Liberal Forum

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

LowIQTrash » 02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

combinations existing until eroded or decomposed since arrival. You cannot defeat perpetual balancing since it arrives from natural perpetual motion of combined moments universally going forward now within details never duplicating contracting combinations so far.

Basic thermodynamic principles you principal deniers of self evident displacement.

LowIQTrash » 02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

Successfully "treating" cancer doesn't mean they know the cause.

That is a tiny hole in your damning logic.

Just taking your post at face value.

Toxins of self deception + Viruses of social consensus = the cancer of reasonable doubt life is self evident as evolving here now.

Jesus Christ All you sad sacks want to talk about is despair. What a cheerfull group. I don't care what I feel like, when anybody asks I always say " I'm Fine "

radiation and/or chemicals cause mutation of virus cells. when viruses become a cancer virus, do not expose it to radiation nor chemicals. expose to another virus it can bond with. this modifies the virus that has mutated into an cancer virus. this is being done in china. barred in usa. usa capitalism wins.

PhiloBeddo » 02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am

Jesus Christ All you sad sacks want to talk about is despair. What a cheerfull group. I don't care what I feel like, when anybody asks I always say " I'm Fine "

I respond "Faking it until I make it." I am not allowed to be honest about life in any reality.

LowIQTrash » 02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

.We are so inundated with toxic exposures that it's a miracle we have an average lifespan of 80...!!
Read the labels of all processed foods and it looks like the contents of a chemistry set.
Even people who lived the most "natural lives" in the Amazon rain forest could get cancer if they lived long enough...right...?
Prevention is the best "cure"...so it seems that improving / maintaining our immune system response is the strategy that we have some control of.
It's my understanding we have "Watch Dog Cells" that specialize in detecting defective cells  and they gobble them up before the defective cells can duplicate.
We need to be able have our immune systems tested [exposed to cancer cells  in a petri dish] to see what sort of supplements might be required to pass the test.
Years ago I was happy to hear that "sharks don't get cancer so let's study them". They will reveal the secret.
Well that ended up being proven untrue. 
Sharks DO get cancer too.

 
 

PhiloBeddo » 02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am

Jesus Christ All you sad sacks want to talk about is despair. What a cheerfull group. I don't care what I feel like, when anybody asks I always say " I'm Fine "

America is in despair.  
You are Biden, Biden is you.
 

LowIQTrash » 02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

Also seems there should be some simple way to clear plaque from arteries.  How hard could it be?

BUT....MUCH MUCH more $$$$$$$$$$ in not doing so.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am

…Prevention is the best "cure"...so it seems that improving / maintaining our immune system response is the strategy that we have some control of…
 

THIS

Start seeing an alternative/naturalpathic MD and get the hell away from the untrained knucklehead MDs that make up most of the medical establishment….these bastards will only slowly kill you.

DeezerShoove » 02 Mar 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 8:51 am

Successfully "treating" cancer doesn't mean they know the cause.

That is a tiny hole in your damning logic.

Just taking your post at face value.

Anthropologists can look at the teeth and the bones and detect diabetes in ancient people.
I wonder what sort of evidence of cancer there is from antiquity..?
There are natural poisons that even the earliest people could have been in contact with, so only God knows how long cancer has been with us.
A couple of my most toxic exposures as a youngster...
Chewing little hunks of pure "road tar" that the Road Crew was spreading out on our street....
Being so drunk that I smoked the filter end of a cigarette.....  

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm

Anthropologists can look at the teeth and the bones and detect diabetes in ancient people.
I wonder what sort of evidence of cancer there is from antiquity..?
There are natural poisons that even the earliest people could have been in contact with, so only God knows how long cancer has been with us.
A couple of my most toxic exposures as a youngster...
Chewing little hunks of pure "road tar" that the Road Crew was spreading out on our street....
Being so drunk that I smoked the filter end of a cigarette.....

Fat people and alcoholics probably aren't a new invention either.

DeezerShoove » 02 Mar 2024, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 9:58 pm

Fat people and alcoholics probably aren't a new invention either.

Yep....and the way the story goes diabetes wasn't very common back in the day when people had a hard time getting enough to eat.
Here is a factoid about how prehistoric cancer can be detected with  Anthropology.....https://www.sciencenews.org/article/old ... tree-found

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 10:06 pm

Yep....and the way the story goes diabetes wasn't very common back in the day when people had a hard time getting enough to eat.
Here is a factoid about how prehistoric cancer can be detected with  Anthropology.....https://www.sciencenews.org/article/old ... tree-found

But there was gout and its nickname was "rich man's disease" because of diet.

But I'll grant you that what we consider fat today was different less than a century ago.
 

