Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Using maineBITCH logic, we have this.....
Using maineBITCH logic, we have this.....
By Beekeeper
13 Mar 2024 7:02 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
14 Mar 2024 8:33 pm
14 Mar 2024 8:42 pm
maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ "Redheaded Stranger, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post."
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Mar 2024 8:52 pm
14 Mar 2024 8:57 pm
Everyone knows you're a chicken **** already Stain.maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Redheaded Stranger, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
You don't have to keep reminding us.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Mar 2024 9:03 pm
Redheaded Stranger, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
Rippy knows that he richly earned and deserves my disdain. He keeps trying to taunt me, but he lost any claim to an honest debate with me long ago and he knows exactly why.
Display this post.
Rippy knows that he richly earned and deserves my disdain. He keeps trying to taunt me, but he lost any claim to an honest debate with me long ago and he knows exactly why.
14 Mar 2024 9:35 pm
Oh good Lord...maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Redheaded Stranger, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
Rippy knows that he richly earned and deserves my disdain. He keeps trying to taunt me, but he lost any claim to an honest debate with me long ago and he knows exactly why.
You got your feelings hurt because I kept calling you out for lying and being totally disingenuous while you kept claiming to be forthright and honest.
I could care less if you reply to me or not, or even read my posts. I'll keep making them and calling your **** out just the same... and everyone else will keep seeing them too.
Just keep being a chicken ****. It's what you do best.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Mar 2024 9:38 pm
One hopes they matured.Mrkelly » 13 Mar 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Not long ago
you guys were cheering this on as a “young man’s dream” to be gotten stoned and to be **** by a teacher
what happened?
Hopes against hope, mind.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 9:40 pm
"And guess what - they're still married."Mrkelly » 13 Mar 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Sick **** on both sides
https://youtube.com/shorts/9H6UJ-uCrgc? ... ev5aoYOJZk
The wrongness is un-unpackable. It is self-sealing and impregnable.
It is not to be unpacked ever, lest it cause a ripple in the space-time-continuum.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 9:41 pm
When I was in 10th grade I wanted to **** my French teacher so bad I could taste it... as did every other guy in the class.
She was 25 and just out of college, and dressed the French school marm part daily.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Mar 2024 9:42 pm
So that's what you've got - Kaplan said so.R.Suave » 13 Mar 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Well, fruitcake, if we can't trust Kaplan, who CAN we trust - you **** skifooza.
Beekeeper's claim stands unrebutted and unaddressed. No criminal conviction of Trump for rape OR sexual assault.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 9:49 pm
And the fact that an activist judge openly lied that the jury did not mean what they said they meant bamboozles the fruitcake - because he WANTS to be bamboozled.Buffalo » 13 Mar 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ Even though bitch carroll couldn't even remember the year, much less the month, that the alleged assault took place and LIED about the dress she was wearing. New York had to change the law on statutes of limitations for the lying bitch to even file this absurdity. Just more political persecution of Trump!!!
Only ****, liberal idiots and crooked, partisan dim-0-crap prosecutors and judges believe her lying ****!!!
Never forget, this **** doesn't know a male toddler from a female without having to ASK.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 9:50 pm
If every woman I ever wanted to **** had **** me, I would probably be in an asylum. ESPECIALLY if they had done so, starting when I was 12 years old.RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ When I was in 10th grade I wanted to **** my French teacher so bad I could taste it... as did every other guy in the class.
She was 25 and just out of college, and dressed the French school marm part daily.
Hell, I would **** a TREE at 12 years old.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 10:34 pm
Your last sentence here is ambiguously crafted.Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ If every woman I ever wanted to **** had **** me, I would probably be in an asylum. ESPECIALLY if they had done so, starting when I was 12 years old.
Hell, I would **** a TREE at 12 years old.
If you had said, "Hell, I would HAVE **** a tree when I was 12 years old", that kind of characterizes the whole testosterone storm that most men experience.
