Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
Why? Because Originalism....Duh!
By R. Suave
4 Mar 2024 11:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Mar 2024 4:00 pm
There was no "slapping"....Colorado was working with Section 3 as understood, not as rewritten.ConsRule » 04 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ @R.Suave must write for Slate. They are trying to spin a 9-0 slapping of CO into a 5-4 controversial ruling. All nine justices ruled states, not just CO, could not remove a candidate for a federal position from their ballot using the 14th (basically just Presidential candidates). That action could only be done at the federal level. The reason for multiple opinions is the reason(s) the justices used as a basis for their decision, but they all agrees states don't have the authority.
The disagreement over Congress' role is not trivial, nor confined to the liberal wing.
4 Mar 2024 4:04 pm
Ah... a "retelling"R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ There was no "slapping"....Colorado was working with Section 3 as understood, not as rewritten.
The disagreement over Congress' role is not trivial, nor confined to the liberal wing.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
4 Mar 2024 4:12 pm
A unanimous ruling against CO is a slapping...IMO.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ There was no "slapping"....Colorado was working with Section 3 as understood, not as rewritten.
The disagreement over Congress' role is not trivial, nor confined to the liberal wing.
SCOTUS didn't "rewrite" a damn thing. They interpreted the Constitution as written. Read Section 5 of the amendment...it was mentioned in the ruling. Even the liberal justices ruled states don't have the authority. They had different opinions as to why, but they agreed they don't have the authority. Your not wanting to admit that doesn't change the facts.
4 Mar 2024 4:40 pm
The recently overturned Co Court. When he is charged AND convicted in federal court let me know.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ An illiterate toady....or the Colorado Supreme Court?
Must be a trick question.
Until then ya got bupkis.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
4 Mar 2024 5:46 pm
Only one was nullified, jaggov.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ An illiterate toady....or the Colorado Supreme Court?
Must be a trick question.
Because originalism....Duh!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 5:48 pm
More!R.Suave » 03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑
if the appeals court were to rule in Trump’s favor, it would have no effect on his disqualification, as the constitutional bar is not based on any conviction for any criminal offense. Although insurrection is indeed a federal crime under 18 US Code § 2383, it became one only in 1948, and it is in any case irrelevant to disqualification under the Constitution. None of the ex-Confederates excluded from office after the amendment went into effect were prosecuted for insurrection.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/0 ... n-wilentz/
Are we good with this, kids...
Cause there's more.
We want MORE!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 6:32 pm
You started bleating that 91 counts, a rape finding and 500 million in judgements agoHuey » 04 Mar 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The recently overturned Co Court. When he is charged AND convicted in federal court let me know.
Until then ya got bupkis.
4 Mar 2024 6:33 pm
ConsRule » 04 Mar 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A unanimous ruling against CO is a slapping...IMO.
SCOTUS didn't "rewrite" a damn thing. They interpreted the Constitution as written. Read Section 5 of the amendment...it was mentioned in the ruling. Even the liberal justices ruled states don't have the authority. They had different opinions as to why, but they agreed they don't have the authority. Your not wanting to admit that doesn't change the facts.
that says it all, IMO.IMO.
4 Mar 2024 6:49 pm
R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You started bleating that 91 counts, a rape finding and 500 million in judgements ago
Do these little mean-girl snipes dull the pain of getting stuffed, your fruitiness?
9-0. A ROUT!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 7:15 pm
As I pointed out, they just rewrote the 14th Amendment.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Do these little mean-girl snipes dull the pain of getting stuffed, your fruitiness?
9-0. A ROUT!
But instead of any of these options, the court went with arguably the broadest reasoning available: that Section 3 isn’t self-executing, and thus has no force or effect in the absence of congressional action. This argument is rooted in Section 5 of the amendment, which states that “Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
But Section 5, on its face, does not give Congress exclusive power to enforce the amendment. As Justices Elena Kagan, Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson pointed out in their own separate concurring opinion, “All the Reconstruction amendments (including the due process and equal protection guarantees and prohibition of slavery) ‘are self-executing,’ meaning that they do not depend on legislation.” While Congress may pass legislation to help enforce the 14th Amendment, it is not required to do so, and the 14th Amendment still binds federal, state and local governments even if Congress refuses to act.
But now Section 3 is different from other sections of the amendment. It requires federal legislation to enforce its terms, at least as applied to candidates for federal office. Through inaction alone, Congress can effectively erase part of the 14th Amendment.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/04/opin ... ution.html
4 Mar 2024 7:32 pm
Really? You should do another copy paste.
It'll somehow make your last copy pastes look less retar ted.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 7:36 pm
I find it more persuasive than memes, emojis, and repetition.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Really? You should do another copy paste.
It'll somehow make your last copy pastes look less retar ted.
4 Mar 2024 7:55 pm
Whom did you persuade, and how embarrassed are they?R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I find it more persuasive than memes, emojis, and repetition.
9-0.
That's some serious justicin'.
ORIGINALISM! Duh!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Mar 2024 8:02 pm
I think Rico listened to Keith Olberman this afternoon and was "inspired"...Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Whom did you persuade, and how embarrassed are they?
9-0.
That's some serious justicin'.
ORIGINALISM! Duh!
Lol
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
5 Mar 2024 4:56 am
9-0.R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You started bleating that 91 counts, a rape finding and 500 million in judgements ago
And don’t play that **** that is what you expected.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
5 Mar 2024 5:47 am
evolving works .0-999999999 for each 1.0 ancestor be it male, female, intellectually choosing another gender/species than the ancestry that conceived their time adapting here now occupying the moment here any generation gap still alive or added forward one at a time.
What is your point of origin to adapting as displaced now? Mine was conceived by 2 parents, from 4 grandparents after 8 great grandparents preceded after 16 great great grandparents changing population since inception off this species.
Series parallel chain reactions to compounding DNA physically eternally separating the numbers adapting forward now. originalism you blind faith denying bastards. Damn My instinctive brain is mad as hell.
5 Mar 2024 6:11 am
You mean, by quoting my unambiguous stand?
That's an outrage!
5 Mar 2024 6:12 am
No...I read.RedheadedStranger » 04 Mar 2024, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I think Rico listened to Keith Olberman this afternoon and was "inspired"...
Lol
It's why I know so much more than you do, Rippy.
5 Mar 2024 6:15 am
look at you ignoring life in plain sight using mantra defying your own time self evidently here thinking you outsmarted everyone else alive behaving exactly as everyone else alive minus one.R. Suave » 05 Mar 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ You mean, by quoting my unambiguous stand?
That's an outrage!
me, myself, and I limited to a sole displaced reproduction trying to head off this species eliminating itself from the universal moment forever more.
Over what, imagining life isn't self evident.
Like my originalism folks? Been telling you all, "I am" Nostradamus' prophecy about "One Male".
5 Mar 2024 6:22 am
9-0R.Suave » 05 Mar 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ No...I read.
It's why I know so much more than you do, Rippy.
Try to spin that
Who is online
In total there are 6674 users online :: 10 registered, 15 bots, and 6649 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, nefarious101, springfield xd, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Bolt, SiteLockSpider, MQQBrowser, LCC, YandexBot, ADmantX, proximic, bingbot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7