Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » 04 Mar 2024, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:08 am

SUCKS FOR YOU, :LOSER!!!

ALL SUPREME COURT RULINGS KICK YOUR *** ON THIS ONE!!

That has to massively SUCK for you??

Bet this *** KICKING where it's around your neck has left you smelling your OWN ****!!

What SCOTUS ruling have you cited?

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am

What SCOTUS ruling have you cited?

My name isn't Google, ****!!

It's in the TEXT of my REPLY THAT KICKED YOUR PIECE OF **** ***!!

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am

What SCOTUS ruling have you cited?

Suave...
You're probably going to be right!

Trump will not be allowed to run for president in some states.
It's what you want and it might come true..

Might have a ruling in a few hours.
Early congrats.
 

ROG62 » 04 Mar 2024, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 6:22 am

the **** thinks it's a trigger point....  

No I think you're a lying son of a *** whore.

Beekeeper » 04 Mar 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:24 am

My name isn't Google, ****!!

It's in the TEXT of my REPLY THAT KICKED YOUR PIECE OF **** ***!!

No...your name is Fondler....and you're an idiot.


 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 6:46 am

It's not about me....it's about what a **** idiot you are.

Now answer the question, **** idiot.

Help him out @ROG62  ....

**** off with your questions, Askholio.  Don't make me come to Salem.  

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:33 am

**** off with your questions, Askholio.  Don't make me come to Salem.

Answer the question, Quimmie....THEN hop on that Greyhound...
 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:36 am

Answer the question, Quimmie....THEN hop on that Greyhound...

**** YOU SHILLY, YOU NEVER ANSWER QUESTIONS

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:36 am

Answer the question, Quimmie....THEN hop on that Greyhound...

Calm down, Mary.  You'll figure it out, Richard. As in Richard Head. 

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:04 am

Calm down, Mary.  You'll figure it out, Richard. As in Richard Head.

Always 35 miles short, Quimmie.

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:05 am

Always 35 miles short, Quimmie.

Says Cowardly Too Far.  After all those threats you were scared.  

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:07 am

Says Cowardly Too Far.  After all those threats you were scared.

no...you stopped 35 miles short.

Because you're all yap....all the time.

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:16 am

no...you stopped 35 miles short.

Because you're all yap....all the time.

 

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.  

R. Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:15 am

What SCOTUS ruling have you cited?

would that be recited since the cite was already established at the ruling? You're topic is originalism, and repeating history isn't originalism setting a precedence of reasonable doubt used until extinction of the species repeating history every generation gap added after precedent of what if becomes facts comparing what about..

R.Suave » 03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Mar 2024, 12:01 pm

You know how the reflexive response of slack jawed, FOX nursing, MAGAt cretins to the matter of Grifty's Disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is 

"B...b...b...b...but where's the conviction, for Insurrection? Due Process...Derp!"

?

Your patient explanation, to the effect that no conviction is required, is met with disbelief....or worse...

Let this put that particular matter to rest..

if the appeals court were to rule in Trump’s favor, it would have no effect on his disqualification, as the constitutional bar is not based on any conviction for any criminal offense. Although insurrection is indeed a federal crime under 18 US Code § 2383, it became one only in 1948, and it is in any case irrelevant to disqualification under the Constitution. None of the ex-Confederates excluded from office after the amendment went into effect were prosecuted for insurrection.

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2024/0 ... n-wilentz/

Are we good with this, kids...

Cause there's more.

The SCOTUS just made you the laughing stock of this board .....
how does it feel?
and because of this ruling .....
Jack Smith and the DOJ  is now **** too....
You clueless idiot.....

Majik » 04 Mar 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:12 am

The SCOTUS just made you the laughing stock of this board .....
how does it feel?
and because of this ruling .....
Jack Smith and the DOJ  is now **** too....
You clueless idiot.....

We're all waiting to hear why...


 

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:18 am

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.

You stopped 35 miles short, Keystrokes Too Far.

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:14 am

We're all waiting to hear why...

Precedent...

 

R.Suave » 04 Mar 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:15 am

You stopped 35 miles short, Keystrokes Too Far.

 

Try again:

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.

Huey » 04 Mar 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 10:16 am

Try again:

No, I traveled over 600 miles and you were to afraid to travel 30 miles.  Because you are a keyboard komando that talks too much.  If you are ever 30 miles from me I will be there.

I predict a strike through on the way...