Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:26 pm

Duh!


no...your math sucks.

But it did recover sharply, due to federal spending with which you disagreed.

ok.


It was due directly to production cuts for which Grifty claimed credit.


But it's jive like


This is ****...


More ****. See above.


 

no...your math sucks.

But it did recover sharply, due to federal spending with which you disagreed.

****.  Try again.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/188 ... in-the-us/

It was due directly to production cuts for which Grifty claimed credit.

From December 20 through December 30, Today in Energy will feature some of our favorite articles from 2021.

Today’s article was originally published on March 9.U.S. crude oil production averaged 11.3 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2020, down 935,000 b/d (8%) from the record annual average high of 12.2 million b/d in 2019. The 2020 decrease in production was the largest annual decline in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s records. The production decline resulted from reduced drilling activity related to low oil prices in 2020.

 In January 2020, U.S. crude oil production reached a peak of 12.8 million b/d. In March 2020, crude oil prices decreased because of the sudden drop in petroleum demand that resulted from the global response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The declining prices led crude oil operators to shut in wells and limit the number of wells brought online, lowering the output for the major oil-producing regions. In May, U.S. crude oil production reached its lowest average monthly volume for the year at 10.0 million b/d.

It was due directly to production cuts for which Grifty claimed credit.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detai ... 0in%202020.

You are not doing real well here.  That is from a Government Agency run by the Biden Administration.  Surely they aren't lying to us?

That kills your next two excuses.

 
 

ConsRule » 07 Mar 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:44 pm

So...is all that blubbering an admission you lied?

None of that has anything to do with what you said or how I demonstrated you lied.

There was not a vaccine prior to the election.  There was a possible vaccine under development, but that is irrelevant to whether or not people had access to it.  For all intents and purposes, a vaccine that is still under testing and development is not yet a vaccine.  
I didn't lie and you did call me a liar when that is incorrect.

One more thing.  Your retelling on the spending you said I did not support was not complete.

I did not agree that every taxpayer should have gotten them.  Remember?  I said people like me who did not lose a job, who lost NO INCOME, and made what my wife and I made did not need the money.  That money should have gone to those who lost their jobs. 

Get it right.  As I said, you better hope the search feature does not return.

@R. Suave  

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:59 pm

There was not a vaccine prior to the election.  There was a possible vaccine under development, but that is irrelevant to whether or not people had access to it.  For all intents and purposes, a vaccine that is still under testing and development is not yet a vaccine.  
I didn't lie and you did call me a liar when that is incorrect.

Of course there wasn't.  This was explained to you earlier.  It normally takes 5-15 years to create a vaccine.  That was posted earlier.  They only had 9 months until the election.  It was available on Dec 11 th 2020.

They should be applauded for that.  Not turned into one of your talking points.  

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:01 pm

One more thing.  Your retelling on the spending you said I did not support was not complete.

I did not agree that every taxpayer should have gotten them.  Remember?  I said people like me who did not lose a job, who lost NO INCOME, and made what my wife and I made did not need the money.  That money should have gone to those who lost their jobs. 

Get it right.  As I said, you better hope the search feature does not return.

@R. Suave

Must I take time to explain why that is crap?

 

 
Delete

 

 
 Delete
 

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm

Must I take time to explain why that is crap?

 

Go for it.  

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:03 pm

Of course there wasn't.  This was explained to you earlier.  It normally takes 5-15 years to create a vaccine.  That was posted earlier.  They only had 9 months until the election.  It was available on Dec 11 th 2020.

They should be applauded for that.  Not turned into one of your talking points.

Explain that to @ConsRule  . He called me a liar for claiming there wasn't a vaccine on election day.

It is not a "talking point", it is just a fact.  Biden was elected by a population of folks who did not have a vaccine available for the deadly pandemic they found themselves in the midst of.

Biden's administration dealt with rolling out a vaccine that had been created with an entirely new process to a wary public.  They dealt with the global supply chain havoc that the pandemic created.  They dealt with Russia invading Ukraine and what all that did to the global food supply and the global recession that resulted from all that concurrent upheaval.  In fact, the USA did better coming out of the pandemic than nearly anywhere else on the planet and our economy is now in better shape than anyone else's.  If you want to whine about how **** the economy is under Biden, move to some other country whose leaders did a BETTER job than Biden did.  Oh wait... there ARE no such countries.  Quit yer bitchin'.

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:48 pm

****.  Try again.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/188 ... in-the-us/

From December 20 through December 30, Today in Energy will feature some of our favorite articles from 2021.

