ROG62 » 10 Apr 2024, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ WTF is wrong with people?
The mother needs to be put down like the piece of **** for a human being she is....along with everyone involved....
So many of your friends disagree with you and vote with youmaineman » 11 Apr 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ no minors should be able to undergo gender reassignment surgery. It is a decision that only a consenting adult can make, IMHO.
We're a country of laws, not your feefees.*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ All that bloviating still doesn't change the fact that you've yet to condemn mutilating an 11 year old boy's genitals.
You own that position at this point, sick bastard.
The ***'s shtick is to blow sjw's out of the water - with him holding the mic, of course.righteous » 10 Apr 2024, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ JUST READ THE ARTICLE.
HE'S YOUR TYPICAL ZIONIST NEOCON. PRO-ISRAEL, PRO VAX, WHITE AMERICAN REPLACEMENT
HOPE HIS DAILY WIRE SINKS LIKE NETANYAHU.
AND THE COURT SYSTEMS IN THE URBAN CITIES OF BOTH TEXAS AND CALIFORNIA ARE CONTROLLED BY RADICAL LUNATIC LEFTISTSR.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ who’s been backed by the court systems of both Texas and California
Legal/shmegal...
The Rape Apologists, naturally, are incensed.
@ROG62
@rippy 38
Jake Shields has a great Twitter feedCannonpointer » 10 Apr 2024, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Great site- I found this over there. Warmed my cockles.
https://nationalfile.com/ben-shapiro-ha ... -downfall/
+1000maineman » 11 Apr 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ no minors should be able to undergo gender reassignment surgery. It is a decision that only a consenting adult can make, IMHO.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom WGAFF? it doesn't make it right just because some schmuck judge is forced to accept some **** narrative...R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ who’s been backed by the court systems of both Texas and California
Legal/shmegal...
The Rape Apologists, naturally, are incensed.
@ROG62
@rippy 38

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 14 Apr 2024, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ WGAFF? it doesn't make it right just because some schmuck judge is forced to accept some **** narrative...
TWO state courts.because some schmuck judge is forced to accept
Can't Understand Normal Thinking...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Don't care about rape apologists' feefees.
Wrong.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ Wow...
Roomfuls of lawyers in TWO states, deliberating over evidence supplied by medical professionals, are obviously wrong.
On another thread, ONE lawyer, playing with an employment survey in a manner for which it wasn't intended, is "dispositive".
You're a **** idiot.
This has nothing to do with me...*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
The only thing TX did was allowed the mentally ill mother take their son to California.
Castrating 11 year old boy's is still illegal in Texas, as it should be everywhere.
Of course if it was, that would make you sad.
No, it's about you not only seeing nothing wrong with castrating an 11 year old boy, but supporting the mom's "right" to do so as well.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑ This has nothing to do with me...
It is about you visualizing some boy's genitals to get your Outrage Rocks off...
Sick ****.R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ are you talking about a legal RIGHT established by 2 state courts?
I see something terribly wrong with you asserting "moral authority".*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it's about you not only seeing nothing wrong with castrating an 11 year old boy, but supporting the mom's "right" to do so as well.
Sick ****.
I'm not the one advocating for the castration of an 11 year old boy.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I see something terribly wrong with you asserting "moral authority".
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A GUY THAT HAD A PENECTOMY AND VAGINOPLASTY.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not the one advocating for the castration of an 11 year old boy.
That would be you... ya sick ****.
\this is wrong the courts do not make it right.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ who’s been backed by the court systems of both Texas and California
Legal/shmegal...
The Rape Apologists, naturally, are incensed.
@ROG62
@rippy 38
----------------------------------------------------------R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ Wow...
Roomfuls of lawyers in TWO states, deliberating over evidence supplied by medical professionals, are obviously wrong.
On another thread, ONE lawyer, playing with an employment survey in a manner for which it wasn't intended, is "dispositive".
You're a **** idiot.