Why? Because Originalism....Duh!

By R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 4 5 6 7 8 16
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 9:19 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: Try again:

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.
  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.
 
You stopped 35 miles short, Keystrokes Too Far.

And demand to be paid for answers.


 
User avatar
Huey
4 Mar 2024 9:19 am
User avatar
      
36,848 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: You stopped 35 miles short, Keystrokes Too Far.

And demand to be paid for answers.


 

 
Try again:

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
sole
4 Mar 2024 9:20 am
User avatar
      
27,279 posts
R. Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: We're all waiting to hear why...


 
Keep waiting and practicing managing reasonable doubt all the time.
User avatar
Huey
4 Mar 2024 9:25 am
User avatar
      
36,848 posts
R.Suave » 03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: You know how the reflexive response of slack jawed, FOX nursing, MAGAt cretins to the matter of Grifty's Disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is 

"B...b...b...b...but where's the conviction, for Insurrection? Due Process...Derp!"

?

Your patient explanation, to the effect that no conviction is required, is met with disbelief....or worse...

Let this put that particular matter to rest..

if the appeals court were to rule in Trump’s favor, it would have no effect on his disqualification, as the constitutional bar is not based on any conviction for any criminal offense. Although insurrection is indeed a federal crime under 18 US Code § 2383, it became one only in 1948, and it is in any case irrelevant to disqualification under the Constitution. None of the ex-Confederates excluded from office after the amendment went into effect were prosecuted for insurrection.

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/0 ... n-wilentz/

Are we good with this, kids...

Cause there's more.

9-0

POLITICS

Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot 

The Supreme Court on Monday tossed out a Colorado court ruling that barred Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s Republican presidential primary ballot because of a provision in the U.S. Constitution related to people who engage in insurrection.

 The unanimous decision said that “States have no power under the Constitution to” enforce the provision disqualifying people from federal office if they engaged in insurrection, “especially the Presidency.” The ruling said states could disqualify people from holding state offices on those grounds.

 The ruling mean that no other state can bar Trump, or any other candidate, from a presidential ballot by invoking the insurrection clause in the Constitution.


https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/04/supreme ... -case.html


 
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 9:29 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: Try again:

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.
Just the facts..

Your yapyap is irrelevant.
 
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 9:31 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
No...that's the point.

They are reinterpreting the application of Section 3, as well as states' role in administering their elections.
 
User avatar
*rippy38
4 Mar 2024 9:33 am
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: I predict a strike through on the way...

😂
@Huey  

:die:  
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
User avatar
Sumela
4 Mar 2024 9:33 am
User avatar
      
21,730 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: 9-0

Your yapyap is irrelevant.
:LOL:  
 
User avatar
Huey
4 Mar 2024 9:35 am
User avatar
      
36,848 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: Just the facts..

Your yapyap is irrelevant.
 

 
Those are the facts.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 10:45 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
Is this "relevant," Pook?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... t-opinion/  :die:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 10:46 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
But the unanimous decision by the SCOTUS - that is relevant, yeah? Image

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supr ... t-opinion/


EAT those copy-pasted words, you **** bitch! :die:  

@Vegas  
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 10:59 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Free Speech for People, a group that represented plaintiffs in several cases similar to the Colorado one, said the Supreme Court had “made a mockery” of the 14th Amendment: “As of today, states can exclude a presidential candidate from the ballot because he did not submit the proper paperwork with the proper number of verified signatures, but not because he fomented a bloody insurrection against the U.S. Constitution.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/04 ... ado-ballot
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 11:02 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: Free Speech for People, a group that represented plaintiffs in several cases similar to the Colorado one, said the Supreme Court had “made a mockery” of the 14th Amendment:
Wait - losers cry? Thanks for that clarification. Image
 
 Next time I school you, learn faster. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:04 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: Wait - losers cry? Thanks for that clarification. Image
 
 Next time I school you, learn faster.
I got it right, for the right reasons...
again.
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 11:04 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
Cannonpointer » 03 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: He genuinely believes he is posting "facts." He does not realize he is posting rather specious arguments that will NEVER actually stand up in a court of law. 

What the fruitcake does not realize is that even if Trump COULD be removed from the ballot, this will only happen in deep blue states. So far, Maine, Colorado and Illinois have removed him.  Of course, he is still on the ballot in all three states, pending appeal. The removal will almost certainly fail - but I would not dare bet the farm on it, these days. The attempt to remove him failed in liberal Washington State (and a dozen others), and was not appealed. NOT THAT IT MATTERS. Trump isn't going to win a single elector out of Washington, because it is winner take all and the more populous western half is going democ rat.

There being but two states whose electors are not winner take all (Nebraska and Maine),it matters not a whit if California successfully removes Trump from the ballot. This is just thayatah. And of COURSE, the gay boy is invested. Those types ADOAH thayatah.
@R. Suave  fell for the thayatah - because he is thayatah people... :rolleyes:   :drool:  
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 11:05 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: I got it right, for the right reasons...
again.
Yes yes, gay boi - YOU got it right, and the SCOTUS en banc got it wrong.  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:06 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: @R. Suave  fell for the thayatah - because he is thayatah people... Image   Image
When you figure out what SCOTUS said, get back to me.
User avatar
*rippy38
4 Mar 2024 11:06 am
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: Free Speech for People, a group that represented plaintiffs in several cases similar to the Colorado one, said the Supreme Court had “made a mockery” of the 14th Amendment: “As of today, states can exclude a presidential candidate from the ballot because he did not submit the proper paperwork with the proper number of verified signatures, but not because he fomented a bloody insurrection against the U.S. Constitution.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/04 ... ado-ballot
You sound upset... but keep telling us you're not.

:rofl:  
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:07 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: Yes yes, gay boi - YOU got it right, and the SCOTUS en banc got it wrong.  Image   Image   Image
Per curiam, not en banc, **** idiot.

And the decision is consistent with my forecasts of late dec (already posted)
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Mar 2024 11:07 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,981 posts
That boy insists HE got it right and the SCOTUS got it wrong. That boy is one special kind of dictaker.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 4 5 6 7 8 16

Who is online

In total there are 6392 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 6366 guests
Bots: SiteLockSpider, MQQBrowser, LCC, proximic, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, ADmantX, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search