Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
TRAFFIC COURT LAWYER TRIES TO OVERULE AN 8-0 ILLINOIS STATE ELECTION BOARD RULING
TRAFFIC COURT LAWYER TRIES TO OVERULE AN 8-0 ILLINOIS STATE ELECTION BOARD RULING
By righteous
1 Mar 2024 8:41 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Mar 2024 9:40 am
You keep asking questions in spite of your rule about questions.Vegas » 02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ What was my answer to that question? Go on, let's see if you have the balls to admit it.
I'll repost it, but I want to see if you have the balls first. And go....
I suspect that, even as dull as you are, you're a frustrated narcissist.
2 Mar 2024 9:41 am
They are all law and order till Trump breaks the law.R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ You keep asking questions in spite of your rule aboit questions.
I suspect that, even as dull as you are, you're a frustrated narcissist.
2 Mar 2024 9:41 am
The relevant section is Section 3.Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ Let me SHOW YOU HOW **** STUPID AND WRONG YOU ARE, ****!!
Section 1, 14th AMENDMENT....
You CAN'T UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DENY SOMEONE PRIVILEGES OR RIGHTS without DUE PROCESS OF LAW!!
Show me where Trump was given DUE PROCESS under the law that he engaged in INSURRECTION!! Even that is REQUIRED under the 14th Amendment regardless of what section you are looking at!!
NOW, GO **** YOURSELF AND SHUT THE **** UP ****!! The SCOTUS is about to give you an EDUCATION on how that 14th Amendement actually works!!
Try that.
2 Mar 2024 9:42 am
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ You keep asking questions in spite of your rule about questions.
I suspect that, even as dull as you are, you're a frustrated narcissist.
What was my **** answer? Now coward.
I won't repost the answer until you admit it first.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Mar 2024 9:47 am
So you can show us where Congress issued a JOINT RESOLUTION or the COURTS have had a DUE PROCESS hearing and found UNEQUIVOCABLY that an insurrection happened on Jan 6th.and that Donald Trump participated.
GO!!!
OTHERWISE, you have no consensus on the DEFINITION of "insurrection" and anyone can pull out of their *** what they think is one. OR can maje a declaration that someone participated without ANY DUE PROCESS to that claim!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Mar 2024 9:47 am
Even right wingers are saying Trump broke the laws.Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ So you can show us where Congress issued a JOINT RESOLUTION or the COURTS have had a DUE PROCESS hearing and found UNEQUIVOCABLY that an insurrection happened on Jan 6th.and that Donald Trump participated.
GO!!!
OTHERWISE, you have no consensus on the DEFINITION of "insurrection" and anyone can pull out of their *** what they think is one. OR can maje a declaration that someone participated without ANY DUE PROCESS to that claim!!
2 Mar 2024 9:50 am
righteous » 01 Mar 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Late last month, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Tracie R. Porter decided in all her legal wisdom to ban Donald Trump from the Illinois primary ballot because he is supposedly an “insurrectionist” under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, even though he has neither been convicted nor even charged with such a crime.
Judge Who Removed Trump from Ballot Was Originally Working in Traffic Court (westernjournal.com)
Notice that the totally ridiculous "Insurrection Narrative" has been swallowed "hook, line and sinker" by the most totally ridiculous members of our society.
2 Mar 2024 10:03 am
2 Mar 2024 10:23 am
Really?Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ You follow the laws or you go to jail.
Very simple people.
Like committing perjury?
2 Mar 2024 10:39 am
Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Even right wingers are saying Trump broke the laws.
What?? 2? 3?? our of THOUSANDS OR MILLIONS??
YOU LOST, ***-SUCK!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Mar 2024 11:38 am
Will you stop clinging to this 'section 3 doesn't state' drivel. Section 3 doesn't require a citation either.
Insurrection is a crime - until someone is at least charged and tried with it in a criminal sense, there was no insurrection for anyone to answer for, under any circumstances. You can't just stack **** to any height you like. The FBI has said there was no insurrection - why is their word, not the one you've chosen to adhere to instead of the opinions of an appellate court in Dickwater, wherever? How is the word of the FBI, not the final word for you? I suggest it's not the final word, because it hasn't been determined through serious legal rigour that the FBI is right in their statement - first that there wasn't an insurrection, and secondly that Trump wasn't guilty. So it's dismissible as not being established
Well, it cuts both ways - there's been no legal rigour applied here, period, and so it remains undetermined. There's only one sane direction - the one that resonates with the age-old concept of innocent until proven guilty. There wasn't an insurrection until it's been determined through reasonable legal rigour that such a thing took place. Equally, you can't hold Trump guilty of taking part in an insurrection until it's been determined one took place, and that he took part. It has to work this way, or there'll be no one left on the damn ballot to vote for. Insurrection is a crime, put people on trial for it or shut up smearing people's good names
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.
