The source has been posted and ignored by you... on this thread and another... so TWICE now.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ So what?
Slack jawed morons are in surplus.
Has no bearing on the facts.
But, just to confirm....This doesn't involve the kid's genitals, does it....
It's ****.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The source has been posted and ignored by you... on this thread and another... so TWICE now.
And yes, it does say "physical mutilation"... just so ya know.
If it isn't in agreement with the laws of NY...you know, the things he must adhere to in performance of his JOB...it is opinion. If "spin" is in agreement with the law, it isn't spin...it's an attempt to counteract spin.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Day 2 of The Whine.
I told you....
The words of the PRESIDING JUDGE are clear and they are in direct response to the efforts of Grifty's attorneys to spin it your way.
It isn't his "opinion", it is a pointed rejoinder to Team Grifty's misrepresentations.
But it IS.ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ If it isn't in agreement with the laws of NY...you know, the things he must adhere to in performance of his JOB...it is opinion. If "spin" is in agreement with the law, it isn't spin...it's an attempt to counteract spin.
So... you DID read the story at the provided link... which means I DID answer your "question"... and you were BLATANTLY LYING when you said I hadn't posted it.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ It's ****.
It's about "puberty blockers"...
You're gonna need to purge your spank bank.
Did I mention that mom's a PEDIATRICIAN?
Nope... "The law will apply to sexual assaults committed on or after Sept. 1."
How do we know you're lying?*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ So... you did read the story at the provided link... which means I DID answer your "question"... and you were BLATANTLY LYING when you said I hadn't posted it.
And yes, physical castration of the 11 year old boy is in the table, as stated in the article you were claiming to not have seen or read.
You are a lying hack sir... and YOU just proved/admitted it to the board.
Check and Mate.
Enjoy another lonely night in your condo with your computer and that bottle of Jergen's lotion you **** loser.
It's a beautiful afternoon/evening here and I'm about to fire up the grill and make a margarita.
Toodles
You are free to cling to your faith.ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope... "The law will apply to sexual assaults committed on or after Sept. 1."
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles ... al-contact
Because of the US Constitution, unless there is another incident, Trump is not now, nor will he ever be, guilty of rape.
Remember, that is according to whiny *** liberal opinion and does not have any basis in NY law at the time. We have been instructed to deny fact and keep repeating the partisan lie.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You are free to cling to your faith.
Grifty is a rapist.
Whine on.
The only one whining about the fact labored by the presiding judge is you.ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember, that is according to whiny *** liberal opinion and does not have any basis in NY law at the time. We have been instructed to deny fact and keep repeating the partisan lie.
Correcting your (and his) spin is not whining. It is merely correctly stating legal fact.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ The only one whining about the fact labored by the presiding judge is you.
ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Correcting your (and his) spin is not whining. It is merely correctly stating legal fact.
speaks for itself.your (and his) spin
Who is "we"? The other voices in your head? It has to be, because no one else here is agreeing with your sick and twisted position on this.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ How do we know you're lying?
You won't quote from your source...but you will melt down.
Did I mention that the dad lost shared custody in TEXAS for being a deadbeat?
*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Who is "we"? The other voices in your head? It has to be, because no one else here is agreeing with your sick and twisted position on this.
The fact still remains that you defended the mom's "right" to mutilate her 11 year old son's genitals... or the fact that you were flat out lying about me not providing the source to the story... even though you made eight posts on the thread that the story ( with link) was originally posted in yesterday.
You are just a sick lying piece of ****, and a fraud... but of course I already knew that, as did most people here. Getting you to admit to it yourself is just icing on the cake.
I bet you even flunked out of Brown and have spent your entire adult life living on family money. You seem like the type.
No strike through?