Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:37 am

What's the point of me reading a citation you don't understand?

You haven't proven that.  I ain't got time for your trolling ****.  You have not provided proof that a court ruling or finding is needed.  

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:40 am

You haven't proven that.  I ain't got time for your trolling ****.  You have not provided proof that a court ruling or finding is needed.

 

 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:54 am

       

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:58 am

     

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families?

How many designs?

 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am

How many families?

How many designs?

Wait... wut?

I think you're on the wrong thread Rico.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 9:59 am

Wait... wut?

I think you're on the wrong thread Rico.

 
 

 

He is having a Biden moment. 
 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am

How many families?

How many designs?

 


 

Asked and answered many times.  But you are on the wrong thread. 
 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 8:55 pm

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:13 am

No, you haven't.  What you have demonstrated is you do not read citations provided for you. If you did you would not have called the second citation, the one that explains the issues to you, repetitive.

What's the point of me reading a citation you don't understand?

 

 

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:40 am

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:37 am

What's the point of me reading a citation you don't understand?

You haven't proven that.  I ain't got time for your trolling ****.  You have not provided proof that a court ruling or finding is needed.  

 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 8:55 pm

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 8:58 am

     

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families?

How many designs?

 

 

 

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:01 am

RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 9:59 am

Wait... wut?

I think you're on the wrong thread Rico.

 
 


 

He is having a Biden moment. 
 

 

 

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:11 am

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 9:12 am

How many families?

How many designs?

 



 

Asked and answered many times.  But you are on the wrong thread. 
 

 

**** morons.

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:23 am

 

 

 

 


**** morons.

 

I see you are still having a biden moment. 

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:25 am

I see you are still having a biden moment.

Clearly not.

That's the Record.

Again demonstrating that you cannot retain context for less than 1 hr.
 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:28 am

Clearly not.

That's the Record.

Again demonstrating that you cannot retain context for less than 1 hr.

All that record shows is YOU do not understand context and content.  Plus, go argue with the ATF.  They disagree with your one design argument. 

 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:23 am

**** morons.

 
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:33 am

 

I can't "spin" Tiny's posts..

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:32 am

All that record shows is YOU do not understand context and content. Plus, go argue with the ATF.  They disagree with your one design argument.

No, it doesn't.

It is proof positive that you don't understand the words in front of you.
 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:39 am

No, it doesn't.

It is proof positive that you don't understand the words in front of you.

Go argue with the ATF.

 

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:48 am

Go argue with the ATF.

A) They have nothing to do with it
B) You cherry picked a word, contradicting the actual truth of ATF's position...and your own citation.

Point made.

Take the L, again.


 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:54 am

A) They have nothing to do with it
B) You cherry picked a word, contradicting the actual truth of ATF's position...and your own citation.

Point made.

Take the L, again.

Yeah, they do.  They had to classify the weapon as a NFA weapon or a Non NFA weapon.

You are showing you do not understand citations.

 

R.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:54 am

A) They have nothing to do with it
B) You cherry picked a word, contradicting the actual truth of ATF's position...and your own citation.

Point made.

Take the L, again.

**** THE ATF, FBI AND DOJ

Huey » 06 Mar 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 10:58 am

Yeah, they do.  They had to classify the weapon as a NFA weapon or a Non NFA weapon.

You are showing you do not understand citations.

Which has NOTHING to do with the purpose for THE design.

If the BATFR.Suave » 06 Mar 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 11:02 am

Which has NOTHING to do with the purpose for THE design.

 

If Colt did not have a different design, moron, it would have been a NFA weapon.  And since it was knew to the military it probably would not have been sold to the public.

Go argue with them.  The colt sporter was not designed for combat.  You have been **** wrong about this for 7 **** years.  Go ahead and embarrass yourself again.

I am not arguing with yhou over your stupidity.