Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:54 pm

Is there any talk of mutilating this kid's genitals?

See the reply you just replied to

Yes, there is... but you won't open the link in the OP on the thread I provided for you because you are a disingenuous piece of **** that cant admit when they are wrong, ever.

Just the facts ma'am.
 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm

Veghead's idea of intelligent thoughts. Level 0

Do you wont me to show evidence that you lie? 

Ask me why

No, I want you to name the women Clinton "raped".


 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm

Breitbart....

And you yap about Vanity Fair....

Hoft actually IS a homosexual.

Did Paula claim to have been raped?

Asked and answered.

You can never say that.
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:57 pm

See the reply you just replied to

Yes, there is... but you won't open the link in the OP on the thread I provided for you because you are a disingenuous piece of **** that cant admit when they are wrong, ever.

Just the facts ma'am.

I did, and read every word, you freak.

Now show me where it tells you anything of the sort.
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm

Asked and answered.

You can never say that.

I don't see an answer.

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:57 pm

No, I want you to name the women Clinton "raped".

Google is your friend. 


And I will never care about your wants/needs...nobody will.

ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm

They were his OPINION and, as he admitted, do NOT conform with NY law at the time of the incident or today.  But I understand you don't have the mental or emotional strength to accept fact.

“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

now shut the **** up, tedious peasant.

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm

Google is your friend. 

And I will never care about your wants/needs...nobody will.

Are these your words?

What is survivorship bias? Your words, not Googles. 

You're the dumbest piece of **** alive.

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm

I don't see an answer.

You never do... especially the ones that make you look like an idiot, which is most of them.
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:09 pm

You never do... especially the ones that make you look like an idiot, which is most of them.

Why not just repost it?

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm

Are these your words?

You're the dumbest piece of **** alive.

Ummmm....yes, and? 


Oh God. You always do this after I crush you. You repost random quotes then pretend that you said something. You do this to @rippy 38  and others also. 

No creativity. Always the same redundant pattern. 

Vegas » 14 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm

Ummmm....yes, and? 

Oh God. You always do this after I crush you. You repost random quotes then pretend that you said something. You do this to @rippy 38  and others also. 

No creativity. Always the same redundant pattern.

You actually need it explained to you.

You're a **** moron.

Name these 3 women, Level 0
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:10 pm

Why not just repost it?

Because you will just ignore it (again) and ask me to post it (again)... and then lie and say it was never provided.

That's your schtick... for some reason.

I can't tell if it's the weed or that you are simply that disingenuous. Probably a little bit of both, along with the narcissism.

Your pal mainstain does the same damn thing, and NFC to a point. It's like a thing with you progressive hacks.

​​​​​​I think it's just who y'all are.

That's what this thread is about.
 
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm

“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

now shut the **** up, tedious peasant.

Why not post the entire comment?  You know, the part where he acknowledges she failed to prove rape.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.” Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.” 

He is entitled to his OPINION related to the case, however NY law...even today...does not define what "happened" as rape.  Since you lack the ability to accept legal fact, there is no need to discuss if further.  Any future statements by liberals here claiming Trump is a rapist will be greeted with "Remember, that is according to whiny *** liberal opinion and does not have any basis in NY law at the time.  We have been instructed to deny fact and keep repeating the partisan lie."
 
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:12 pm

Name these 3 women, Level 0

Google is your friend. 

 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:15 pm

Because you will just ignore it (again) and ask me to post it (again)... and then lie and say it was never provided.

That's your schtick... for some reason.

I can't tell if it's the weed or that you are simply that disingenuous. Probably a little bit of both, along with the narcissism.

Your pal mainstain does the same damn thing, and NFC to a point. It's like a thing with you progressive hacks.

​​​​​​I think it's just who y'all are.

That's what this thread is about.

There's a far simpler reason.

You're lying.

You never answered.

Because you don't want to admit that I was spot on.

You should - it gets worse for your narrativy thing.
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:19 pm

There's a far simpler reason.

You're lying.

You never answered.

Because you don't want to admit that I was spot on.

You should - it gets worse for your narrativy thing.

Funny how there are far more people on this forum that agree with my assessment than of yours...

I would go so far as to say all of them do... with the exception of your Mongoose buddy and that BCF idiot.

Think what you want if it makes you feel better. I know you are incapable of accepting any other conclusion than that you are 100% correct, and everyone else is wrong.

It's just a personality fault on your part that you can't change.

Carry on...
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm

Funny how there are far more people on this forum that agree with my assessment than of yours...

I would go so far as to say all of them do... with the exception of your Mongoose buddy and that BCF idiot.

Think what you want if it makes you feel better. I know you are incapable of accepting any other conclusion than that you are 100% correct, and everyone else is wrong.

It's just a personality fault on your part that you can't change.

Carry on...

Exactly. Good assessment. He is a genuine narcissist. They are predictable and lie incessantly. They can't help it. It's just who they are. Their control issues get the best of them. That is the reason why he asks incessant questions day after day, post after post, but rarely, if ever at all, will answer anyone. The person who asks questions are the ones in control, he needs that control. He doesn't answer any because he would have to give up some of that control. 

These people really are sick. The only logical thing to do is to make fun of them through any dehumanizing means possible.

ConsRule » 14 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm

Why not post the entire comment?  You know, the part where he acknowledges she failed to prove rape.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.” Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.” 

He is entitled to his OPINION related to the case, however NY law...even today...does not define what "happened" as rape.  Since you lack the ability to accept legal fact, there is no need to discuss if further.  Any future statements by liberals here claiming Trump is a rapist will be greeted with "Remember, that is according to whiny *** liberal opinion and does not have any basis in NY law at the time.  We have been instructed to deny fact and keep repeating the partisan lie."

Day 2 of The Whine.

I told you....

The words of the PRESIDING JUDGE are clear and they are in direct response to the efforts of Grifty's attorneys to spin it your way.

It isn't his "opinion", it is a pointed rejoinder to Team Grifty's misrepresentations.
 

*rippy38 » 14 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm

Funny how there are far more people on this forum that agree with my assessment than of yours...

I would go so far as to say all of them do... with the exception of your Mongoose buddy and that BCF idiot.

Think what you want if it makes you feel better. I know you are incapable of accepting any other conclusion than that you are 100% correct, and everyone else is wrong.

It's just a personality fault on your part that you can't change.

Carry on...

So what?

Slack jawed morons are in surplus.

Has no bearing on the facts.

But, just to confirm....This doesn't involve the kid's genitals, does it....