Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
By R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Mar 2024 11:34 am
Are you trying to explain why your copy paste was wrong with another copy paste, you poor sensitive thing?R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Given these possibilities, it is at least understandable that the majority wanted to take Section 3 off the table. To get there, the court relied, albeit not in a full-throated way, on the only precedent of any importance: Griffin’s Case, an 1869 circuit court decision written by then Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase in his capacity as a circuit justice. At oral argument, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was the one pushing this precedent, and it’s a fair assumption that his view prevailed among the other conservatives excluding Barrett.
The reason the court didn’t trumpet its reliance on precedent is probably that the decision isn’t all that well reasoned, as the conservative originalist scholars who put the whole Section 3 question on the public agenda noted. The most important legal and constitutional takeaway of Trump v. Anderson is that, when it comes to the weight of precedent, strong reasoning actually isn’t and shouldn’t be all that important.
Supreme Court Buries the Fantasy of Keeping Trump Off the Ballot
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... ado-ballot
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 11:35 am
Well... all nine of them "made an awful decision for spurious reasons"... so it's kinda hard to disagree with it.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the Court made an awful decision for spurious reasons.
But I wasn't surprised
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 11:38 am
RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Well... all nine of them "made an awful decision for spurious reasons"... so it's kinda hard to disagree with it.
many of us hoped for a 9-0 decision to eliminate the party line argument.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
4 Mar 2024 11:40 am
They didn't make it for the same reasons.RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Well... all nine of them "made an awful decision for spurious reasons"... so it's kinda hard to disagree with it.
4 Mar 2024 11:42 am
Naah...it's just that I've never given a **** what a tweener pizza hut sous chef "thinks" about legal matters.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you trying to explain why your copy paste was wrong with another copy paste, you poor sensitive thing?
4 Mar 2024 11:43 am
Tell the OP, fruity.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Naah...it's just that I've never given a **** what a tweener pizza hut sous chef "thinks" about legal matters.
ORIGINALISM!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 11:43 am
You lostR.Suave » 03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You know how the reflexive response of slack jawed, FOX nursing, MAGAt cretins to the matter of Grifty's Disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is
"B...b...b...b...but where's the conviction, for Insurrection? Due Process...Derp!"
?
Your patient explanation, to the effect that no conviction is required, is met with disbelief....or worse...
Let this put that particular matter to rest..
if the appeals court were to rule in Trump’s favor, it would have no effect on his disqualification, as the constitutional bar is not based on any conviction for any criminal offense. Although insurrection is indeed a federal crime under 18 US Code § 2383, it became one only in 1948, and it is in any case irrelevant to disqualification under the Constitution. None of the ex-Confederates excluded from office after the amendment went into effect were prosecuted for insurrection.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/0 ... n-wilentz/
Are we good with this, kids...
Cause there's more.
4 Mar 2024 11:44 am
But NOT graciously.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 11:45 am
So there were MULTIPLE flaws in your arguments - thank you for that admission, ya **** fruitcake!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 11:45 am
Then then means that Colorado was wrong on more than one position... and it confirms that it was indeed the right call.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 11:46 am
ExactlyCannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ So there were MULTIPLE flaws in your arguments - thank you for that admission, ya **** fruitcake!
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 11:52 am
No....it means that SCOTUS reinterpreted Section 3.RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Then then means that Colorado was wrong on more than one position... and it confirms that it was indeed the right call.
4 Mar 2024 11:53 am
None, actually.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ So there were MULTIPLE flaws in your arguments - thank you for that admission, ya **** fruitcake!
Which is why SCOTUS had to "invent" one.
4 Mar 2024 12:14 pm
When you repost my stuff- I won't entertain your stalking.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Mar 2024 12:15 pm
It isn't worth reading the first time.
4 Mar 2024 12:15 pm
Yet, you read it and repost it over and over. It sounds like you love it.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Mar 2024 12:16 pm
No, no, fruitcake. According to your most RECENT mouthpoop, they invented MORE than one, Remember?
When one does nothing but ****, it is hard to keep one's **** straight, fruitcake.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 12:22 pm
All 9 of them. Even the Communist and the Dyke. You **** must be running out of money, because you couldn't even pay-off the ones who are in the tank for the retarded old man **** himself while sleeping in President Trump's chair.
The Real President Conducting Real Business
Retard Pretending To Be President
Signing His Drawer
While Jill Pulls The Retard's Strings
4 Mar 2024 12:26 pm
Then why not quote, verbatim?Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, no, fruitcake. According to your most RECENT mouthpoop, they invented MORE than one, Remember?
When one does nothing but ****, it is hard to keep one's **** straight, fruitcake.
4 Mar 2024 12:34 pm
They never invented the false claim of Insurrection ......Democrats, RINO's and the Biden administration did that all by themselves ....
Get used to losing .....because of it ....
Who is online
In total there are 5504 users online :: 13 registered, 14 bots, and 5477 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Sayaras, sole, ….., Fuelman
Bots: MicroMessenger, proximic, ADmantX, Bolt, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, curl/7, CriteoBot, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google