Texas allowed the mother to take the child to California, and California is the one allowing the procedure.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ What did the courts of California and Texas say about that?
Flash!*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ Texas allowed the mother to take the child to California, and California is the one allowing the procedure.
This kind of **** is still illegal in Texas... and your still a sick **** for supporting it, regardless of the twisted progressive law.
Wear your badge proudly pedo.
Flash!R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Flash!
It is "Rule of Law" not ""Rule of Rippie's Feefees."
Of the two of us, you are statistically far more likely to be caught with a stash of kiddie porn.*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Flash!
YOU support mutilating 11 year old boy's genitals.
I wonder what else you fantasize about doing to little boys?
Sick ****.
You are a single man that spends all of his free time in internet chat rooms and has a Planet Fitness membership.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ Of the two of us, you are statistically far more likely to be caught with a stash of kiddie porn.
It's always the chest thumping crusaders.

One of us is indulging a fantasy of "genital mutilation".*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ You are a single man that spends all of his free time in internet chat rooms and has a Planet Fitness membership.
I would say you are a far more qualified fit in the pedo/groomer category that anyone else... not to mention that you have VOCALLY supported mutilating the genitals of little boys.
Sick ****
I didn't get the Planet Fitness reference...*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ You are a single man that spends all of his free time in internet chat rooms and has a Planet Fitness membership.
I would say you are a far more qualified fit in the pedo/groomer category that anyone else... not to mention that you have VOCALLY supported mutilating the genitals of little boys.
Sick ****
You have just let everyone on the forum know that you are okay with mutilating an 11 year old boys genitals is all.R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ One of us is indulging a fantasy of "genital mutilation".
And it's not me.
What "genital mutilation"?*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ You have just let everyone on the forum know that you are okay with mutilating an 11 year old boys genitals is all.
Nobody else here has done that... not even your buddy the mainstain.
Sick ****.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=87068R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ What "genital mutilation"?
It is how the source you're too ashamed to name sold this bag of **** to you.
Answer the question, pervert.
**** cretin.Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Veghead demanding answers to his questions while evading questions from others. As always.
Have you answered any today?
Oh wait...that was a question...never mind.
1. "Does the rule apply to you?" To which you still don't know what "yes" means.
I did dumb ***, and provided proof that you support mutilating 11 year old boy's genitals.
Even when you answer them he just acts like you didn't and demands again.Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Veghead demanding answers to his questions while evading questions from others. As always.
Have you answered any today?
Oh wait...that was a question...never mind.
1. "Does the rule apply to you?" To which you still don't know what "yes" means.
There's no "genital mutilation"....it is your fantasy...*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ I did dumb ***, and provided proof that you support mutilating 11 year old boy's genitals.
Sick ****
Then why didn't the jury find him guilty of rape? They found him guilty of sexual assault instead. I wonder of the laws of NY had anything to do with the verdict?R.Suave » 13 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
I'll be sure to qualify it should I find myself traveling through NY state prior to 2023...ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Then why didn't the jury find him guilty of rape? They found him guilty of sexual assault instead. I wonder of the laws of NY had anything to do with the verdict?
R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ I'll be sure to qualify it should I find myself traveling through NY state prior to 2023...
Now please stop whining, peasant.
The APSA survey "looked like" an example of Survivorship bias to you.