Saying, "hell I would **** a tree at twelve years old", as you wrote, might suggest that, even today, at whatever the **** age you are, you'd **** a tree who had twelve years' worth of age rings.
Maybe you need to further refine your statement to clarify your intent here.
or not.
14 Mar 2024 10:38 pm
Fair enough.maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Your last sentence here is ambiguously crafted.
If you had said, "Hell, I would HAVE **** a tree when I was 12 years old", that kind of characterizes the whole testosterone storm that most men experience.
Saying, "hell I would **** a tree at twelve years old", as you wrote, might suggest that, even today, at whatever the **** age you are, you'd **** a tree who had twelve years' worth of age rings.
Maybe you need to further refine your statement to clarify your intent here.
or not.
When I was twelve, I was fairly well known in the neighborhood as that kid that **** trees.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Mar 2024 10:47 pm
and it is a reputation callout that garners you YUGE amounts of street credit even to this day.Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2024, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Fair enough.
When I was twelve, I was fairly well known in the neighborhood as that kid that **** trees.
14 Mar 2024 10:57 pm
"He's got wood" was the whisper that went around when I showed up.maineman » 14 Mar 2024, 10:47 pm » wrote: ↑ and it is a reputation callout that garners you YUGE amounts of street credit even to this day.
"He can't see the forest for the trees," they would whisper.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
15 Mar 2024 7:15 am
RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 9:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh good Lord...
You got your feelings hurt because I kept calling you out for lying and being totally disingenuous while you kept claiming to be forthright and honest.
I could care less if you reply to me or not, or even read my posts. I'll keep making them and calling your **** out just the same... and everyone else will keep seeing them too.
Just keep being a chicken ****. It's what you do best.
@maineman 's modis operantae!! He gets his *** KICKED MASSIVELY INTO A BLOOD PULP, and then he puts you on ignore!!
Claims "you lost the right to debate me" and "you know why"!!
Its's called being the YELLOW STRIPED COWARD PIECE OF **** that he is.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Mar 2024 7:29 am
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Left wages war: Blue laws for red citizens
Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Content Agency
February 24, 2024 - 9:01 pm
One state prosecutor and one civilian plaintiff have already won huge fines and damages from Donald Trump that may, with legal costs, exceed $500 million.
Trump awaits further civil and criminal liability in three other federal, state and local indictments.
There are eerie commonalities in all these five court cases involving plaintiff E. Jean Carroll, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James, federal special counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
One, they are either unapologetically left wing or associated with liberal causes. They filed their legal writs in big-city, left-wing America — Atlanta, New York, Washington — where liberal judges and jury pools predominate in a manner not characteristic of the country at large.
Two, they are overtly political. Bragg, James, and Willis have either campaigned for office or raised campaign funds by promising to get or even destroy Trump.
Carroll’s suit was funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman.
Smith sued to rush his court schedule in hopes of putting Trump on trial before the November election.
Three, there would not be any of these cases had Trump not run for the presidency or not been a conservative.
Carroll’s suit bypassed statute of limitation restrictions by prompting the intervention of a left-wing New York legislator. He passed a special bill, allowing a one-year window to waive the statute of limitations for sexual assault claims from decades past.
Until Trump, no New York prosecutor such as James had ever filed a civil suit against a business for allegedly overvaluing real estate assets to obtain loans that bank auditors approved and were paid back in full, on time and with sizable interest profits to the lending institutions.
Bragg bootstrapped a Trump private nondisclosure agreement into a federal campaign violation in a desperate effort to find something on Trump.
Smith is also charging Trump with insurrectionary activity. But Trump had never been so charged with insurrection, much less convicted of it.
Willis strained to find a way to criminalize Trump’s complaints about his loss of Georgia in the 2020 national election. She finally came up with a racketeering charge, usually more applicable to mafiosi and drug cartels.
