Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm

Okay, Clarrence Narrow - we'll accept the expertise of the dumbest **** in the thread.

To start new they would need a new indictment. They already HAVE an indictment, so getting a new one would be improper. 

Prosecuting under the existing one means taking the existing case, *** grease and all, and running THAT slippery ball over the goal line, delivering it to an appellate court with all of fani's funk on it. 

You need to focus on the attorneys' tits, sloe. You're WAY the **** out of your wheelhouse.

Just wait 

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 3:07 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:07 am

And they'd have gotten away with it, too - if it hadn't been for those meddling investigators!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH_1w86Ut-w

Big fish in a little pond is a small fish in a bigger ocean. This is just chud issued at feeding intellectual land sharks of societal evolution.

BuckNaked » 07 Mar 2024, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 5:24 pm

list 5 of them please

1. Conflict. Fani RAN on "getting trump." The prosecutor is required by law to be dispassionate in her duties. If the prosecutor has a personal stake in the case, she cannot file it or be part of it.

2. Conflict. Her lover is leading the prosecution. He wants to please her. This gives him a stake in the case, disqualifying him from being part of the prosecution. 

3. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Mr. Wade. He's billing improperly and sexing up the prosecutor.

4. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is taking emoluments from a man she's overseeing and whose checks she signs off on.

5. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is paying public money to a man she is sleeping with, and those public monies were granted for the hiring of prosecutors - not the flagrant overpaying of her lover for duties that his CV gives no indication he is suited to. 
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 6:03 pm

1. Conflict. Fani RAN on "getting trump." The prosecutor is required by law to be dispassionate in her duties. If the prosecutor has a personal stake in the case, she cannot file it or be part of it.

2. Conflict. Her lover is leading the prosecution. He wants to please her. This gives him a stake in the case, disqualifying him from being part of the prosecution. 

3. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Mr. Wade. He's billing improperly and sexing up the prosecutor.

4. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is taking emoluments from a man she's overseeing and whose checks she signs off on.

5. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is paying public money to a man she is sleeping with, and those public monies were granted for the hiring of prosecutors - not the flagrant overpaying of her lover for duties that his CV gives no indication he is suited to. 
 

1.   I think you got her confused with the black DA in nyc?

5.  What’s CV?

 
 

BuckNaked » 07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm

1.   I think you got her confused with the black DA in nyc?

No, you do. I am referring to fani willis.

BuckNaked » 07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm

5.  What’s CV?

It's like a resume, but for people with fancy jobs that require college.

Skans » 07 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm

I don't know if you're right or not, but I sure as **** love the way you said it!!!

If you think about it, you'll intuit the reason it is true.

Giving the prosecution a "do-over" would be prejudicial to the defense. It would be like starting the game over when one team is in possession with good field position, and making that team kick off.

Prosecutors get ONE BITE at the apple. That's it. No do-overs. You can send in a substitution, but ya can't reset the scoreboard and restart the clock when he takes the field. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:39 pm

No, you do. I am referring to fani willis.

It's like a resume, but for people with fancy jobs that require college.

I have never seen any of fani’s clips when she was running 

BuckNaked » 07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:09 pm

1.   I think you got her confused with the black DA in nyc?

Okay, because of this,^ I went and researched. My information that she ran on a get trump ticket came from trump.

He lied. 

She won the democrat primary before Jan 6 even HAPPENED, and then she ran unopposed because republicans don't even bother in fulton county, AKA afroton county.

So I only gave ya four legit ones - trusting trump's claims made a liar of me. I owe you one.

Here it is: Prosecutorial misconduct - lying under oath. 

Her claims that she paid back the emoluments our intrepid investigator uncovered were absolutely preposterous to anyone above the age of ten. She was caught red handed receiving half a dozen gifts of relatively lavish vacations, and in her defense she insisted that she had wads of cash at all times and she paid her lover back for the vacations with dollars that she cannot account for. 

No one on earth believes a word of it. It is Sharptonesque in its obvious ****.
 

BuckNaked » 07 Mar 2024, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 7:59 pm

I have never seen any of fani’s clips when she was running

She ran unopposed. She did not run on a get trump ticket. That was a trump fabrication.
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 6:03 pm

1. Conflict. Fani RAN on "getting trump." The prosecutor is required by law to be dispassionate in her duties. If the prosecutor has a personal stake in the case, she cannot file it or be part of it.

2. Conflict. Her lover is leading the prosecution. He wants to please her. This gives him a stake in the case, disqualifying him from being part of the prosecution. 

3. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Mr. Wade. He's billing improperly and sexing up the prosecutor.

4. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is taking emoluments from a man she's overseeing and whose checks she signs off on.

5. Prosecutorial misconduct on the part of Ms. Willis. She is paying public money to a man she is sleeping with, and those public monies were granted for the hiring of prosecutors - not the flagrant overpaying of her lover for duties that his CV gives no indication he is suited to. 
 

That is instinctive use of your own brain. wish it happened more often.

I expect the Judge to release his decision by end of day. Will I be right???

Skans » 08 Mar 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 10:11 am

I expect the Judge to release his decision by end of day. Will I be right???

Is 2 weeks over already?

31stArrival » 08 Mar 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 10:42 am

Is 2 weeks over already?

No.  I think its been about 10 days.  If the judge takes the full 2 weeks, he's will show himself to be a lazy government worker.  So, I think it will come out today.
 

Skans » 08 Mar 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:04 am

No.  I think its been about 10 days.  If the judge takes the full 2 weeks, he's will show himself to be a lazy government worker.  So, I think it will come out today.
 

try again. closing arguments were 3/1/2024. I remember making the comment that day the judge was using the Ides of March to release his findings.

the fall of Julius Caesar Et tu brute.

31stArrival » 08 Mar 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:10 am

try again. closing arguments were 3/1/2024. I remember making the comment that day the judge was using the Ides of March to release his findings.

the fall of Julius Caesar Et tu brute.

No need for me to "try again".  You got your own answer.
 

Skans » 08 Mar 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2024, 11:12 am

No need for me to "try again".  You got your own answer.
 

what separates my answer from self evident results? I don't have a one sided conclusion thinking outside a box of secrets.

your mind nurtured after birth
https://i.postimg.cc/9XK6W3vh/Picture-151.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/3wtqVzgz/Picture-152.jpg my brain navigating time since conceived.

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2024, 3:07 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:07 am

And they'd have gotten away with it, too - if it hadn't been for those meddling investigators!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH_1w86Ut-w

It appears they did get away with it!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge- ... athan-wade

Judge rules Fani Willis must step aside from Trump case or fire special prosecutor Nathan Wade

I think the divorce attorney has to go right?

Fuelman » 15 Mar 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Mar 2024, 10:16 am

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge- ... athan-wade

Judge rules Fani Willis must step aside from Trump case or fire special prosecutor Nathan Wade

What the **** about embezzlement of tax payer revenues that didn't go to serving the people with equal justice. Abuse of office, etc??????????????? Oh how soon people forget the true crime against ancestries living under the tyranny of nobody knows more than rule of law suggests possible tomorrow.