Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
I can take anyone here in a debate
I can take anyone here in a debate
By ActionJackson
5 Mar 2024 2:03 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Mar 2024 2:29 pm
5 Mar 2024 2:32 pm
He takes his cues from Rico so... what do you expect?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
5 Mar 2024 2:33 pm
I noticed thatRedheadedStranger » 05 Mar 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ He takes his cues from Rico so... what do you expect?
Both are snot nosed teen brats.
5 Mar 2024 2:34 pm
This record doesn't include the times that you have already been curb stomped.
0 - 15 is more accurate. I can't give you the 2 , because you didn't debate anyone to justify it.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Mar 2024 2:35 pm
5 Mar 2024 2:35 pm
5 Mar 2024 2:39 pm
Where dose it say on that list if they are *** or crackers?GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Compared to Caucasians.....full blooded Sub Saharan ****** have contributed / introduced almost nothing of a revolutionary, ground breaking, technical nature to the advancement of mankind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_p ... ific_field
5 Mar 2024 2:41 pm
Dumb. If you really wanted to debate, you would have stated a valid topic for debate, staked out your position and only then say what you said. You lost the debate before even starting. Just like a retard who can't figure out how to get onto the short bus.
5 Mar 2024 2:46 pm
At least @GHETTO BLASTER stated a premise. That is far more than you did in your OP (or anywhere in this thread). And, when he staked out a position, your response was pure ad hominem attack. Ghetto was right - Game, Set, Match. You lost.ActionJackson » 05 Mar 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ And just when I thought the witty intellects were coming along. Here comes Hamster.
5 Mar 2024 2:46 pm
Your shirt's too small.Skans » 05 Mar 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Dumb. If you really wanted to debate, you would have stated a valid topic for debate, staked out your position and only then say what you said. You lost the debate before even starting. Just like a retard who can't figure out how to get onto the short bus.
5 Mar 2024 2:49 pm
Here ya go bud...
viewforum.php?f=21
Start a topic and see if anyone bites.
Good luck.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
5 Mar 2024 2:49 pm
Mrkelly » 05 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Where dose it say on that list if they are *** or crackers?
It goes back to a discussion by Ghetto Bastard and me. He kept referring to "Sub-Saharan ******" as "SSN."
The only SSN abbreviation I know is social security number. No sane person uses that SSN abbreviation the way he does. I told him I had no idea what he was even talking about because I never heard of "SSN."
He then called me a liar and posted pics of blacks brains he copied from Stormfront. And now, he follows me on a bunch of threads and keeps posting brain pics.
5 Mar 2024 2:50 pm
It says, "This board is the place for serious debate"RedheadedStranger » 05 Mar 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Here ya go bud...
viewforum.php?f=21
Start a topic and see if anyone bites.
Good luck.
ty for another laff
5 Mar 2024 2:51 pm
Will you be responsible to answer questions?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
5 Mar 2024 2:51 pm
That particular subforum is the place for serious debate.ActionJackson » 05 Mar 2024, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It says, "This board is the place for serious debate"
ty for another laff
This one isn't.
I guess that would confuse an idiot like you.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
5 Mar 2024 2:51 pm
No, actually @ActionJackson did lose the debate. He made one statement, and it was an ad hominim attack, an attempt to discredit GB's argument by personally attacking him instead of discussing the premise itself. AJ would have lost points for that in a debate. And, because he did not even attempt to make any points beyond the ad hominim attack, he actually lost the debate.FOS » 05 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ What is funny is that actually he didn't 'lose' any debate...he failed to even provide any response to your claim. He did not make a point. He did not make a counter claim. And without a claim you certainly cannot offer any evidence for anything.
5 Mar 2024 2:52 pm
This thread is going on three pages now!
5 Mar 2024 2:53 pm
what do you want to debate about?
5 Mar 2024 2:53 pm
That's last month's news, Sally.Skans » 05 Mar 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ No, actually @ActionJackson did lose the debate. He made one statement, and it was an ad hominim attack, an attempt to discredit GB's argument by personally attacking him instead of discussing the premise itself. AJ would have lost points for that in a debate. And, because he did not even attempt to make any points beyond the ad hominim attack, he actually lost the debate.
5 Mar 2024 2:54 pm
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy that is committed when you say something like 'x is false because you are a bad person'. Aj couldn't even manage that much...he didn't even say that any claim was false. He is in fact too stupid to even make a logical fallacy.Skans » 05 Mar 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ No, actually @ActionJackson did lose the debate. He made one statement, and it was an ad hominim attack, an attempt to discredit GB's argument by personally attacking him instead of discussing the premise itself. AJ would have lost points for that in a debate. And, because he did not even attempt to make any points beyond the ad hominim attack, he actually lost the debate.
Who is online
In total there are 4215 users online :: 15 registered, 19 bots, and 4181 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, MR-7, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole
Bots: Baiduspider, TTD-Content, msnbot, LCC, proximic, ADmantX, DuckDuckGo, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, Pinterest, CensysInspect, Kinza, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot