Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 07 Mar 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:33 am

I’m talking about practice runs for a controlling shutdown

I know, that's what I am referring to. 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:21 am

You have to have access to the internet...
 

Let's start with that.  No I don't.  I've got plenty of projects I could be working on and probably get finished if I didn't always have to set (some of) you people straight!!!  
 

         




 

Sumela » 07 Mar 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:03 am

         

 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am

and so it begins. I don't know precisely what the "it" is that is beginning, but I believe something is among the horizon. Who is next? 

Yes, I am conspiracy theorist.  If I am right that something sinister is coming, then I have no choice but to gloat and make the doubters feel bad about themselves for the rest of their lives.

https://groundzeromedia.org/5-27-21-cyb ... e-big-lie/

I hope this answers some of your questions .....

 

Majik » 07 Mar 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:53 am

https://groundzeromedia.org/5-27-21-cyb ... e-big-lie/

I hope this answers some of your questions .....

It's a good article, but how does the outages fit in the narrative?

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am

and so it begins. I don't know precisely what the "it" is that is beginning, but I believe something is among the horizon. Who is next? 

Yes, I am conspiracy theorist.  If I am right that something sinister is coming, then I have no choice but to gloat and make the doubters feel bad about themselves for the rest of their lives.

A test run- then the entire **** and shadoole will come down-
dems declare a disaster- blame it on foreigners.   
 

Majik » 07 Mar 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:53 am

https://groundzeromedia.org/5-27-21-cyb ... e-big-lie/

I hope this answers some of your questions .....

Clyde Lewis! bestis radio show. I'm gonna start turning it on again. woo hoo...
 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 11:59 am

It's a good article, but how does the outages fit in the narrative?

Cyber Polygon in 2019 simulated DDoS attacks, web application attacks, and ransomware attacks. The 2020 theme for the event was addressing a digital pandemic and for 2021...

Cyber Polygon in 2021

During the technical exercise, participants will hone their practical skills in mitigating a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real time.

Something further I found which surprise, Next Gen Internet Routing Protocol coupled to the Climate Change narrative...

WEF: Footprints on the path: how routing data could reduce the internet's carbon toll (12 Mar 2021)

Unfortunately, today’s internet architecture is ill-equipped to accommodate such user preferences. The path-discovery mechanism that is used nowadays (a protocol called BGP) provides only a single path between any two points in the internet, offering neither transparency nor choice to users.

To resolve these drawbacks, researchers have been working for over a decade to create a viable alternative. This alternative, the SCION next-generation internet architecture, allows service providers (ISPs) to offer multiple paths to their customers, to augment these paths with valuable information (such as the carbon footprint of the path), and to forward traffic based on their customers’ path choice.

WEF: Our current internet architecture was conceived for the 1980s. It's time for an upgrade (01 Jun 2021)

At ETH Zurich, we have been working on a modern replacement to the ageing BGP. The next generation SCION Internet is designed to be provably stable in the face of major disruptions and even hackers. By “provably” we mean that our researchers, aided by state-of-the-art software, applied “formal verification” to devise mathematical proofs of SCION’s stability.

 

Does SCION make it easier to censor the Internet?

No, SCION makes it strictly harder for a government to censor networks. We are not aware of an attack that a government could perform on SCION that could not be performed on today's Internet. On the other hand, many attacks that are possible in today's Internet, do not work in SCION, for example route hijacking attacks — a SCION path cannot be diverted due to the separation of control and data planes.
SCION FAQ

"Based on the SCION Protocol, this new network is now fully built, tested, and moving towards the 2H 2021 target go-live." @Anapaya Systems

No surprise the Swiss Octagon, Klaus & the Davos crowd are the puppet masters behind all of it.

7-minute video presentation about enabling novel interconnection agreements with path-aware networking architectures to replace BGP.

Recall the story from April: The Mystery of AS8003 where the DOD activated 175 million IP addresses 3 minutes before Biden was sworn-in. I wonder if this has anything to do with the SCION network upgrade for a private, more robust, secure DOD/Mil Internet. 