Four, in all these cases, the charges could have been equally applicable to fellow left-wing public figures and officials.
Joe Biden, like Trump, was accused of sexual assault decades earlier by former staffer Tara Reade. Yet Reade was torn apart by the media and the left for inconsistencies in her memory. By contrast, the wildly inconsistent and amnesiac Carroll won $83 million from Trump.
Smith created the precedent of charging Trump for unlawfully removing classified files to his private residence.
But the government simultaneously did not charge Biden for similar offenses. Yet Biden had removed files not for two years but for more than 30. He stored them not in one location but several.
His rickety garage was a mess, not a secure family compound such as Trump’s estate. Moreover, Biden did so while a senator and vice president, without any presidential authority to declassify almost any presidential document he wished.
Biden never came forward to report the crime for over 30 years — until Trump was charged. Indeed, he was caught on tape six years ago, admitting to his ghostwriter that he possessed classified files but never reported it.
Victor Davis Hanson Tribune Content Agency
February 24, 2024 - 9:01 pm
One state prosecutor and one civilian plaintiff have already won huge fines and damages from Donald Trump that may, with legal costs, exceed $500 million.
Trump awaits further civil and criminal liability in three other federal, state and local indictments.
There are eerie commonalities in all these five court cases involving plaintiff E. Jean Carroll, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James, federal special counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
One, they are either unapologetically left wing or associated with liberal causes. They filed their legal writs in big-city, left-wing America — Atlanta, New York, Washington — where liberal judges and jury pools predominate in a manner not characteristic of the country at large.
Two, they are overtly political. Bragg, James, and Willis have either campaigned for office or raised campaign funds by promising to get or even destroy Trump.
Carroll’s suit was funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman.
Smith sued to rush his court schedule in hopes of putting Trump on trial before the November election.
Three, there would not be any of these cases had Trump not run for the presidency or not been a conservative.
Carroll’s suit bypassed statute of limitation restrictions by prompting the intervention of a left-wing New York legislator. He passed a special bill, allowing a one-year window to waive the statute of limitations for sexual assault claims from decades past.
Until Trump, no New York prosecutor such as James had ever filed a civil suit against a business for allegedly overvaluing real estate assets to obtain loans that bank auditors approved and were paid back in full, on time and with sizable interest profits to the lending institutions.
Bragg bootstrapped a Trump private nondisclosure agreement into a federal campaign violation in a desperate effort to find something on Trump.
Smith is also charging Trump with insurrectionary activity. But Trump had never been so charged with insurrection, much less convicted of it.
Willis strained to find a way to criminalize Trump’s complaints about his loss of Georgia in the 2020 national election. She finally came up with a racketeering charge, usually more applicable to mafiosi and drug cartels.
Four, in all these cases, the charges could have been equally applicable to fellow left-wing public figures and officials.
Joe Biden, like Trump, was accused of sexual assault decades earlier by former staffer Tara Reade. Yet Reade was torn apart by the media and the left for inconsistencies in her memory. By contrast, the wildly inconsistent and amnesiac Carroll won $83 million from Trump.
Smith created the precedent of charging Trump for unlawfully removing classified files to his private residence.
But the government simultaneously did not charge Biden for similar offenses. Yet Biden had removed files not for two years but for more than 30. He stored them not in one location but several.
His rickety garage was a mess, not a secure family compound such as Trump’s estate. Moreover, Biden did so while a senator and vice president, without any presidential authority to declassify almost any presidential document he wished.
Biden never came forward to report the crime for over 30 years — until Trump was charged. Indeed, he was caught on tape six years ago, admitting to his ghostwriter that he possessed classified files but never reported it.
15 Mar 2024 7:30 am
Bragg might have noticed that both Hillary Clinton (fined $113,000) and Barack Obama (fined $350,000) broke campaign financing laws. Neither was subject to federal criminal charges by local prosecutors.
