joe's jobs report has economists laughing...the real numbers...

User avatar
By ROG62
9 Mar 2024 10:32 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User avatar
ROG62
11 Mar 2024 12:34 pm
User avatar
      
34,729 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: you may be a moron, but at least you know to run.
**** RN...no really, ****...
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:34 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: Can you maybe show us a list of all these lies you claim I've made?

Having trouble are we?

​​​​​​
No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.
 
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:35 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
ROG62 » 11 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: **** RN...no really, ****...
No, Moron...I was quite sincere.
Harper Lee
11 Mar 2024 12:35 pm
      
9,454 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.
Nothing huh?

I've asked you numerous to times.

Nothing
 
User avatar
Huey
11 Mar 2024 12:35 pm
User avatar
      
36,849 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: I think if you don't understand the limitations of the Household survey, you should never speak.

 
THere are limitations to the survey.  But there are also limitations to the Establishment survey that the Household Survey covers.

Third time this is posted:

However, the household survey has a more expansive scope than the establishment survey because it includes self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, who are excluded by the establishment survey. The household survey also provides estimates of employment for demographic groups.
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:45 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: THere are limitations to the survey. But there are also limitations to the Establishment survey that the Household Survey covers.

Third time this is posted:

However, the household survey has a more expansive scope than the establishment survey because it includes self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, who are excluded by the establishment survey. The household survey also provides estimates of employment for demographic groups.
Try to focus.


 
User avatar
Zeets2
11 Mar 2024 12:46 pm
User avatar
      
7,254 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: I think if you don't understand the limitations of the Household survey, you should never speak.
I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?

Why don't you explain why you prefer to leave those workers out of the figures when they are all important and vital categories on the employment statistics?
I know you'd damn well insist on including them IF they showed something favorable in Biden's **** economy that you so stupidly love!
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:47 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
 
BooRadley » 10 Mar 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: Lie?

Tell everyone what I've lied about..

Cmon
I challenge you
You never did explain why millions of illegals running around is great news for our country
acknowledge that it's been done.
 
 
R. » wrote:
BooRadley » 10 Mar 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: No you didn't

Show us all these lies
Are these your words?
You never did explain why millions of illegals running around is great news for our country
 

 
 
BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote:
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.
Nothing huh?

I've asked you numerous to times.

Nothing
 

 
You're a liar, Hole.
 
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:48 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
Zeets2 » 11 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?

Why don't you explain why you prefer to leave those workers out of the figures when they are all important and vital categories on the employment statistics?
I know you'd damn well insist on including them IF they showed something favorable in Biden's **** economy that you so stupidly love!
Never presume to explain anything.

You went to a **** college.
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 12:49 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Mar 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: I would like to see you make your "Illegal Aliens are good for our economy" presentation down at  your local Iron Workers Union Hall.
https://iwlocal7.org/
Here's the contact information. 
I am sure they would love to hear from you..!!

Union Hall195 Old Colony Avenue
Boston, MA 02127
(617) 268-4777Fax: (617) 268-7878
1-800-730-IRON (4766)Monday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Tuesday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Wednesday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Thursday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Friday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM

Image
In Boston, the construction industry is riddled with illegals...from Ireland.
 
Harper Lee
11 Mar 2024 12:51 pm
      
9,454 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: In Boston, the construction industry is riddled with illegals...from Ireland.
And in Boston just today the Democrats said they need $1 billion next year for illegals..

That's right..

$1 billion 
 
R. Suave
11 Mar 2024 1:00 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,822 posts
BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: And in Boston just today the Democrats said they need $1 billion next year for illegals..

That's right..

$1 billion
Post your source...

Not one you go looking for, Hole..

 
User avatar
Vegas
11 Mar 2024 1:07 pm
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,945 posts
Zeets2 » 11 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?

Why don't you explain why you prefer to leave those workers out of the figures when they are all important and vital categories on the employment statistics?
I know you'd damn well insist on including them IF they showed something favorable in Biden's **** economy that you so stupidly love!

