Liberal Forum

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:12 am

And another lie. I see the blatant lies are out. Next comes blatant projections, then Mary. 

Let's do it.   

1. Blatant projection in 3...2...1....

**** your double standards..

If I assert it, it is so.
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:12 am

Grifty raped his wife.

Biden molested his daughter in the shower and raped three women. 

Ugggghhhh God. You are painfully boring. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:05 am

Please. Bush Jr came up with the Patriot Act. Ovomit expanded on it even more so. Do you hate them the same? 

Are you seeing the pattern yet? You are cherry picking this and that, finding something repulsive, that other presidents don't share, but they do share it. You can't. You hate Trump because the media told you to. Period. No other reasons.

he just may not get away with it, fine with me.............................

https://apnews.com/article/trump-classi ... 78b77d05ce


.FORT PIERCE, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday rejected one bid by Donald Trump to throw out out his classified documents criminal case, and appeared skeptical during hours of arguments of a separate effort to scuttle the prosecution ahead of trial.U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a two-page order saying that though the Trump team had raised “various arguments warranting serious consideration,” a dismissal of charges was not merited. The case involves boxes of records, some highly classified, that Trump took to his Mar-a-Lago estate when he left the White House.Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by the former president, had made clear during more than three-and-a-half hours of arguments that she was reluctant to dismiss one of the four criminal cases against the 2024 presumptive Republican presidential nominee. She said at one point that a dismissal of the indictment would be “difficult to see” and that it would be “quite an extraordinary” step to strike down an Espionage Act statute that underpins the bulk of the felony counts against Trump but that his lawyers contend is unconstitutionally vague.
 

jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:13 am

he just may not get away with it, fine with me..............................FORT PIERCE, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday rejected one bid by Donald Trump to throw out out his classified documents criminal case, and appeared skeptical during hours of arguments of a separate effort to scuttle the prosecution ahead of trial.U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a two-page order saying that though the Trump team had raised “various arguments warranting serious consideration,” a dismissal of charges was not merited. The case involves boxes of records, some highly classified, that Trump took to his Mar-a-Lago estate when he left the White House.Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by the former president, had made clear during more than three-and-a-half hours of arguments that she was reluctant to dismiss one of the four criminal cases against the 2024 presumptive Republican presidential nominee. She said at one point that a dismissal of the indictment would be “difficult to see” and that it would be “quite an extraordinary” step to strike down an Espionage Act statute that underpins the bulk of the felony counts against Trump but that his lawyers contend is unconstitutionally vague.

More cherry picking. Do you want me to counter it and cherry pick also with Biden and Ovomit? 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:13 am

**** your double standards..

If I assert it, it is so.

And there it is, the projection. Just as I predicted. 

             Hello Mary. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am

And there it is, the projection. Just as I predicted. 

             Hello Mary.

No projection.

One standard, narcissist.
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:16 am

No projection.

One standard, narcissist.

Projection. You bring up Trump raping his wife while ignoring Biden molesting his daughter and Clinton raping 3 women. 

You are so **** predictable. Why are you so predictable? It's embarrassing. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am

More cherry picking. Do you want me to counter it and cherry pick also with Biden and Ovomit?

oooooooooh  please how is that cherry picking?

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am

More cherry picking. Do you want me to counter it and cherry pick also with Biden and Ovomit?

yes show how any they claimed every single document is their PERSONAL property?

jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:21 am

yes show how any they claimed every single document is their PERSONAL property?

This is getting boring Jerra. The point is you are cherry picking vile behaviors, to which I could do the same. It doesn't make a case as to why you choose to hate Trump for his vile behavior but not the others for their vile behavior. 

I don't know how else to say that. 

jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:19 am

oooooooooh  please how is that cherry picking?

Ummmmm....the fact that picked that one incident. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:18 am

Projection. You bring up Trump raping his wife while ignoring Biden molesting his daughter and Clinton raping 3 women. 

You are so **** predictable. Why are you so predictable? It's embarrassing.

I gainsay your assertions with assertions.

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:26 am

I gainsay your assertions with assertions.

I am not the one that hates Trump, so I have no assertions. You are the one with the double standards. 

Ask me why

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:27 am

I am not the one that hates Trump, so I have no assertions. You are the one with the double standards. 

Ask me why

That's ****.

 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:28 am

That's ****.

Veghead's idea of intelligent thoughts. Level 0. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:28 am

Veghead's idea of intelligent thoughts. Level 0.

In response to your assertions, all I need do is assert.

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:33 am

In response to your assertions, all I need do is assert.

What assertions? I made one. You made plenty of **** though. 


What is survivorship bias? In your words, **** your copy/paste. 

Look at this ****, this is twice I asked and he keeps running...run....run...run....

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:24 am

This is getting boring Jerra. The point is you are cherry picking vile behaviors, to which I could do the same. It doesn't make a case as to why you choose to hate Trump for his vile behavior but not the others for their vile behavior. 

I don't know how else to say that.

of course. it does not fit with your double standards.

trump can do no wrong in your eyes and anyone who proves differently pisses you off.
 
 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 11:24 am

Ummmmm....the fact that picked that one incident.

you mean the one you can't refute? and say trump is being unfairly persecuted?

jerrab » 14 Apr 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 12:01 pm

you mean the one you can't refute? and say trump is being unfairly persecuted?

I am not trying to refute it. I am trying to get you to give me reasons why you hate Trump that can't be traced back to a double standard.