Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
CALIFORNIA FREAK SHOW
CALIFORNIA FREAK SHOW
By righteous
10 Apr 2024 9:36 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
14 Apr 2024 7:41 pm
*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
The only thing TX did was allowed the mentally ill mother take their son to California.
Castrating 11 year old boy's is still illegal in Texas, as it should be everywhere.
Of course if it was, that would make you sad.
yea but texas knew what would happen
14 Apr 2024 7:47 pm
if she was going to poison him should texas let her take him?*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
The only thing TX did was allowed the mentally ill mother take their son to California.
Castrating 11 year old boy's is still illegal in Texas, as it should be everywhere.
Of course if it was, that would make you sad.
-------------------------You can’t get legislators in conservative states like Texas to protect kids,” Younger told Stew Peters.“You know, I went all the way up to the Supreme Court of Texas to stop my child from being moved to California under their transgender kidnapping laws, and all the justices except one voted against me and let my son move, saying that he was no more in danger of transgender child abuse in California than he was in Texas, where it was illegal.”“And sure enough, as soon as my ex-wife moved my sons there, she enrolled him with a physician [and] got him involved with a gender clinic,” Younger explained.
14 Apr 2024 7:50 pm
Show where I did so.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not the one advocating for the castration of an 11 year old boy.
That would be you... ya sick ****.
Don't get all pissy with me because you're a rube.
14 Apr 2024 7:51 pm
The mother is a pediatrician.
You?
14 Apr 2024 8:01 pm
then she should know that children under 18 cannot legally make their own decisions.
14 Apr 2024 8:03 pm
*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
The only thing TX did was allowed the mentally ill mother take their son to California.
Castrating 11 year old boy's is still illegal in Texas, as it should be everywhere.
Of course if it was, that would make you sad.
texas can also be sued by the boy when he is 18 for not protecting him.
14 Apr 2024 8:30 pm
Yes, Texas was in the wrong for allowing her to take the kid to California, especially after the father informed the TX court of the mother's intentions. I was merely pointing out that Rico was wrong by insinuating that TX law allowed for the 11 year old kid to be castrated as well, because it doesn't.jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ if she was going to poison him should texas let her take him?
-------------------------You can’t get legislators in conservative states like Texas to protect kids,” Younger told Stew Peters.“You know, I went all the way up to the Supreme Court of Texas to stop my child from being moved to California under their transgender kidnapping laws, and all the justices except one voted against me and let my son move, saying that he was no more in danger of transgender child abuse in California than he was in Texas, where it was illegal.”“And sure enough, as soon as my ex-wife moved my sons there, she enrolled him with a physician [and] got him involved with a gender clinic,” Younger explained.
The mother is clearly mentally ill, and the State of TX had every right to take the child into protective custody, but they chose not, probably to avoid a legal wrangle with California over it.
This would have been a perfect case to argue before the SCOTUS and get them to enact a Nation wide ban on gender reassignment surgery before the age of 18, but for some reason they passed on it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Apr 2024 8:32 pm
There are two threads currently on page one that are all the proof necessary. Even mainstain popped in on this thread and said he was against it... but you never have.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Show where I did so.
Don't get all pissy with me because you're a rube.
You've actually ridiculed my outrage while defending the law.
That can only mean that you're okay with it, ya sick ****.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Apr 2024 8:33 pm
The mother is a whack job that desperately wanted a daughter so she's gonna cut her son's nuts off to get one.
You agree with this sick ****.
You're opinion doesn't matter.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
14 Apr 2024 9:03 pm
the mother has mental problems and the child is influenced by his mother. when he turns 18 he could sue both texas and ca. for not acting in his best interest*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, Texas was in the wrong for allowing her to take the kid to California, especially after the father informed the TX court of the mother's intentions. I was merely pointing out that Rico was wrong by insinuating that TX law allowed for the 11 year old kid to be castrated as well, because it doesn't.
The mother is clearly mentally ill, and the State of TX had every right to take the child into protective custody, but they chose not, probably to avoid a legal wrangle with California over it.
This would have been a perfect case to argue before the SCOTUS and get them to enact a Nation wide ban on gender reassignment surgery before the age of 18, but for some reason they passed on it.
somthing for tx and ca to think about. if he does decide to sue they won't have a leg to stand on.
14 Apr 2024 9:05 pm
correction---- the state of texas had a duty to protect the child.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, Texas was in the wrong for allowing her to take the kid to California, especially after the father informed the TX court of the mother's intentions. I was merely pointing out that Rico was wrong by insinuating that TX law allowed for the 11 year old kid to be castrated as well, because it doesn't.
The mother is clearly mentally ill, and the State of TX had every right to take the child into protective custody, but they chose not, probably to avoid a legal wrangle with California over it.
This would have been a perfect case to argue before the SCOTUS and get them to enact a Nation wide ban on gender reassignment surgery before the age of 18, but for some reason they passed on it.
14 Apr 2024 10:27 pm
all these gender knife happy sanctuary states better start stock piling big bucks when all these minors come of age and start suing*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There are two threads currently on page one that are all the proof necessary. Even mainstain popped in on this thread and said he was against it... but you never have.
You've actually ridiculed my outrage while defending the law.
That can only mean that you're okay with it, ya sick ****.
14 Apr 2024 10:31 pm
15 Apr 2024 5:52 am
The mother is a pediatrician, the dad's a deadbeat riding his kid's issues to Lunatic Fringe fame.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The mother is a whack job that desperately wanted a daughter so she's gonna cut her son's nuts off to get one.
You agree with this sick ****.
You're opinion doesn't matter.
You're a latent pederast getting off on the possibilities.
15 Apr 2024 7:44 am
The mother being a pediatrician is irrelevant. Just because she has a college education doesn't mean she can't be psycho.R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑ The mother is a pediatrician, the dad's a deadbeat riding his kid's issues to Lunatic Fringe fame.
You're a latent pederast getting off on the possibilities.
Just look at you, for example.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
15 Apr 2024 7:55 am
"College degree"?*rippy38 » 15 Apr 2024, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ The mother being a pediatrician is irrelevant. Just because she has a college education doesn't mean she can't be psycho.
Just look at you, for example.
Google "pediatrician"
15 Apr 2024 7:57 am
So... doctors don't go to college?
Who knew?
Doesn't change the fact that it's irrelevant one bit.
Your diversion has been averted.
nod
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
15 Apr 2024 8:23 am
Google it first.*rippy38 » 15 Apr 2024, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ So... doctors don't go to college?
Who knew?
Doesn't change the fact that it's irrelevant one bit.
Your diversion has been averted.
nod
15 Apr 2024 8:32 am
Why should I.
It's irrelevant to the conversation.
She could be a brain surgeon or a housewife and I would still say she is a mentally ill psycho for wanting to castrate her 11 year old son... and you are too for agreeing with her.
Sick ****
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
15 Apr 2024 8:43 am
The kid should sue both states the day he turns 18.jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ the mother has mental problems and the child is influenced by his mother. when he turns 18 he could sue both texas and ca. for not acting in his best interest
somthing for tx and ca to think about. if he does decide to sue they won't have a leg to stand on.
Then go home and shoot his mother in the ****!
Who is online
In total there are 2728 users online :: 16 registered, 15 bots, and 2697 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, Lisa 558, nefarious101, springfield xd, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: SiteLockSpider, Moblie Safari, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Adsbot, ADmantX, proximic, Applebot, Googlebot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, GPTBot