Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:02 am

Post the rule.

Post your stipulation.

Or get staplin'.

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 



 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:02 am

Post the rule.

Post your stipulation.

Or get staplin'.

He's a needy little bitch isn't he?
Like Boohoo.

 

Squatchman » 02 Mar 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:06 am

He's a needy little bitch isn't he?
Like Boohoo.

A lot of demands and rules...

They just consider themselves immune...

Typical MAGAts..
 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:11 am

A lot of demands and rules...

They just consider themselves immune...

Typical MAGAts..

  He's funny.
Like all trump supporters they have in inflated sense of worth.
But as the country already knows they're nothing but scum.

Well the right wing is kinda all about the constitution.

Till a republican goes against the constitution.

They are sometimes constitutionists


 

Squatchman » 02 Mar 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:13 am

  He's funny.
Like all trump supporters they have in inflated sense of worth.
But as the country already knows they're nothing but scum.

It must be difficult being such a dull narcissist. You demand attention, but offer no reason to receive it...

All of  @Vegas ' threads suck.

Without exception.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 9:59 am

He isn't under threat of either.

It was a Civil procedure.

You're a **** moron.

So, if the CRIME of INSURRECTION is part of the US Code, then that means a CONVICTION is necessary to DISQUALIFY someone from the ballot!!

And that happens to be the case here. AND there has been NO DUE PROCESS in any civil proceeding for Trump, so that doesn't fly either, ****!!

!!

YOU GOT **** OVER AGAIN by your OWN LIES AND HATE!!!

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:17 am

It must be difficult being such a dull narcissist. You demand attention, but offer no reason to receive it...

 

And the projections continues. 

All of  @Vegas ' threads suck.

Without exception.

And the cherry picking continues. 


 

Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am

So, if the CRIME of INSURRECTION is part of the US Code, then that means a CONVICTION is necessary to DISQUALIFY someone from the ballot!!

And that happens to be the case here. AND there has been NO DUE PROCESS in any civil proceeding for Trump, so that doesn't fly either, ****!!

!!

YOU GOT **** OVER AGAIN by your OWN LIES AND HATE!!!

No, stupid ****.

Read section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
 

Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am

 AND there has been NO DUE PROCESS in any civil proceeding for Trump, 
 

            
    
 

Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:19 am

And the projections continues. 

And the cherry picking continues.

This is how **** stupid this **** is.

All of  @Vegas ' threads suck. Without exception

And the cherry picking continues.

Can't beat this Stupid.
 
 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:23 am

This is how **** stupid this **** is.

All of  @Vegas ' threads suck. Without exception

Can't beat this Stupid.

I would say to prove it, but we both know that you will evade. So I won't even bother. 


1. "Disprove it." 
As always, the stupid asshole can't understand that he made the claim, thus it's his job to prove. 

Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:25 am

I would say to prove it, but we both know that you will evade. So I won't even bother. 

1. "Disprove it." 
As always, the stupid asshole can't understand that he made the claim, thus it's his job to prove.

he made the claim, thus it's his job to prove. 

Post the rule and your stipulation.

Assuming this rule applies to you.

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:30 am

Post the rule and your stipulation.

Assuming this rule applies to you.

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 

Why do you continue to pretend that you don't know the answer to that? Oh yeah, because you are predictable and can't think of anything else, so you just repost ****. 

Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:35 am

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 

Why do you continue to pretend that you don't know the answer to that? Oh yeah, because you are predictable and can't think of anything else, so you just repost ****.

A common sign of people with narcissism is the belief that they are superior to others and deserve special treatment. They believe that others should be obedient to their wishes and that the rules don't apply to them. Another common trait of narcissism is manipulative or controlling behavior.

Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:35 am

Rule, idiot. Or 3k greenies. 

Why do you continue to pretend that you don't know the answer to that? Oh yeah, because you are predictable and can't think of anything else, so you just repost ****.

Follow the law unless Trump breaks it. 

You're a disgrace. 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:37 am

A common sign of people with narcissism is the belief that they are superior to others and deserve special treatment. They believe that others should be obedient to their wishes and that the rules don't apply to them. Another common trait of narcissism is manipulative or controlling behavior.

What was my answer to that question? Go on, let's see if you have the balls to admit it. 

I'll repost it, but I want to see if you have the balls first. And go....

Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am

What was my answer to that question? Go on, let's see if you have the balls to admit it. 

I'll repost it, but I want to see if you have the balls first. And go....

The law matters till Trump breaks it. 

Then its ok. 
 

R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:20 am

No, stupid ****.

Read section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Let me SHOW YOU HOW **** STUPID AND WRONG YOU ARE, ****!!

Section 1, 14th AMENDMENT....

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

You CAN'T UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DENY SOMEONE PRIVILEGES OR RIGHTS without DUE PROCESS OF LAW!! 

Show me where Trump was given DUE PROCESS under the law that he engaged in INSURRECTION!! Even that is REQUIRED under the 14th Amendment regardless of what section you are looking at!!

NOW, GO **** YOURSELF AND SHUT THE **** UP ****!! The SCOTUS is about to give you an EDUCATION on how that 14th Amendement actually works!!

           

Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am

The law matters till Trump breaks it. 

Then its ok.

Deflecting to Trump again. TDS ^^^