GHETTO BLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm

Anthropologists can look at the teeth and the bones and detect diabetes in ancient people.
I wonder what sort of evidence of cancer there is from antiquity..?
There are natural poisons that even the earliest people could have been in contact with, so only God knows how long cancer has been with us.
A couple of my most toxic exposures as a youngster...
Chewing little hunks of pure "road tar" that the Road Crew was spreading out on our street....
Being so drunk that I smoked the filter end of a cigarette..... :rofl:  

Personal intellect comes from brain comparing past experiences used with evolving in current situations in a body never same results twice changing form shaped since a unique fertilized cell. Time is the personal cycle you are in all three stages of life like all life is supported by 3 kinds of molecular elements combined to sustain this universal location your time is cycled within the cycle of this planet being specifically here, now.

Simple compounding results contracting around details added like never before again. Evolving as displaced debates how else evolving could have happened any other way than personally eternally separated by the moment here.

That simple. Reasonable doubt/toxins + social consensus/viruses = this species ignoring life in plain sight/intellectual cancer to instinctive brains navigating space one at a time ancestral lineages are destroying each other over which ideology inherits the earth after death where eternal souls get a tomorrow.

LowIQTrash » 02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 3:00 am

Has anybody on this forum ever wondered why, despite over 100+ billion cumulatively spent on research (or what passes as research these days - or these past 7 decades), that the cause(s) of cancer remain “unknown?”

Or better…there are no definite / almost definite cures?

…yet somehow there are a large # of so-called miracles where people, many of whom went rogue, in the medical field have treated cancer patients at high success rates ( > 70%)

So how do you retarded retards square these facts with “known information?”

You can super-impose a chart of the growth of the American Cancer Society over a chart of the growth of cancer in our society, and they dovetail very nicely. The American Cancer Society is in fact an advocate for the cancer industry. It receives its pro-bono P.R. services from an in-house firm of Monsanto That firm has precisely two clients: Monsanto, who pays them, and the ACS, which does not pay them. 

By the transitive power of mathematorial indicia, this means that Monsanto foots the ACS's P.R. bills. And what does Monsanto get in return? They get the ACS to focus exclusively on "early detection and treatment" (from which Monsanto profits), instead of on the cause of cancer or the cure for cancer. 
 

DeezerShoove » 02 Mar 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 8:51 am

Successfully "treating" cancer doesn't mean they know the cause.

That is a tiny hole in your damning logic.

Just taking your post at face value.

That is pharma's business model - treat don't cure. 

Curing erases potential profits. Treating goes from cradle to grave evolving ancestrally here now in plain sight. 

PhiloBeddo » 02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:09 am

Jesus Christ All you sad sacks want to talk about is despair. What a cheerfull group. I don't care what I feel like, when anybody asks I always say " I'm Fine "

How I comport in the real world and how I comport online are two different things. 

Fun fact: I have not called anyone a *** dicker at the quicky mart where I spend my food stamps. 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am

.We are so inundated with toxic exposures that it's a miracle we have an average lifespan of 80...!!
Read the labels of all processed foods and it looks like the contents of a chemistry set.
Even people who lived the most "natural lives" in the Amazon rain forest could get cancer if they lived long enough...right...?

One excellent way to avoid the build up of toxins is to get the YUKA app. It rats out the **** you are thinking of buying. I use the YUKA app on the food aisle. It stop the poisons from getting into my shopping cart in the first place, so they never get into my body.

Dementia is caused by the buildup of toxins. It generally takes several decades, but if a person gets exposed to too much **** in their work environment or from living near a nasty dunp or under electrical lines, they can get what is called "early onset" dementia. The key is to avoid the toxins in the first place.

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am

Prevention is the best "cure"...so it seems that improving / maintaining our immune system response is the strategy that we have some control of.
It's my understanding we have "Watch Dog Cells" that specialize in detecting defective cells  and they gobble them up before the defective cells can duplicate.

These cells are swtiched off by glut. The only way to have them operate at peak efficiency is to fast regularly. I do 4 nine day water fasts per year. Eating in a window is also very efficacious with regard to these cells. "Intermittent fasting" - going 18 hours between food windows - is good for weight management AND for your immune system.

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 11:54 am

We need to be able have our immune systems tested [exposed to cancer cells  in a petri dish] to see what sort of supplements might be required to pass the test.
Years ago I was happy to hear that "sharks don't get cancer so let's study them". They will reveal the secret.
Well that ended up being proven untrue. 
Sharks DO get cancer too.

Naturopaths offer hair analysis that tells the tale of the tape and indicates what supplements and chelators will benefit a person.