Liberal Forum

BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:17 am

Obviously you can't answer

I did....

Are you denying that the words are yours?
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am

I did....

Are you denying that the words are yours?

Stop playing games and grow up.

You say all I do is lie..

Well .
What are the lies?
Show us
 

BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:22 am

Stop playing games and grow up.

You say all I do is lie..

Well .
What are the lies?
Show us

I posted your lie, repeatedly.

Stop lying.

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:25 am

I posted your lie, repeatedly.

Stop lying.

Show everyone my lie .
​​​​​​

 

BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:26 am

Show everyone my lie .
​​​​​​

Already did.


 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:27 am

Already did.

Do it again..

Takes about 10 seconds.



 

BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:29 am

Do it again..

Takes about 10 seconds.

Two keystrokes would take 5 seconds.

Since I've already posted your lie, repeatedly, you should answer my question now.

After which I will, again, repost your lie.

Do you understand?
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:34 am

Two keystrokes would take 5 seconds.

Since I've already posted your lie, repeatedly, you should answer my question now.

After which I will, again, repost your lie.

Do you understand?

Show us the lie...

We're waiting 
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 7:34 am

Two keystrokes would take 5 seconds.

Since I've already posted your lie, repeatedly, you should answer my question now.

After which I will, again, repost your lie.

Do you understand?

You keep cowering from a simple question .....

You are blind and a  retarded impish establishment **** tool.
Vigorously Nod.
Your masters are destroying the middle class with illegals .....
The forecast because of AI and robotics  over the next 6 years is the massive layoffs of millions of Americans .....
and those Americans have mortgages and debt and their Academic degrees will become obsolete almost over night ......with very few exceptions.
and that is fact not fiction........same with the projected drop in wages over the next 6 years .....
How will the former middle class compete with Illegals ?
huh?
you little imp.....
 

R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2024, 7:10 am

I don't see the name of a single economist.....

"LibertyNation"?

 

**** moron.

Now proceed to challenge me to debate the substance, MAGAt...

The best way  to do this is to tell us what the article got wrong.

We know that Jan was revised down.

We know that the unemployment rate went up.

We know that the part time job numbers are correct.

So tell us, Math Jammy, what statistics are incorrect.  
 

Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 9:06 am

The best way  to do this is to tell us what the article got wrong.

We know that last month was revised down.

We know that the unemployment rate went up.

We know that the part time job numbers are correct.

So tell us, Math Jammy, what statistics are incorrect.

It tries to use Household Survey data to qualify Establishment Survey data.

That's stupid.

It's why you only find this **** at FOX and "LibertyNation".
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:07 am

It tries to use Houehold Survey data to qualify Establishment Survey data.

That's stupid.

It's why you only find this **** at FOX and "LibertyNation".

 

Oh, so your argument is that the unemployment rate is not 3.9.  And that January was not revised down.  And that a large portion of jobs created are part time or government jobs.

Your argument is that is all incorrect. 

 

Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:09 am

Oh, so your argument is that the unemployment rate is not 3.9.  And that January was not revised down.  And that a large portion of jobs created are part time or government jobs.

Your argument is that is all incorrect.

I told you. Don't translate my direct and comprehensive answer.

That you have no idea what it means is not my problem.


 

Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 9:06 am

The best way  to do this is to tell us what the article got wrong.

We know that last month was revised down.

We know that the unemployment rate went up.

We know that the part time job numbers are correct.

So tell us, Math Jammy, what statistics are incorrect.

Here's what else we now know about those laughable numbers that Biden's touting:

The number of full-time jobs decreased
The number of part-time jobs increased commeasurably
Government jobs increased by 52,000
Real average weekly earnings decreased .3%
Real average hourly earnings increased 1.4 percent, but was offset by a decrease of 1.4 percent in the average workweek resulting in a 0.1-percent decrease in real average weekly earnings
The number of unemployed people increased by 334,000 to 6.5 million.
The unemployment rates for adult women (3.5 percent) and teenagers (12.5 percent) increased over the month.
Social assistance (basically government welfare) added 24,000 jobs in February
The number of people with multiple jobs has increased to the highest level in 5 years
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for December was revised down by 43,000
With these revisions, employment in December and January combined is 167,000 lower than previously reported

And of course, we can expect this month's "revision" will be reduced once again, as we've seen occur regularly as Biden's phony numbers are corrected.
 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Mar 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:17 am

Here's what else we now know about those laughable numbers that Biden's touting:

The number of full-time jobs decreased
The number of part-time jobs increased commeasurably
Government jobs increased by 52,000
Real average weekly earnings decreased .3%
Real average hourly earnings increased 1.4 percent, but was offset by a decrease of 1.4 percent in the average workweek resulting in a 0.1-percent decrease in real average weekly earnings
The number of unemployed people increased by 334,000 to 6.5 million.
The unemployment rates for adult women (3.5 percent) and teenagers (12.5 percent) increased over the month.
Social assistance (basically government welfare) added 24,000 jobs in February
The number of people with multiple jobs has increased to the highest level in 5 years
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for December was revised down by 43,000
With these revisions, employment in December and January combined is 167,000 lower than previously reported

And of course, we can expect this month's "revision" will be reduced once again, as we've seen occur regularly as Biden's phony numbers are corrected.

Zeet,

You lifted this from some **** blog you read.

Name it.
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:15 am

I told you. Don't translate my direct and comprehensive answer.

That you have no idea what it means is not my problem.


 

 

When you make an argument that shows the data in that article from the BLS is incorrect please let me know. 

Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:22 am

When you make an argument that shows the data in that article from the BLS is incorrect please let me know.

I did.


You have no idea what it means.

But it involves statistics...
 

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:22 am

Zeet,

You lifted this from some **** blog you read.

Name it.

Name all these lies of mine ...

R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:24 am

I did.


You have no idea what it means.

But it involves statistics...
 

 

Here is the data:

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2024, 10:25 am

Here is the data:

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Here

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.tn.htm