Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 9:52 am

Courageous Coozie...

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:14 am

Here is a link you should have provided.  By the way, is that a sentiment poll?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/233 ... in-the-us/

LEGAL immigration is a good thing.

Here is a sentiment poll on illegal immigration:

Americans are increasingly concerned about the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border, and the percentage who think the Biden administration should be tougher on immigrants trying to cross it is up to the highest percentage yet.

Most say the border situation is very serious, and nearly half now say it's a crisis — up from May — a change in sentiment driven primarily by Democrats and independents. As a result, President Biden's approval on handing the U.S.-Mexico border has also dropped, and his approval on handling immigration in general is at an all-time low, though it hasn't dragged down his overall approval rating.Support for transporting migrants to northern cities has also dipped — among Democrats and Republicans — and now, most Americans disapprove of the practice.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-o ... er-crisis/

It has pretty pictures for you as well.

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:16 am

Again, sentiment polls are **** because many people are only marginally better informed, and less credulous, than you.

 

DeezerShoove » 07 Mar 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:15 am

The only time you don't ask questions is copy/paste tripe or weak **** like this.
You are unable to do the exact opposite of your Trump-attack-mode in support of Biden.
Your hit list of **** Qualities leveled at Trump should have a countering list for your hero.

I'll get you started:
Trump's off-the-cuff remarks hurt his credibility.
Biden's off-the-cuff remarks enhance his credibility.

Trump took two cognitive tests during his term.
Biden took two cognitive tests during his term.

Trump's family is fair game for any and all actions to seek truth.
Biden's family is fair game for any and all actions to seek truth.

----
You get the idea. Give it a whirl. It's obviously only half-rightisms.
Surely you can damn one and revere the other by direct comparisons.

btw
See? No copy/paste. It's easy for a normal person.

Trump's off-the-cuff remarks hurt his credibility.

Trump took two cognitive tests during his term.

Trump's family is fair game for any and all actions to seek truth.

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:21 am

And yet you have posted two of them today.

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:25 am

Yup.

So I guess you are now left to address the data.

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:27 am

Nah, I countered with my own.  Read what people post before flapping your gums.

DeezerShoove » 07 Mar 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:15 am

The only time you don't ask questions is copy/paste tripe or weak **** like this.
You are unable to do the exact opposite of your Trump-attack-mode in support of Biden.
Your hit list of **** Qualities leveled at Trump should have a countering list for your hero.

I'll get you started:
Trump's off-the-cuff remarks hurt his credibility.
Biden's off-the-cuff remarks enhance his credibility.

Trump took two cognitive tests during his term.
Biden took two cognitive tests during his term.

Trump's family is fair game for any and all actions to seek truth.
Biden's family is fair game for any and all actions to seek truth.

----
You get the idea. Give it a whirl. It's obviously only half-rightisms.
Surely you can damn one and revere the other by direct comparisons.

btw
See? No copy/paste. It's easy for a normal person.  

 

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:24 am

There's that.

The lifetime record of bombast, misrepresentation and fraud has likely contributed.

and recently referred to his "wife" as "Mercedes"...

Hunter has been under investigation far longer than any of the Grifty spawn.

James Comer has spent longer on his investigation than it took Jack Smith to generate indictments.

But hey....

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:28 am

IF he criticizes biden in anyway he will lose his good standing in the Biden Protective Agency (BPA)

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

DeezerShoove » 07 Mar 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:29 am

"The lifetime record of..."
     
He probably bragged in 6th grade too.

btw
Biden is a plagiarist. All while in office (on our dime for decades).
btw2
Biden probably couldn't pick his wife out of a two-person line up.

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:58 am

You've read the books....watched Apprentice...

You've peered into the man's soul.

Seen what so many of his appointees failed to recognize.

The Competence.

The Professionalism.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

DeezerShoove » 07 Mar 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:05 am

I had never paid any attention to Trump.
He was a bombastic asshole that people and institutions I detest found intolerable.
Then I began to like his style when he started policking.
You, asswipe, are a perfect example of the attraction many have for Trump.

Need I remind you of my siggy?
I've had the same one a long time (before Trump came on the political scene).

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:22 am

I hope you might appreciate how stupid that sounds....

"I always thought he was an asshole, but when I saw who else thought he was an asshole....."

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

DeezerShoove » 07 Mar 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:28 am

You live on that type of ****, Maddow. Get real.

31stArrival » 07 Mar 2024, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 5:54 am

To the states or the individual liberty to live as conceived to die uniquely alive now. yes there needs to be rules of engagement each generation must accept time limits set since conceived to evolving here one at a time.

Every ancestor evolves from a fertilized cell in stages of conceived, zygote, embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, adolescent, puberty, teen, adult. Then comes the real test of time,
1. did or didn't become a parent to another generation gap or outlived one's children.
2. did or didn't become 1 of 4 grandparents or outlived their grandchild/ren
3. did or didn't become 1 of 8 great grandparents even if died after becoming 1 of 2 parents.
4, did or didn't become 1 of 16 great great grandparents dead or alive.

Every child born today came from the ancestry listed above since inception of this species into this atmosphere.

Equally created male or female added as a 1/3 life time adapting in sequence of arrival until dead. All over 8 billion homo sapiens exist evolving here now one at a time.

So back to the interpretation of State's rights? what mind remembers state of mind is imagining life beyond adapting to the moment here. My brain navigates space for the time I have adapting as specifically displaced since conceived to replace my 30 soles 4 generations prior to my arrival.

why am I the only one defending my actual time evolving in plain sight? PC

personal choice.