 
 

Majik » 07 Mar 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:20 pm

Cyber Polygon in 2019 simulated DDoS attacks, web application attacks, and ransomware attacks. The 2020 theme for the event was addressing a digital pandemic and for 2021...

Cyber Polygon in 2021

Something further I found which surprise, Next Gen Internet Routing Protocol coupled to the Climate Change narrative...

WEF: Footprints on the path: how routing data could reduce the internet's carbon toll (12 Mar 2021)

WEF: Our current internet architecture was conceived for the 1980s. It's time for an upgrade (01 Jun 2021)

"Based on the SCION Protocol, this new network is now fully built, tested, and moving towards the 2H 2021 target go-live." @Anapaya Systems

No surprise the Swiss Octagon, Klaus & the Davos crowd are the puppet masters behind all of it.

7-minute video presentation about enabling novel interconnection agreements with path-aware networking architectures to replace BGP.

Recall the story from April: The Mystery of AS8003 where the DOD activated 175 million IP addresses 3 minutes before Biden was sworn-in. I wonder if this has anything to do with the SCION network upgrade for a private, more robust, secure DOD/Mil Internet.

I see, thanks Majik. I can't help think that the Chinese balloons had something to do with all of this, as well. Perhaps surveying our tower infrastructures? 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm

I see, thanks Majik. I can't help think that the Chinese balloons had something to do with all of this, as well. Perhaps surveying our tower infrastructures?

No, not the Chinese....

Yes, to the surprise of absolutely no one, the largest and costliest cyberweapon ever developed (or at least officially acknowledged) was not the product of an Al-CIA-da cyberterror group or even the dreaded "Russian hackers," but the militaries of the US and Israel. Neither should it be surprising to learn that the intelligence agencies have crafted ways of making such cyberweapons appear to have been created by other entities, which is a functionality that is essential to any false flag attack.

We know, for example, that the CIA has already developed the M arble Framework, an anti-forensic tool that "might be used to disguise the CIA’s own hacks to appear as if they were Russian, Chinese, or from specific other countries." In other words, the CIA has spent time and energy developing a way to pin the blame for its own cyberweapons on its enemies. Although the CIA obviously will not confirm why, how or even if Marble has been deployed in the past, there is no other explanation for its existence: it is a tool for enabling virtual false flag terrorism.

This is important because, exactly as the Patriot Act was already ready and waiting in the wings pre-9/11, so, too, is an "iPatriot Act" ready and waiting in the wings for a "cyber 9/11" to come along and justify its enactment

We do not have to speculate about this. It was confirmed by Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig at a conference in 2008. "I had dinner once with Richard Clarke at the table," he told the audience at Fortune's Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California. "And I said, 'Is there an equivalent to the Patriot Act — an iPatriot Act — just sitting, waiting for some substantial event? Just waiting for them to come have the excuse for radically changing the way the Internet works?' And he said, 'Of course there is' — and I swear this is what he said — 'and Vint Cerf is not going to like it very much.'"

So what kinds of things might be contained in such an iPatriot Act? Once again, we don't have to speculate. Various government officials have talked about their wish list for an internet clampdown in recent years.

In March of 2009, Senator Jay Rockefeller opined during a subcommittee hearing that the internet is proving to be such a threat to America’s national security that it would have been better if it had never existed.

Continued.....

In June of 2010, Senator Joe Lieberman stated that he believed the US needed the same ability to shut down the internet as China currently has.

Also in 2010, Microsoft Senior Advisor and Bilderberg attendee Craig Mundie called for the creation of a "World Health Organization for the internet" and suggested creating government-issued licenses to authorize internet usage.

In 2011, Bill Clinton advocated the idea that the US government create an agency for “fact-checking” websites on the internet.

In 2015, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (yes, that NIST) unveiled the "Trusted Identities Group," part of a national strategy for standardizing online identification systems.

Given all of this, it is not hard to imagine how a cyberterror event may play out: A cataclysmic attack on the internet's infrastructure massively disrupts people's online lives for a period of days or weeks. Social media is inaccesible. Online banking and shopping is halted. All news and information during the internet blackout comes from the old, controlled dinosaur media. A shocked and distressed public learn that the Russians (or whatever bogeyman du jour is convenient) are being blamed for the attack. In order to prevent such a thing from reoccurring, emergency legislation is passed in the US (and, coincidentally, in all other Western nations) requiring proof of identity to use any and all internet services.

In one fell swoop, not only would the last vestiges of internet anonymity be eliminated, but a key part of the erection of the social credit control grid would be in place. Now, just like in China, all of your online activity would be tied directly to your social credit score.

 https://www.minds.com/CorbettReport/blo ... 8558407680
 
 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:06 am

and so it begins. I don't know precisely what the "it" is that is beginning, but I believe something is among the horizon. Who is next? 

Yes, I am conspiracy theorist.  If I am right that something sinister is coming, then I have no choice but to gloat and make the doubters feel bad about themselves for the rest of their lives.

I'm not supposed to talk about this...but Q ANON has ultimate control of the internet and can shut it down at any given time..... 

 

Majik » 07 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm

This is important because, exactly as the Patriot Act was already ready and waiting in the wings pre-9/11, so, too, is an "iPatriot Act" ready and waiting in the wings for a "cyber 9/11" to come along and justify its enactment

We do not have to speculate about this. It was confirmed by Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig at a conference in 2008. "I had dinner once with Richard Clarke at the table," he told the audience at Fortune's Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California. "And I said, 'Is there an equivalent to the Patriot Act — an iPatriot Act — just sitting, waiting for some substantial event? Just waiting for them to come have the excuse for radically changing the way the Internet works?' And he said, 'Of course there is' — and I swear this is what he said — 'and Vint Cerf is not going to like it very much.'"

So what kinds of things might be contained in such an iPatriot Act? Once again, we don't have to speculate. Various government officials have talked about their wish list for an internet clampdown in recent years.

In March of 2009, Senator Jay Rockefeller opined during a subcommittee hearing that the internet is proving to be such a threat to America’s national security that it would have been better if it had never existed.

Continued.....

Wow. The Patriot Act is the most dangerous act to Americans that I know of. I didn't know it was ready to go pre-9/11, but I can't be surprised. What a web of corruption and evil our government has spun. 

GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm

I'm not supposed to talk about this...but Q ANON has ultimate control of the internet and can shut it down at any given time..... 

WEF partners with Big Tech and governments to police Internet, encourage ‘coordinated action’ against unauthorized voices deemed ‘harmful’ to collective psyche.

The World Economic Forum announced June 29 it will initiate a new “public-private partnership” with Big Tech and governments around the world to identify and uproot all opinions from the Internet that it considers “harmful.”

The WEF is one of those elitist organizations that wields enormous influence over the elected leaders of Western nations but which almost nobody in the general population has heard of.

(I could not help but think of the Committee of Public Safety that conducted the reign of terror during the French Revolution.)

And who gets to define what’s “harmful”? Why, the global coalition set up by the elitist WEF of course!

The “'harmful content targeted by this Global Coalition for Digital Safety you can bet will be tailor made to entrap those who stand for limited government, traditional values and individual freedom. Those of us who still believe in such things will not be included in the WEF’s definition “inclusive,” “equality” or “diversity.”

“The Global Coalition for Digital Safety is a public private platform for global, multi stakeholder cooperation to develop innovations and advance collaborations that tackle harmful content and conduct online,” states the WEF on its website.

Microsoft immediately announced it was on board with the WEF’s plan to squelch free speech on the Internet.

Technocracy Rising: World Economic Forum Announces ‘Global Coalition For Digital Safety’

Vegas » 07 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm

Wow. The Patriot Act is the most dangerous act to Americans that I know of. I didn't know it was ready to go pre-9/11, but I can't be surprised. What a web of corruption and evil our government has spun.

