Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
By R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Mar 2024 12:37 pm
I'd rather mock the *** who claimed there were multiple reasons and one post later referred to the reasons in the singular, fruitcake.
Your questions have no standing with people whose questions you routinely duck, maroon.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 12:40 pm
Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd rather mock the *** who claimed there were multiple reasons and one post later referred to the reasons in the singular, fruitcake.
Your questions have no standing with people whose questions you routinely duck, maroon.
Retelling your retelling...
4 Mar 2024 12:41 pm
One would imagine your OP did NOT get stuffed down your gullet, fruitcake.
But it did. And you insisted there were multiple reasons this happened.
Then you said one reason One post later. You are one saucy little flibbertygibbet, ya hussy.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 12:45 pm
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the Court made an awful decision for spurious reasons.
It went from "reasons" and "not the same reasons" to ONE "reason" - and the queer is too stupid to put it in reverse. He thinks he is stuck defending "reason" in the face of his previous posts.
Yes. He is THAT very stupid.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 1:37 pm
There were 3 opinions.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑
It went from "reasons" and "not the same reasons" to ONE "reason" - and the queer is too stupid to put it in reverse. He thinks he is stuck defending "reason" in the face of his previous posts.
Yes. He is THAT very stupid.
Ya follah?
4 Mar 2024 2:07 pm
Ya, an all tree of em went again Colorado.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 2:33 pm
So you were wrong when you referred to the "invented" stuff in the singular.
You follow - but you're a fruit.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 2:34 pm
It means that all nine Justices thought Colorado was in error for trying to have Trump removed from the ballot.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 2:35 pm
So?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 2:35 pm
R.Suave » 03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You know how the reflexive response of slack jawed, FOX nursing, MAGAt cretins to the matter of Grifty's Disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is
"B...b...b...b...but where's the conviction, for Insurrection? Due Process...Derp!"
?
Your patient explanation, to the effect that no conviction is required, is met with disbelief....or worse...
Let this put that particular matter to rest..
if the appeals court were to rule in Trump’s favor, it would have no effect on his disqualification, as the constitutional bar is not based on any conviction for any criminal offense. Although insurrection is indeed a federal crime under 18 US Code § 2383, it became one only in 1948, and it is in any case irrelevant to disqualification under the Constitution. None of the ex-Confederates excluded from office after the amendment went into effect were prosecuted for insurrection.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/0 ... n-wilentz/
Are we good with this, kids...
Cause there's more.
Well....since there was NO insurrection.......
4 Mar 2024 2:37 pm
He just wants to change the topic into ANYTHING but how wrong he was.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 2:37 pm
Not this **** again.
4 Mar 2024 2:39 pm
He wants to act like he's not, but that bitch is bawling on the inside over this...Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ He just wants to change the topic into ANYTHING but how wrong he was.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 2:39 pm
ORIGINALISM....DUH!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 2:41 pm
The insurrection was REAL.
Every bit as real as russia russia russia, this thread's OP, and boys "transitioning" to girls, fruity fruit fruit.
It was as real as "Look, boss - the CLIMATE, the CLIMATE," Tattoo.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 2:44 pm
Oh, his vadge is in an uproar, for sure. All that preening, and now he looks like an ***.RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He wants to act like he's not, but that bitch is bawling on the inside over this...
He wants one thing very much - to argue over fiddle-faddle and frippery.
Because he got BIIIITCH-SLAPPED on the meat and putaydas!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 2:59 pm
4 Mar 2024 3:19 pm
@R.Suave must write for Slate. They are trying to spin a 9-0 slapping of CO into a 5-4 controversial ruling. All nine justices ruled states, not just CO, could not remove a candidate for a federal position from their ballot using the 14th (basically just Presidential candidates). That action could only be done at the federal level. The reason for multiple opinions is the reason(s) the justices used as a basis for their decision, but they all agrees states don't have the authority.
4 Mar 2024 3:51 pm
It was a protest turned into a mob by morons. The insurrection that wasn’t.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
4 Mar 2024 3:56 pm
An illiterate toady....or the Colorado Supreme Court?Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ It was a protest turned into a mob by morons. The insurrection that wasn’t.
Must be a trick question.
Who is online
In total there are 6404 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 6377 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, springfield xd, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: MQQBrowser, LCC, Bolt, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, proximic, CriteoBot, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, bingbot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot