Liberal Forum

Buffalo » 14 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm

Of course she was asked to testify.  Who asked her?  Have them all take lie detector tests and prove they are not lying!!!

The plaintiff.

They've told theirs under oath.

Maybe we should hook Grifty up to that detector.

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm

Actually, it isn't the law yet...will be as of September 1 of this year.

New York expands the legal definition of rape to include many forms of nonconsensual sexual contact | AP News

The current law defines rape as vaginal penetration by a penis. The new law broadens the definition to include nonconsensual anal, oral, and vaginal sexual contact. Highlighting Carroll’s case at a bill signing ceremony in Albany, the Democratic governor said the new definition will make it easier for rape victims to bring cases forward to prosecute perpetrators. The law will apply to sexual assaults committed on or after Sept. 1.

Do you ever pay attention to the news or do you just like making **** up? By the way...it's not my fault you are factually incorrect so often...it's your fault.

Like I said, are you really going to hang your hat on the fact that the law that made his behavior - for which I jury found him guilty -  not technically rape until six months from now even though it is in other states and has been considered rape in under federal guidelines since 2012?  Would you counsel your clown god to hurry up and get all of that forcible finger **** of Big Apple babes out of his system before September because, if he waits, he really COULD be a convicted rapist, instead of just a finger **** sleazebag sexual abuser?  

And I am pleased to know that fraudulent forcible finger-**** are YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!   

R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm

The plaintiff.

They've told theirs under oath.

Maybe we should hook Grifty up to that detector.

Of course, no one EVER lies under oath, you naive idiot!!!  Make them ALL take lie detector tests!!!  Bet that never happens.
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm

Like I said, are you really going to hang your hat on the fact that the law that made his behavior - for which I jury found him guilty -  not technically rape until six months from now even though it is in other states and has been considered rape in under federal guidelines since 2012?  Would you counsel your clown god to hurry up and get all of that forcible finger **** of Big Apple babes out of his system before September because, if he waits, he really COULD be a convicted rapist, instead of just a finger **** sleazebag sexual abuser?  

And I am pleased to know that fraudulent forcible finger-**** are YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!

Careful...it appears you're coming unhinged.

However, it is fun to watch liberals lose control of their emotions over Trump.
 

Buffalo » 14 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm

Of course, no one EVER lies under oath, you naive idiot!!!  Make them ALL take lie detector tests!!!  Bet that never happens.

They've done their part..

Time to waterboard Bubble Boy.

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:29 pm

Careful...it appears you're coming unhinged.

However, it is fun to watch liberals lose control of their emotions over Trump.

tell us about it, Shrilly...

 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm

Like I said, are you really going to hang your hat on the fact that the law that made his behavior - for which I jury found him guilty -  not technically rape until six months from now even though it is in other states and has been considered rape in under federal guidelines since 2012?  Would you counsel your clown god to hurry up and get all of that forcible finger **** of Big Apple babes out of his system before September because, if he waits, he really COULD be a convicted rapist, instead of just a finger **** sleazebag sexual abuser?  

And I am pleased to know that fraudulent forcible finger-**** are YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!

We need as a "Nation & Society" dial it back about roughly half a century..

Wasn't exactly perfect then neither "But" not nearly the Complete "Disaster" we got out there nowadays..

Generally ya could still work & manage try your best ..

Today that's all flipped upside down..

We need 2 get back regain Basic "Common Sense" and really start thinking "Long Term" what is a "Nation & Society" otherwise another decade or two of what we got today just pull the flush lever & piss it all down the drain too..

And the people running it today ain't "Capable" nor up 2 the job neither
 

R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm

They've done their part..

Time to waterboard Bubble Boy.

Yep, they have LIED with impunity!!!  The bitch carroll couldn't even remember the year she was supposedly assaulted and the dress she claimed to be wearing was not in existence until years later.  The law regarding the statue of limitations in New York had to be changed in  order for her to even file the case, ****!!!  
 
 

Buffalo » 14 Mar 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:35 pm

Yep, they have LIED with impunity!!!  The bitch carroll couldn't even remember the year she was supposedly assaulted and the dress she claimed to be wearing was not in existence until years later.  The law regarding the statue of limitations in New York had to be changed in  order for her to even file the case, ****!!!

Imagine getting raped....
And you never tell anyone and can't even remember WHEN it happened?

Didn't Judge Kavanaugh have a similar accuser?
 

R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm

QED.

They testified to being told by Carroll..

That is NOT hearsay.

**** idiot.

Their testimony was based on hearsay you oaf.

I could go tell your neighbor that I caught you **** a goat, and that would be hearsay too... probably true, but hearsay just the same.

I thought you said you went to college?
 

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:29 pm

Careful...it appears you're coming unhinged.

However, it is fun to watch liberals lose control of their emotions over Trump.

I am not at all unhinged.  Your selective morality is really something to behold.

The behavior you condone is unbelievable.

 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm

I am not at all unhinged.  Your selective morality is really something to behold.

The behavior you condone is unbelievable.

Who said I condone it...other than you?

Quote my post where I said I condone the behavior or shut the **** up.
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm

And I am pleased to know that fraudulent forcible finger-**** are YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!

Add the word, prepubescent, to your description and you'll have YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!

RebelGator » 14 Mar 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 2:58 pm

Add the word, prepubescent, to your description and you'll have YOUR KIND OF PRESIDENT!

actually... that is all baseless supposition.  My comment has a jury verdict to back it up.

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm

Who said I condone it...other than you?

Quote my post where I said I condone the behavior or shut the **** up.

are you planning on voting for him?

I think that is a pretty strong indication of support.


 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 2:52 pm

I am not at all unhinged.  Your selective morality is really something to behold.

The behavior you condone is unbelievable.

And you defended Ted Kennedy who left a woman to drown in his car....
Remember?

"She was a slut"
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 3:08 pm

are you planning on voting for him?

I think that is a pretty strong indication of support.

Voting for a candidate is (for me) based on their position on issues.  I understand, unlike most, a President can only accomplish what Congress lets them accomplish (unless it can be done with an EO).  I would only consider the morals of a candidate if all other factors are equal since I don't look to politicians for moral/ethical guidance.  This will be my 13th Presidential election to vote...so far there has never been a situation where all factors are equal.  Right now, I'm leaning toward leaving the Presidential race blank. 
 

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm

Voting for a candidate is (for me) based on their position on issues.  I understand, unlike most, a President can only accomplish what Congress lets them accomplish (unless it can be done with an EO).  I would only consider the morals of a candidate if all other factors are equal since I don't look to politicians for moral/ethical guidance.  This will be my 13th Presidential election to vote...so far there has never been a situation where all factors are equal.  Right now, I'm leaning toward leaving the Presidential race blank.

A President can only accomplish what a partisan, deep state, ingrained bureaucratic apparatchiks allows him to.   THAT was what Trump was up against, a mutinous deep state swamp that hijacked him at every chance.  It is amazing he was able to accomplish what he did with so many plotting against him.
 He still scares the hell out of them, thus his lawfare persecution.
 

ConsRule » 14 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 3:33 pm

Voting for a candidate is (for me) based on their position on issues.  I understand, unlike most, a President can only accomplish what Congress lets them accomplish (unless it can be done with an EO).  I would only consider the morals of a candidate if all other factors are equal since I don't look to politicians for moral/ethical guidance.  This will be my 13th Presidential election to vote...so far there has never been a situation where all factors are equal.  Right now, I'm leaning toward leaving the Presidential race blank.

This will be my 14th and I have never voted for a rapist.

maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2024, 8:26 pm

This will be my 14th and I have never voted for a rapist.

If you voted for Biden, you've not only voted for a rapist (by your definition) but a pedophile too.