double negative, slick move. Bet nobody else caught it. Validates my instinctive hunch judge will protect reasonable doubt one way or another charges against Trump stand.Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ The lawyer is not under oath.
I didnt say the attornet general was not under oath.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Yeah...31stArrival » 02 Mar 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ double negative, slick move. Bet nobody else caught it.
You do know what a **** attorney is don't you retard??
Devil's advocate keeping reasonable doubt going each next generation gap adding each 31st arrival so far never same reproduction left evolving forward in plain sight specifically occupying space here in the moment regardless geographical point of displacement.Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ You do know what a **** attorney is don't you retard??
Fani testified under oath.Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ You do know what a **** attorney is don't you retard??
You do know what an attorney in the case is right numb ****.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Fani testified under oath.
And you wanted to take bets she couldn't be charged with perjury.
Remember Harvard?
Just beware, even if the judge throws fani and boyfriend under the bus, the charges are 75% going to continue. so regardless Trump wins in Nov. he will serve the same **** storm he had the first term.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Fani testified under oath.
And you wanted to take bets she couldn't be charged with perjury.
Remember Harvard?
I agree31stArrival » 02 Mar 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Just beware, even if the judge throws fani and boyfriend under the bus, the charges are 75% going to continue. so regardless Trump wins in Nov. he will serve the same **** storm he had the first term.
the world is but a stage to intellectual minds governing individual brains arriving one at time to believe life isn't self evident.
Fani Willis testified under oath.Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You do know what an attorney in the case is right numb ****.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You got caught being a dumb bitch once again.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree
I think the case will likely continue
However, when the DA is lying under oath it opens the doors to other things
This really proves what a truth hating piece of **** BCF really is. In his mind it's OK to lie just as long as you aren't "under oath"...?BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Bidencrimefamily
Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 4,428Contact:
Contact BidencrimefamilyMoney: 7,556
The lawyer isn't under oath.
They can not get charged with perjury because they weren't under oath.
The truth will set you free.
doesn't have too. stop reasoning existentially. life works compounding expanding details into never duplicated contracting results called ancestral lineages as my algorithm describes. series = spontaneously happening and parallel = simultaneously is at the same time. hint, genetics eternally separates all reproductions native to the atmosphere now.BooRadley » 02 Mar 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree
I think the case will likely continue
However, when the DA is lying under oath it opens the doors to other things
Exactly...GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Mar 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ This really proves what a truth hating piece of **** BCF really is. In his mind it's OK to lie just as long as you aren't "under oath"...?
IMO...all public officials and "officers of the court" are under oath 100% of the time that they are "on the clock"....![]()
BCF is a well known Liar who has been forced to eat his lies many times at this forum..so it's no wonder why he would sympathize with Fani Willis.
You do realize that Fani testified under oath correct?Bidencrimefamily » 02 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Zo9 is so stupid. Just removing all doubt about it here.
![]()
![]()
![]()