An array of left-wing celebrities, politicians, 2004 House members, former Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams have all recently challenged elections. They sought either to delay or redo ballot counting or, on the federal level, to sidetrack electors to ignore popular votes in their respective states.
These lawfare cases are part of other efforts that were highly partisan and without merit. Recall the Trump “Russian collusion” hoax and the “Russian disinformation” laptop farce.
In another first, some blue states are suing to take Trump’s name off the ballot for “insurrection,” a crime for which he has never been charged.
Total up the deaths, damage and length of the summer 2020 antifa/BLM riots. Then compare the tally to the one-day Jan. 6 riot.
The former proved far more lethal, long-lasting and destructive. Yet very few of the 14,000 arrested rioters in 2020 were ever prosecuted, much less convicted.
By contrast, the Biden administration sought to jail hundreds for crimes allegedly committed on Jan. 6, such as “illegal parading.”
We are entering a dangerous era in America.
Ideology and party affiliations increasingly determine guilt and punishment. Opponents are first targeted, and then laws are twisted and redefined to convict them.
The left is waging lawfare with the implicit message to political opponents: Either keep quiet or suffer the consequences.
An array of left-wing celebrities, politicians, 2004 House members, former Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams have all recently challenged elections. They sought either to delay or redo ballot counting or, on the federal level, to sidetrack electors to ignore popular votes in their respective states.
These lawfare cases are part of other efforts that were highly partisan and without merit. Recall the Trump “Russian collusion” hoax and the “Russian disinformation” laptop farce.
In another first, some blue states are suing to take Trump’s name off the ballot for “insurrection,” a crime for which he has never been charged.
Total up the deaths, damage and length of the summer 2020 antifa/BLM riots. Then compare the tally to the one-day Jan. 6 riot.
The former proved far more lethal, long-lasting and destructive. Yet very few of the 14,000 arrested rioters in 2020 were ever prosecuted, much less convicted.
By contrast, the Biden administration sought to jail hundreds for crimes allegedly committed on Jan. 6, such as “illegal parading.”
We are entering a dangerous era in America.
Ideology and party affiliations increasingly determine guilt and punishment. Opponents are first targeted, and then laws are twisted and redefined to convict them.
The left is waging lawfare with the implicit message to political opponents: Either keep quiet or suffer the consequences.
15 Mar 2024 7:34 am
Excellent post..Buffalo » 15 Mar 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ Bragg might have noticed that both Hillary Clinton (fined $113,000) and Barack Obama (fined $350,000) broke campaign financing laws. Neither was subject to federal criminal charges by local prosecutors.
An array of left-wing celebrities, politicians, 2004 House members, former Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams have all recently challenged elections. They sought either to delay or redo ballot counting or, on the federal level, to sidetrack electors to ignore popular votes in their respective states.
These lawfare cases are part of other efforts that were highly partisan and without merit. Recall the Trump “Russian collusion” hoax and the “Russian disinformation” laptop farce.
In another first, some blue states are suing to take Trump’s name off the ballot for “insurrection,” a crime for which he has never been charged.
Total up the deaths, damage and length of the summer 2020 antifa/BLM riots. Then compare the tally to the one-day Jan. 6 riot.
The former proved far more lethal, long-lasting and destructive. Yet very few of the 14,000 arrested rioters in 2020 were ever prosecuted, much less convicted.
By contrast, the Biden administration sought to jail hundreds for crimes allegedly committed on Jan. 6, such as “illegal parading.”
We are entering a dangerous era in America.
Ideology and party affiliations increasingly determine guilt and punishment. Opponents are first targeted, and then laws are twisted and redefined to convict them.
The left is waging lawfare with the implicit message to political opponents: Either keep quiet or suffer the consequences.
Careful..
You might end up on ignore
Who is online
In total there are 3385 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 3360 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckGo, facebookexternalhit, Not, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, YandexBot, bingbot, ADmantX, curl/7, Baiduspider