Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 4:58 pm

And the judge clarified, for the impenetrably stupid, what the jury decision meant.

You're just trying to divert from the fact that I exposed your moral bankruptcy by you favoring the State sanctioned mutilation of an 11 year old boy's genitals yesterday.

The fact still remains as well that the jury never said rape... so you're losing on both fronts.


   

 
 

*rippy38 » 13 Apr 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:13 pm

You're just trying to divert from the fact that I exposed your moral bankruptcy by you favoring the State sanctioned mutilation of an 11 year old boy's genitals yesterday.

The fact still remains as well that the jury never said rape... so you're losing on both fronts.


 

Can't divert by quoting the presiding judge, Country.

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:18 pm

Can't divert by quoting the presiding judge, Country.

You were certainly trying...
 

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm

Prove it.

The fact that you can't prove that I don't habitually answer questions from other members the first time proves it. 

You evading that proves it. 

QED. 

*rippy38 » 13 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm

****...

Seriously. I don't know how to say "yes" in any simpler terms. It's one syllable, 3 letters. It can't get any simpler. Yet, he still can't figure it out. 

Vegas » 13 Apr 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:36 pm

Seriously. I don't know how to say "yes" in any simpler terms. It's one syllable, 3 letters. It can't get any simpler. Yet, he still can't figure it out.

He never fails to entertain, that's for sure.

LOL
 

DeezerShoove » 13 Apr 2024, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 4:54 pm

I'm still waiting for even ONE example of you answering a question directly.


 

         And he thinks that I am the only one that calls him out on his cowardice. 

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 4:57 pm

You said 20..

I asked "What's in it for me?"

You.....get this....failed to answer.

So what? Alright I'll "compromise" and reduce the request to 5%.

Show a SINGLE example.

The stakes are as you said. Re-read the thread, ya **** dope.
I mean, I barely pay attention to you and even I remember, ****.

So go ahead and see if you got that 5%. It will be a first.   

*rippy38 » 13 Apr 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:20 pm

You were certainly trying...

It's impossible, Vegas...

DeezerShoove » 13 Apr 2024, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 7:44 pm

So what? Alright I'll "compromise" and reduce the request to 5%.

Show a SINGLE example.

The stakes are as you said. Re-read the thread, ya **** dope.
I mean, I barely pay attention to you and even I remember, ****.

So go ahead and see if you got that 5%. It will be a first. 

Crack ho,

Since you can't figure it out, why don't you just post the rule and your stipulation.

We can see if it applies to you, to determine the validity of your whine.


 

Vegas » 13 Apr 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:44 pm

         And he thinks that I am the only one that calls him out on his cowardice.

Where's that example of survivorship bias?

*rippy38 » 13 Apr 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:13 pm

You're just trying to divert from the fact that I exposed your moral bankruptcy by you favoring the State sanctioned mutilation of an 11 year old boy's genitals yesterday.

The fact still remains as well that the jury never said rape... so you're losing on both fronts.


 

the State sanctioned

are you talking about a legal RIGHT established by 2 state courts?

 

Vegas » 13 Apr 2024, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 5:34 pm

The fact that you can't prove that I don't habitually answer questions from other members the first time proves it. 

You evading that proves it. 

QED.

The fact that you haven't posted an example of Survivorship bias or anything resembling thought, and CONSISTENTLY fail to reach Level 1, proves that you're a moron.

 

The Oligarchs CRAVE cheap labor.

Its simple ....................CAPITALISM.

Biden Regime is not ComNist....they are 100% NeoLiberal Capitalists. Wake the **** up.

Both sides ....are slapping their neocon cocks.... AROUND THE REAL ISSUE.

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 8:38 pm

The fact that you haven't posted an example of Survivorship bias 

Rule,idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 

Now coward! 

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 8:29 pm

Where's that example of survivorship bias?

Rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 8:32 pm

are you talking about a legal RIGHT established by 2 state courts?

There is no RIGHT to mutilating an 11 year old boy's genitals you sick ****.
 

R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2024, 8:29 pm

Crack ho,

Since you can't figure it out, why don't you just post the rule and your stipulation.

We can see if it applies to you, to determine the validity of your whine.

Your infantile troll rule is only needed for . . . 
infantile trolls.

If you can't find a single time you answered a post directly,
how could you expect me to find one? They're your posts after all.

So far all you have proven is you're a **** troll. Always have been. I win.

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 6:22 am

There is no RIGHT to mutilating an 11 year old boy's genitals you sick ****.

   I'm sorry your mom did that to you.
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 6:22 am

There is no RIGHT to mutilating an 11 year old boy's genitals you sick ****.

What did the courts of California and Texas say about that?