Zeets, you are wasting time with this clown. Take a look at his replies throughout the thread and many other threads. You won't find one intelligent comment. His posts are riddled with nothing more than insults, random stupidity, and questions/demands. Not one original thought. In fact, if he is reading this, he is going to reply by copy/pasting some random quote of mine that he cherry picked with his notorious "are these your words?" or "**** writes itself." 

The guy can't think. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Bidencrimefamily
11 Mar 2024 1:14 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
8,284 posts
ROG62 » 09 Mar 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the US economy created 275,000 new jobs in February, topping the consensus estimate of 200,000. This was up from the downwardly revised 229,000 in January. The unemployment rate rose to 3.9%, the labor force participation rate was unchanged at 62.5%, and average weekly hours edged up to 34.3. The U-6 unemployment rate – which factors in the unemployed, underemployed, discouraged, and marginally attached – rose to 7.3%.

Additionally, a large portion of the employment gains was concentrated in government or government-funded sectors: health care (67,000), government (52,000), and social assistance (24,000). There were also increases in food services and drinking places (42,000), construction (23,000), and transportation and warehousing (20,000). Manufacturing shed 4,000 positions, while other industries saw little change in their payrolls.

The Fun StuffOne part of the recent jobs report excited economists: revisions. As Liberty Nation has reported over the past year, downward adjustments to the non-farm payrolls report have been fast and furious. In fact, in ten of the last 12 months, the BLS has lowered the official numbers. Of course, nobody cares anymore because outdated information will have little bearing on policymaking.

The federal agency trimmed the December and January employment gains by a combined 167,000, with 75% of it focused on last month’s data. Average hourly earnings were also adjusted downward, with month-over-month and year-over-year readings dipping to 0.5% and 4.4%, respectively.Another notable finding was that full-time employment declined by 187,000, while part-time workers rose by 51,000. Over the last year, the US has seen 900,000 new part-time jobs. By comparison, full-time positions have plummeted by 285,000. Some economists argue that a rise in part-time employment and a drop in full-time can sometimes be seen as a recession indicator.

The household portion of the February jobs report, which politicians on both sides of the aisle wish to avoid, showed the number of employed people falling by 184,000. This side of the monthly report is relevant because it does not duplicate the data as the establishment part does. Plus, the statisticians reported that the number of people working two or more jobs remained above eight million.
 
Finally, there has been a years-long divergence between native- and foreign-born workers. The recent report confirmed that native-born employment was still one million below pre-pandemic levels, while foreign-born employment was 3.3 million above pre-crisis levels. This statistic matters, not because legal immigrants are obtaining jobs, but because the metric includes illegal aliens, or, as the BLS says, “undocumented immigrants.”

https://www.libertynation.com/a-jobs-re ... sts-laugh/

hey swayvee / BFC, how's yer economeeeee lookin' now? stupid ****...
Liberty nation is lying like always. 

You had to go to a hack site to find anything bad didnt you. 

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
 
User avatar
Huey
11 Mar 2024 1:29 pm
User avatar
      
36,849 posts
R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: Try to focus.


 

 
I am not the one who is having issues focusing.  

However, the household survey has a more expansive scope than the establishment survey because it includes self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, who are excluded by the establishment survey. The household survey also provides estimates of employment for demographic groups.

Now take your Adderall and pay attention.  You are being schooled here. There are Pros and Cons associated with both.  
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Mar 2024 1:30 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,993 posts
R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm » wrote: Are these your words?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Mar 2024 1:32 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,993 posts
R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm » wrote: Who do you believe compiles the nominal payroll data?
That would be WHOM, dick sucker.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
​​​​​​​
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Mar 2024 1:32 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,993 posts
R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: I don't see the name of a single economist.....

"LibertyNation"?
 
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Mar 2024 1:33 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,993 posts
R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: Do you understand the difference between the Establishment and Household Surveys?

 
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Mar 2024 1:33 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,993 posts
R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 8:26 am » wrote: Suppose you tell me
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Who is online

In total there are 5980 users online :: 4 registered, 15 bots, and 5961 guests
Bots: MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, proximic, YandexBot, Baidu, ADmantX, Applebot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, CriteoBot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search