Explain to me again what hearsay is genius...R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Another slack jaw crash&burn.
These Grifter rubes should be left to starve...
Too stupid to feed.
the "anonymous" source is a Secret Service agent in the vehicle whose testimony was pulled from the transcript of your slackjawed j6 committee hearings, numbnuts...R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ 1 anonymous source.
was the source present at the conversation between Ornato and Cassidy?
Has Ornato denied it, under oath?
I'm sure we'll get a runner.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom the red line was on the last ship that sailed out to sea at least a decade ago...Majik » 14 Mar 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Rog the real questions are .....
Do they even have a red line that they won't Cross to remain in power ?
and how can this county survive their treachery.....?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom rico's already hard at it with a full Monty unnamed source attack, blah, blah, blah...RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ You're going to upset Rico terribly with stuff like this ROG.
Cassidy is one of his heros don't you know!
As for the question at the end of your post... the answer is no.
They will lie cheat and steal at every turn to stay in power.
Some "democracy" huh?
.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Sure...
Yep....ROG62 » 14 Mar 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ the red line was on the last ship that sailed out to sea at least a decade ago...
Long walk to Houston.
Runner...as predicted.ROG62 » 14 Mar 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ the "anonymous" source is a Secret Service agent in the vehicle whose testimony was pulled from the transcript of your slackjawed j6 committee hearings, numbnuts...
The two witnesses weren't testifying to the rape. They were testifying to having been told of it by Carroll at the time it occurred.
What they testified to was hearsay.R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The two witnesses weren't testifying to the rape. They were testifying to having been told of it by Carroll at the time it occurred.
That is not hearsay.
Seriously, you're an idiot.
R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ You mean, like, having told people about it contemporaneously?
Fingerprints?
No, you **** idiot.RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ What they testified to was hearsay.
All they had was the moonbat's word that what she claims happened actually happened.
The had zero proof that anything actually occurred.
Like I said, I could tell your neighbor that I saw you **** a goat... and by your logic, you were actually **** that goat, because your neighbor testifies that somebody told them you were.
THAT is hearsay, and should have never even been allowed as any type of evidence in the case.
Brown clown.
Now what about these fingerprints you claimed Carroll had?
Your words...
Move over Clem....there's a new moron in town.Now what about these fingerprints you claimed Carroll had?
They testified that they heard something... and had zero way of knowing if what they heard was true or not.R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you **** idiot.
They were party to the conversations.
To which they testified.
You're a brick.
Move over Clem....there's a new moron in town.
you **** slackjaw...I'm sure your buddy, pencilneck and **** the schiff, penciled it into record that way...you know, so that if it ever came out, they couldn't name him?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He's had his *** handed to him on all fronts on this thread and he can't handle it.ROG62 » 14 Mar 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ you **** slackjaw...I'm sure your buddy, pencilneck and **** the schiff, penciled it into record that way...you know, so that if it ever came out, they couldn't name him?
Just answer the questions.ROG62 » 14 Mar 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ you **** slackjaw...I'm sure your buddy, pencilneck and **** the schiff, penciled it into record that way...you know, so that if it ever came out, they couldn't name him?
You forgot to tell him NOW DAMNIT!
You're so **** thick.RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ They testified that they heard something... and had zero way of knowing if what they heard was true or not.
By definition, that's hearsay.
Are you just being obtuse or are you really this **** stupid?
I'm going with the latter.
And YOU are the one that mentioned "fingerprints"... not me... as evidenced by the quote.
Your words.
nod
(now strike it through and accept your *** whooping like a good little bitch)
I grasp that the ONLY "evidence" Carroll had was two witnesses saying she told them Trump assaulted her in a dressing room.R.Suave » 14 Mar 2024, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You're so **** thick.
They only testified to what they knew, specifically that Carroll told them about the incident when it occurred. That was the ONLY purpose of their appearance. Not the details, just the fact that she told them at the time.
Can you grasp this?
**** *******.
They DID rig it, by seeing to it that Trump was the nominee. They thought they had it in the bag with the October surprise, which they had in reserve, of the "locker room talk" tape. They considered Trump to be incapable of overcoming that. They figured every woman in America would turn against him. They simply overlooked how hated hillary was - by virtually everyone. Everyone knew she was never nominated, but coronated. Everyone knew the system ripped off Bernie. The Bernie wing of the democ rat party stayed home.Mrkelly » 14 Mar 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ wonder why they didnt rig the election for her?
she was way ahead in the polls
must have liked tRump more I guess
You're a **** idiot.RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I grasp that the ONLY "evidence" Carroll had was two witnesses saying she told them Trump assaulted her in a dressing room.
It's no different that Cassidy said " she heard" that Trump did this and that.
It's hearsay, anyway you slice it.
Oh, and BTW... I accept your concession. (the strike through is your white flag).
Have another bong hit and kill a few more of the few functional brain cells you have left, idiot.