Now, imagine an internet Patriot Act on a global scale......

 

RedheadedStranger » 07 Mar 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 10:17 am

The Governor of NY just militarized the subway system in NYC as well.

Called in the National Guard even.

https://www.today.com/video/gov-kathy-h ... 5646917779

Something is about to pop.

it's an election year...like the border, it's time to make the dems look good by creating the "we take credit for fixing the problem" even tho they **** it up...and the gladhanding will then ensue...

 
 

Majik » 07 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm

WEF partners with Big Tech and governments to police Internet, encourage ‘coordinated action’ against unauthorized voices deemed ‘harmful’ to collective psyche.

The World Economic Forum announced June 29 it will initiate a new “public-private partnership” with Big Tech and governments around the world to identify and uproot all opinions from the Internet that it considers “harmful.”

The WEF is one of those elitist organizations that wields enormous influence over the elected leaders of Western nations but which almost nobody in the general population has heard of.

(I could not help but think of the Committee of Public Safety that conducted the reign of terror during the French Revolution.)

And who gets to define what’s “harmful”? Why, the global coalition set up by the elitist WEF of course!

The “'harmful content targeted by this Global Coalition for Digital Safety you can bet will be tailor made to entrap those who stand for limited government, traditional values and individual freedom. Those of us who still believe in such things will not be included in the WEF’s definition “inclusive,” “equality” or “diversity.”

“The Global Coalition for Digital Safety is a public private platform for global, multi stakeholder cooperation to develop innovations and advance collaborations that tackle harmful content and conduct online,” states the WEF on its website.

Microsoft immediately announced it was on board with the WEF’s plan to squelch free speech on the Internet.

Technocracy Rising: World Economic Forum Announces ‘Global Coalition For Digital Safety’

How can anyone read about what's happening here and then try to deny the existence of a totalitarian, globally based,  New World Order of some kind...?
Notice how it's almost always the so called "liberals" who obediently  and slavishly deny the existence of any such thing.
They have been trained to believe it's all just a "Right Wing Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy Theory"
I just noticed that the [[[JWO]]] scrubbed this "satire video" from You Tube.
Those of us who are truly "Woke" knew it was only a matter of time before they did. huh...?
https://youtu.be/cl8nRM_wWzs?feature=shared

GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2024, 12:50 pm

How can anyone read about what's happening here and then try to deny the existence of a totalitarian, globally based,  New World Order of some kind...?
Notice how it's almost always the so called "liberals" who obediently  and slavishly deny the existence of any such thing.
They have been trained to believe it's all just a "Right Wing Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy Theory"
I just noticed that the [[[JWO]]] scrubbed this "satire video" from You Tube.
Those of us who are truly "Woke" knew it was only a matter of time before they did. huh...?
https://youtu.be/cl8nRM_wWzs?feature=shared

Sadly, Quite easily ...

You can share links and all the information needed to support what you’re saying, but for some peeple they just can’t accept it....
People’s beliefs and world view are far more important to them than the facts.....
Not too mention that Our governments are continually radicalizing the citizenry against each other by use of the control of information and  the flooding of divisive propaganda.
And it works ....
what other reason would there be to repeal the Smith-Mundt act allowing The federal government to focus propaganda on the American citizenry on American soil.
Which used to be illegal and only used against foreign targets ....







 

A Massachusetts Institute of Technology team the federal government funded to develop AI censorship tools described conservatives, minorities, residents of rural areas, “older adults,” and veterans as “uniquely incapable of assessing the veracity of content online,” says the House report.

People dedicated to sacred texts and American documents such as “the Bible or the Constitution,” the MIT team said, were more susceptible to “disinformation” because they “often focused on reading a wide array of primary sources, and performing their own synthesis.” Such citizens “adhered to deeper narratives that might make them suspicious of any intervention that privileges mainstream sources or recognized experts.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/07/ai ... -the-news/