Mrkelly » 15 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me any of that from me Goober
Im glad that you see defending a girl that got raped by her dad as “a talking point”
what a maroon
Mrkelly » 15 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me any of that from me Goober
Im glad that you see defending a girl that got raped by her dad as “a talking point”
what a maroon
Show me any evidence of that gooberBeekeeper » 15 Apr 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ But you STILL want to MURDER BABIES!!!
THAT you can't deny in ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER!!! THAT is your "talking point" and one you use as you are HERE, ****!!!
Your VERY WORDS belie your DESIRE TO KEEP KILLING BABIES, ****!!maineman » 15 Apr 2024, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ babies have been born. Nobody I know is supportive of killing babies. Many people want to give women the right to terminate the lump of reproducing cells in their uteruses if they don't WANT to be pregnant. They don't want to kill babies. Many women find, late in their pregnancies, that their fetus has fatal birth defects. They don't want to kill babies. Many women find, late in their pregnancies, that their own lives are at immediate danger if the pregnancy continues, They don't want to kill babies, either. I don't even talk to people who routinely refer to abortion as killing babies. They are being intentionally irritating.
Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ Show me any evidence of that goober
I have said that I dont think that a woman or child that has been raped should be forced to produce the animals offspring
you do
you have made that very clear
you defend an animal’s right to reproduce by raping women and childrenBeekeeper » 16 Apr 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ If you "terminate" that baby, you killed it. PERIOD!!
You support the MURDER of babies. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE DEFINITION OF MURDER IS?? OTHER than the INTENTIONAL TAKING OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEINGS LIFE. And a BABY IN THE MOTHERS WOMB IS A LIFE AND ONE YOU WANT TO MURDER!!
Next you're going to want to round up all the kids of rapists and child molesters and MURDER THEM TOO since these "animals" as you call them, had kids that aren't worthy of life based on the standards YOU SET!!!
Because Beekeeper is a rape baby himself.Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ you defend an animal’s right to reproduce by raping women and children
I get it Goober
Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ you defend an animal’s right to reproduce by raping women and children
I get it Goober
Beekeeper » 16 Apr 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. I defend the RIGHT TO HAVE A LIFE OF AN UNBORN BABY!!!
YOU want to call them "monsters" and "animals" and want to MURDER ANY CHILDREN THEY HAPPEN TO CONCEIVE!! What's next?? Round up any kids they had in the past and MURDER THEM TOO since their offspring are UNWORTHY OF LIFE???
Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑the rapist is just a misunderstood person that deserves the right to rape women and children so he can reproduce
![]()
or maybe an innocent dad that just happens to get his daughter pregnant![]()
we need more like them according to you
how many times are you going to say it?
those are you words GooberBeekeeper » 16 Apr 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ YOU putting words in MY MOUTHY is typical of a COCK SUCKING *** like you LWNUJs all are!!
The FACT IS, you want to MURDER BABIES THAT YOU DON'T AGREE WITH WHERE or HOW THEY WERE CONCEIVED!! PERIOD!!
AND you fail to realize that ADOPTION is a grand option for those "unwanted babies" you feel need to be TERMINATED/MURDERED!!
I'm not trying to speak for Beekeeper here but if anyone should die, it should be the piece of **** rapist that got the girl pregnant during the commission of the heinous crime, and not the innocent child.Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑the rapist is just a misunderstood person that deserves the right to rape women and children so he can reproduce
![]()
or maybe an innocent dad that just happens to get his daughter pregnant![]()
we need more like them according to you
how many times are you going to say it?
Sounds reasonable*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not trying to speak for Beekeeper here but if anyone should die, it should be the piece of **** rapist that got the girl pregnant during the commission of the heinous crime, and not the innocent child.
In cases of rape or incest, my preferred recourse would be to put the piece of **** rapist down immediately (if they are in custody) and allow the victim the option of termination only after all other options have been presented and discussed with her beforehand.
Just my .02
That's been my position for years actually.maineman » 16 Apr 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ it does, but even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.
Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ those are you words Goober
a rapist deserves to reproduce by raping women and children
a dad has the right to make his own grandchildren by raping his daughter
your words… not mine
I have to agree with Beekeeper here.Mrkelly » 16 Apr 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ those are you words Goober
a rapist deserves to reproduce by raping women and children
a dad has the right to make his own grandchildren by raping his daughter
your words… not mine