harper Lee
2 Mar 2024 8:22 am
      
8,764 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: Anderson v. Griswold

Colorado.

Grifty didn't show.

Where is your citation, Lying Hole?
In a case brought by a group of Colorado electors, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado considered whether former President Donald J. Trump could appear on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot. The electors claimed that Trump was disqualified under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution from holding office. The district court found that Trump had engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to the presidency.
Harper Lee
2 Mar 2024 8:24 am
      
8,764 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: Anderson v. Griswold

Colorado.

Grifty didn't show.

Where is your citation, Lying Hole?
He didn't show?
Was there a trial?

 
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 8:25 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: In a case brought by a group of Colorado electors, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado considered whether former President Donald J. Trump could appear on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot. The electors claimed that Trump was disqualified under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution from holding office. The district court found that Trump had engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to the presidency.
Now read on about the result of Grifty's appeal.
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 8:25 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: He didn't show?
Was there a trial?
You've been answered, Hole.
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 8:26 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: He didn't show?
Was there a trial?
Time for your citation, Hole.
Harper Lee
2 Mar 2024 8:28 am
      
8,764 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: You've been answered, Hole.
Well..
I guess that's it

Trump can't run for president in Colorado!
 
User avatar
righteous
2 Mar 2024 8:33 am
User avatar
      
9,464 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: Consistent with the findings of the Colorado courts.

THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR A CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 3

**** idiot.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
" left-wing activist group Free Speech for People"   which filed the same complaint in Michigan.
:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
Officials there ruled against removing Trump from the ballot.

PUT THE CORK BACK IN YOUR ***, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***, BEFORE YOU GET *** RIPPED SOME MORE

LEFTISTS LIKE TO USE DUMB *** WITH NO EXPERIENCE TO TRY CASES AGAINST TRUMP
FUNNY ****
THEY BANK ON SOROS JUDGES TO WORK WONDERS FOR THEM

DUMB *** JEW BOY
  
 
User avatar
Vegas
2 Mar 2024 8:39 am
User avatar
Giant Slayer
15,581 posts

More of Squatchman's predictable posts. No intelligent thoughts. 
Retarded Horse's view on women.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
  • I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
  • I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
  • PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993
User avatar
Vegas
2 Mar 2024 8:41 am
User avatar
Giant Slayer
15,581 posts
righteous » 02 Mar 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
" left-wing activist group Free Speech for People"   which filed the same complaint in Michigan.
Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image  
Officials there ruled against removing Trump from the ballot.

PUT THE CORK BACK IN YOUR ***, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***, BEFORE YOU GET *** RIPPED SOME MORE

LEFTISTS LIKE TO USE DUMB *** WITH NO EXPERIENCE TO TRY CASES AGAINST TRUMP
FUNNY ****
THEY BANK ON SOROS JUDGES TO WORK WONDERS FOR THEM

DUMB *** JEW BOY
He is one dumb S.O.B. This is the part where he will either belt you with 60k questions/demands or continue to call you a **** idiot.  Image  



And as you already know, he doesn't answer questions (at least not the first time; you will need to wait about 6 years), so I wouldn't bother with asking him anything.

 
Retarded Horse's view on women.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
  • I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
  • I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
  • PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 8:46 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: Well..
I guess that's it

Trump can't run for president in Colorado!

where is your citation, Lying Hole?
User avatar
*Beekeeper
2 Mar 2024 8:48 am
User avatar
      
8,319 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: Consistent with the findings of the Colorado courts.

THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR A CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 3

**** idiot.

So what you are saying is that there is NO CONVICTION REQUIRED to incarcerate or execute someone under our Constitution.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Vegas
2 Mar 2024 8:50 am
User avatar
Giant Slayer
15,581 posts
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: where is your citation, Lying Hole?

**** your questions. 


I bet you haven't answered any yet...the first time. 

Yeah, that's what I thought. Thus, **** your questions. 
Retarded Horse's view on women.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
  • I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
  • I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
  • PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993
Harper Lee
2 Mar 2024 8:51 am
      
8,764 posts
Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: So what you are saying is that there is NO CONVICTION REQUIRED to incarcerate or execute someone under our Constitution.
Exactly...

The party of "Trump is a threat to democracy" wants to remove him from the ballot even if he's not even charged or convicted of a crime .

Of course it's Colorado...
Not the United States or the Dept of Justice.

Odd how the Supreme Court asked if that would mean a Republican can remove a Democrat for any reason regardless of a charge or conviction and the Colorado lawyer appeared stuck on what to say....


 
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 8:59 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: So what you are saying is that there is NO CONVICTION REQUIRED to incarcerate or execute someone under our Constitution.
He isn't under threat of either.

It was a Civil procedure.

You're a **** moron.
 
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 9:00 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: Exactly...

The party of "Trump is a threat to democracy" wants to remove him from the ballot even if he's not even charged or convicted of a crime .

Of course it's Colorado...
Not the United States or the Dept of Justice.

Odd how the Supreme Court asked if that would mean a Republican can remove a Democrat for any reason regardless of a charge or conviction and the Colorado lawyer appeared stuck on what to say....
Citation?
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 9:02 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: **** your questions. 

I bet you haven't answered any yet...the first time. 

Yeah, that's what I thought. Thus, **** your questions.
Post the rule.

Post your stipulation.

Or get staplin'.
 
R. Suave
2 Mar 2024 9:03 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
righteous » 02 Mar 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
" left-wing activist group Free Speech for People"   which filed the same complaint in Michigan.
Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image   Image  
Officials there ruled against removing Trump from the ballot.

PUT THE CORK BACK IN YOUR ***, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***, BEFORE YOU GET *** RIPPED SOME MORE

LEFTISTS LIKE TO USE DUMB *** WITH NO EXPERIENCE TO TRY CASES AGAINST TRUMP
FUNNY ****
THEY BANK ON SOROS JUDGES TO WORK WONDERS FOR THEM

DUMB *** JEW BOY
"Officials"?

This is how **** stupid you are.
 
1 2 3 4 5

Who is online

In total there are 4377 users online :: 13 registered, 14 bots, and 4350 guests
Bots: Bolt, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, NING, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search