Not an example I'm aching to emulate.
Can you just show us the court Trump was found guilty in?
Anderson v. GriswoldBooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Can you just show us the court Trump was found guilty in?
I really wanted to pull up his testimony
In a case brought by a group of Colorado electors, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado considered whether former President Donald J. Trump could appear on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot. The electors claimed that Trump was disqualified under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution from holding office. The district court found that Trump had engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to the presidency.R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Anderson v. Griswold
Colorado.
Grifty didn't show.
Where is your citation, Lying Hole?
He didn't show?R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Anderson v. Griswold
Colorado.
Grifty didn't show.
Where is your citation, Lying Hole?
Now read on about the result of Grifty's appeal.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ In a case brought by a group of Colorado electors, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado considered whether former President Donald J. Trump could appear on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot. The electors claimed that Trump was disqualified under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection against the U.S. Constitution from holding office. The district court found that Trump had engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, but concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to the presidency.
You've been answered, Hole.
Time for your citation, Hole.
Well..
BROUGHT TO YOU BY:R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ Consistent with the findings of the Colorado courts.
THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR A CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 3
**** idiot.
He is one dumb S.O.B. This is the part where he will either belt you with 60k questions/demands or continue to call you a **** idiot.righteous » 02 Mar 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
" left-wing activist group Free Speech for People" which filed the same complaint in Michigan.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Officials there ruled against removing Trump from the ballot.
PUT THE CORK BACK IN YOUR ***, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***, BEFORE YOU GET *** RIPPED SOME MORE
LEFTISTS LIKE TO USE DUMB *** WITH NO EXPERIENCE TO TRY CASES AGAINST TRUMP
FUNNY ****
THEY BANK ON SOROS JUDGES TO WORK WONDERS FOR THEM
DUMB *** JEW BOY
BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Well..
I guess that's it
Trump can't run for president in Colorado!
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ Consistent with the findings of the Colorado courts.
THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR A CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 3
**** idiot.
Exactly...Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ So what you are saying is that there is NO CONVICTION REQUIRED to incarcerate or execute someone under our Constitution.
He isn't under threat of either.Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ So what you are saying is that there is NO CONVICTION REQUIRED to incarcerate or execute someone under our Constitution.
Citation?BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Exactly...
The party of "Trump is a threat to democracy" wants to remove him from the ballot even if he's not even charged or convicted of a crime .
Of course it's Colorado...
Not the United States or the Dept of Justice.
Odd how the Supreme Court asked if that would mean a Republican can remove a Democrat for any reason regardless of a charge or conviction and the Colorado lawyer appeared stuck on what to say....
Post the rule.Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ **** your questions.
I bet you haven't answered any yet...the first time.
Yeah, that's what I thought. Thus, **** your questions.
"Officials"?righteous » 02 Mar 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
" left-wing activist group Free Speech for People" which filed the same complaint in Michigan.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Officials there ruled against removing Trump from the ballot.
PUT THE CORK BACK IN YOUR ***, ANTIFA EGGPLANT ***, BEFORE YOU GET *** RIPPED SOME MORE
LEFTISTS LIKE TO USE DUMB *** WITH NO EXPERIENCE TO TRY CASES AGAINST TRUMP
FUNNY ****
THEY BANK ON SOROS JUDGES TO WORK WONDERS FOR THEM
DUMB *** JEW BOY