Today’s article was originally published on March 9.U.S. crude oil production averaged 11.3 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2020, down 935,000 b/d (8%) from the record annual average high of 12.2 million b/d in 2019. The 2020 decrease in production was the largest annual decline in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s records. The production decline resulted from reduced drilling activity related to low oil prices in 2020.

 In January 2020, U.S. crude oil production reached a peak of 12.8 million b/d. In March 2020, crude oil prices decreased because of the sudden drop in petroleum demand that resulted from the global response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The declining prices led crude oil operators to shut in wells and limit the number of wells brought online, lowering the output for the major oil-producing regions. In May, U.S. crude oil production reached its lowest average monthly volume for the year at 10.0 million b/d.

It was due directly to production cuts for which Grifty claimed credit.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detai ... 0in%202020.

You are not doing real well here.  That is from a Government Agency run by the Biden Administration.  Surely they aren't lying to us?

That kills your next two excuses.

Please stop....

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/13/opec-cu ... ergin.html

As the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies came to an agreement on a record cut in oil production, U.S. President Donald Trump may have struck his “biggest and most complex deal,” according to oil expert Dan Yergin.

 “What was so interesting — among many, very interesting things in this unprecedented event — was the turnaround, the pivot by Donald Trump,” Yergin, who is vice chairman at IHS Markit, told CNBC’s “Street Signs” on Monday.

 Just a few weeks ago, Trump had said the early-March plunge in oil prices were “good for the consumer” as it meant lower gasoline prices. That drop in crude prices had been triggered by an oil price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia after Moscow rejected a proposal by OPEC to cut 1.5 million barrels of production per day.
 

Who the **** is "Don Suave"?

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:16 pm

Go for it.

How would you determine eligibility?
Who is gonna do so for 300 million people?
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:42 am

dueling graphs.  How droll.  

And when you consider that Biden inherited a global pandemic that, on election day, had no vaccine, I think he did quite well.  And by ANY measure, the USA has recovered better, stronger, and faster from COVID than any other industrialized first world country.

By the time he was sworn in millions had received the vaccine ..
Stop the BS
 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 3:59 pm

There was not a vaccine prior to the election.  There was a possible vaccine under development, but that is irrelevant to whether or not people had access to it.  For all intents and purposes, a vaccine that is still under testing and development is not yet a vaccine.  
I didn't lie and you did call me a liar when that is incorrect.

You've already been caught lying once about this.

By the time Biden was sworn in there was a vaccine.

Get over it
 

BooRadley » 07 Mar 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:26 pm

You've already been caught lying once about this.

By the time Biden was sworn in there was a vaccine.

Get over it

You better watch it Boo or the Stain is gonna tell you he has you on ignore again...


 

R.Suave » 07 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm

How would you determine eligibility?
Who is gonna do so for 300 million people?
 

 

That's dumb.  We can't figure out who needs it so we will just send them to everyone.

 

maineman » 07 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm

Explain that to @ConsRule  . He called me a liar for claiming there wasn't a vaccine on election day.

It is not a "talking point", it is just a fact.  Biden was elected by a population of folks who did not have a vaccine available for the deadly pandemic they found themselves in the midst of.

Biden's administration dealt with rolling out a vaccine that had been created with an entirely new process to a wary public.  They dealt with the global supply chain havoc that the pandemic created.  They dealt with Russia invading Ukraine and what all that did to the global food supply and the global recession that resulted from all that concurrent upheaval.  In fact, the USA did better coming out of the pandemic than nearly anywhere else on the planet and our economy is now in better shape than anyone else's.  If you want to whine about how **** the economy is under Biden, move to some other country whose leaders did a BETTER job than Biden did.  Oh wait... there ARE no such countries.  Quit yer bitchin'.

 

You are a fucing idiot.  I find it hard to believe you are a Naval Academy Graduate. 

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:31 pm

You are a fucing idiot.  I find it hard to believe you are a Naval Academy Graduate.

what is idiotic about my post?  care to elucidate?



oh... and **** is spelled with a K.

I find it hard to believe you are a high school graduate.

RedheadedStranger » 07 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:28 pm

You better watch it Boo or the Stain is gonna tell you he has you on ignore again...

I expect it soon...


 

Huey » 07 Mar 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 4:30 pm

That's dumb.  We can't figure out who needs it so we will just send them to everyone.

it waa so dumb, GDP nearly bounced back...