**** RN...no really, ****...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you maybe show us a list of all these lies you claim I've made?
Having trouble are we?
No, Moron...I was quite sincere.
Nothing huh?R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.
THere are limitations to the survey. But there are also limitations to the Establishment survey that the Household Survey covers.R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I think if you don't understand the limitations of the Household survey, you should never speak.
Try to focus.Huey » 11 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ THere are limitations to the survey. But there are also limitations to the Establishment survey that the Household Survey covers.
Third time this is posted:
However, the household survey has a more expansive scope than the establishment survey because it includes self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, who are excluded by the establishment survey. The household survey also provides estimates of employment for demographic groups.
I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I think if you don't understand the limitations of the Household survey, you should never speak.
BooRadley » 10 Mar 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Lie?
Tell everyone what I've lied about..
Cmon
I challenge youacknowledge that it's been done.You never did explain why millions of illegals running around is great news for our country
R. » wrote:Are these your words?You never did explain why millions of illegals running around is great news for our country
You're a liar, Hole.BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑Nothing huh?R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I already posted one....you appear incapable of seeing it.
I've asked you numerous to times.
Nothing
Never presume to explain anything.Zeets2 » 11 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?
Why don't you explain why you prefer to leave those workers out of the figures when they are all important and vital categories on the employment statistics?
I know you'd damn well insist on including them IF they showed something favorable in Biden's **** economy that you so stupidly love!
In Boston, the construction industry is riddled with illegals...from Ireland.GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Mar 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ I would like to see you make your "Illegal Aliens are good for our economy" presentation down at your local Iron Workers Union Hall.
https://iwlocal7.org/
Here's the contact information.
I am sure they would love to hear from you..!!
Union Hall195 Old Colony Avenue
Boston, MA 02127
(617) 268-4777Fax: (617) 268-7878
1-800-730-IRON (4766)Monday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Tuesday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Wednesday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Thursday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
Friday: 6:30 AM – 4:30 PM
And in Boston just today the Democrats said they need $1 billion next year for illegals..R.Suave » 11 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑ In Boston, the construction industry is riddled with illegals...from Ireland.
Post your source...BooRadley » 11 Mar 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ And in Boston just today the Democrats said they need $1 billion next year for illegals..
That's right..
$1 billion
Zeets2 » 11 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I see, so you don't like it when the BLS numbers DON'T include self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, which are excluded by the establishment survey?
Why don't you explain why you prefer to leave those workers out of the figures when they are all important and vital categories on the employment statistics?
I know you'd damn well insist on including them IF they showed something favorable in Biden's **** economy that you so stupidly love!
Liberty nation is lying like always.ROG62 » 09 Mar 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the US economy created 275,000 new jobs in February, topping the consensus estimate of 200,000. This was up from the downwardly revised 229,000 in January. The unemployment rate rose to 3.9%, the labor force participation rate was unchanged at 62.5%, and average weekly hours edged up to 34.3. The U-6 unemployment rate – which factors in the unemployed, underemployed, discouraged, and marginally attached – rose to 7.3%.
Additionally, a large portion of the employment gains was concentrated in government or government-funded sectors: health care (67,000), government (52,000), and social assistance (24,000). There were also increases in food services and drinking places (42,000), construction (23,000), and transportation and warehousing (20,000). Manufacturing shed 4,000 positions, while other industries saw little change in their payrolls.
The Fun StuffOne part of the recent jobs report excited economists: revisions. As Liberty Nation has reported over the past year, downward adjustments to the non-farm payrolls report have been fast and furious. In fact, in ten of the last 12 months, the BLS has lowered the official numbers. Of course, nobody cares anymore because outdated information will have little bearing on policymaking.
The federal agency trimmed the December and January employment gains by a combined 167,000, with 75% of it focused on last month’s data. Average hourly earnings were also adjusted downward, with month-over-month and year-over-year readings dipping to 0.5% and 4.4%, respectively.Another notable finding was that full-time employment declined by 187,000, while part-time workers rose by 51,000. Over the last year, the US has seen 900,000 new part-time jobs. By comparison, full-time positions have plummeted by 285,000. Some economists argue that a rise in part-time employment and a drop in full-time can sometimes be seen as a recession indicator.
The household portion of the February jobs report, which politicians on both sides of the aisle wish to avoid, showed the number of employed people falling by 184,000. This side of the monthly report is relevant because it does not duplicate the data as the establishment part does. Plus, the statisticians reported that the number of people working two or more jobs remained above eight million.
Finally, there has been a years-long divergence between native- and foreign-born workers. The recent report confirmed that native-born employment was still one million below pre-pandemic levels, while foreign-born employment was 3.3 million above pre-crisis levels. This statistic matters, not because legal immigrants are obtaining jobs, but because the metric includes illegal aliens, or, as the BLS says, “undocumented immigrants.”
https://www.libertynation.com/a-jobs-re ... sts-laugh/
hey swayvee / BFC, how's yer economeeeee lookin' now? stupid ****...
I am not the one who is having issues focusing.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
That would be WHOM, dick sucker.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ I don't see the name of a single economist.....
"LibertyNation"?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 10 Mar 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Do you understand the difference between the Establishment and Household Surveys?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!