2 Mar 2024 11:41 am
Who?Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Even right wingers are saying Trump broke the laws.
2 Mar 2024 12:21 pm
JustinSane » 02 Mar 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Will you stop clinging to this 'section 3 doesn't state' drivel. Section 3 doesn't require a citation either.
Insurrection is a crime - until someone is at least charged and tried with it in a criminal sense, there was no insurrection for anyone to answer for, under any circumstances. You can't just stack **** to any height you like. The FBI has said there was no insurrection - why is their word, not the one you've chosen to adhere to instead of the opinions of an appellate court in Dickwater, wherever? How is the word of the FBI, not the final word for you? I suggest it's not the final word, because it hasn't been determined through serious legal rigour that the FBI is right in their statement - first that there wasn't an insurrection, and secondly that Trump wasn't guilty. So it's dismissible as not being established
Well, it cuts both ways - there's been no legal rigour applied here, period, and so it remains undetermined. There's only one sane direction - the one that resonates with the age-old concept of innocent until proven guilty. There wasn't an insurrection until it's been determined through reasonable legal rigour that such a thing took place. Equally, you can't hold Trump guilty of taking part in an insurrection until it's been determined one took place, and that he took part. It has to work this way, or there'll be no one left on the damn ballot to vote for. Insurrection is a crime, put people on trial for it or shut up smearing people's good names
Why?Will you stop clinging to this 'section 3 doesn't state' drivel.
It's what is at issue.
You're off to a strong start.Section 3 doesn't require a citation either.
I don't give a **** about your fee-fees.Insurrection is a crime - until someone is at least charged and tried with it in a criminal sense, there was no insurrection for anyone to answer for, under any circumstances.
2 Mar 2024 12:42 pm
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑
Why?
It's what is at issue.
You're off to a strong start.
I don't give a **** about your fee-fees.
Where, in ANY COURT OF LAW, has Trump been charged with the crime of INSURRECTION?? One where he MUST answer to that crime with DUE PROCESS!!
Because you THINK that isn't necessary means JACK **** in the LEGAL WORLD!!!
Boom. YOU LOSE, ****!! PERIOD!!
See, how EASY this is??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Mar 2024 12:45 pm
Disqualification under Section 3 doesn't require conviction.Beekeeper » 02 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Where, in ANY COURT OF LAW, has Trump been charged with the crime of INSURRECTION?? One where he MUST answer to that crime with DUE PROCESS!!
Because you THINK that isn't necessary means JACK **** in the LEGAL WORLD!!!
Boom. YOU LOSE, ****!! PERIOD!!
See, how EASY this is??
So you can stop demanding one now.
2 Mar 2024 12:47 pm
Well...R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Disqualification under Section 3 doesn't require conviction.
So you can stop demanding one now.
I guess you know more then the Supreme Court..
Trump is off the ballot
2 Mar 2024 12:49 pm
That is the current position of the highest court in Colorado.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Well...
I guess you know more then the Supreme Court..
Trump is off the ballot
2 Mar 2024 12:56 pm
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Disqualification under Section 3 doesn't require conviction.
So you can stop demanding one now.
Section 1 REQUIRES DUE PROCESS of LAW, ****!! PERIOD!!
Can you stop pretending that Section 3 doesn't require DUE PROCESS!!!
**** OFF, PISSWAD!! Little *** like you need to keep eating your rat turds and thinking they make you smart.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Mar 2024 12:58 pm
R.Suave » 02 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ That is the current position of the highest court in Colorado.
Wait for the SCOTUS to kick you in the BALLS roughly 12 times really hard, **** FACE!!
Did you swallow another load of your boyfriends cum this morning and think that makes you spicy??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Mar 2024 1:11 pm
State Election Board, dumb **** Jew
Who is online
In total there are 4377 users online :: 13 registered, 14 bots, and 4350 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey
Bots: Bolt, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, NING, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot