Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 9:19 am

You voted for war, ineptly prosecuted at enormous expense, and deficits...

Expense and deficits..?

Yep..

Ukraine anyone?
Israel aid?


 

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 9:39 am

Expense and deficits..?

Yep..

Ukraine anyone?
Israel aid?

wanna go over the numbers, Hole?

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 9:39 am

So..
You were against removing Saddam because of the WMDS threat and would have done nothing about bin Laden?

That's what you're saying?

You were against removing Saddam because of the WMDS threat

There was no such threat.

You are too stupid to vote.

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:00 am

wanna go over the numbers, Hole?

Sure..
There's plenty of blame to go around...

Remember this classic?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZCzUecCT3M
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNoCaidKKiE

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am

There was no such threat.

You are too stupid to vote.

There was no WMD threat?


Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am

There was no such threat.

You are too stupid to vote.

There was no WMD threat?



"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:33 am

There was no WMD threat?

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Hole,


I know the FOX script....it's ****.

I also know what Scrub ordered Rummy to do.

FOX has never told you.

 

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:30 am

Sure..
There's plenty of blame to go around...

Remember this classic?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZCzUecCT3M

NUMBERS, Hole....

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:35 am

Hole,

I know the FOX script....it's ****.

I also know what Scrub ordered Rummy to do.

FOX has never told you.

This has nothing to do with Fox

It has to do with what DEMOCRATS said about WMDS..


"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

 

I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
 

Hey Suave..

Taking a beating today huh?

There was no threat from WMDS..??

Why did so many Democrats lie then?


"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. He is a threat. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:36 am

This has nothing to do with Fox

It has to do with what DEMOCRATS said about WMDS..

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

****, Hole.

You're a rube.

Clinton had nothing to do with Scrub's decision to invade Iraqnam.
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:47 am

****, Hole.

You're a rube.

Clinton had nothing to do with Scrub's decision to invade Iraqnam.

Well actually...

His wife voted for the war and he told everyone they had WMDS..

Remember?

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:49 am

Well actually...

His wife voted for the war and he told everyone they had WMDS..

Remember?

No, she didn't.

Post the name of the act for which she voted.

So...
Bill says there's WMDS...
His wife says there's WMDS...

And she voted for the war..

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Kinda hard to spin that one Suave...

 
 

R.Suave » 14 Apr 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:47 am

****, Hole.

You're a rube.

Clinton had nothing to do with Scrub's decision to invade Iraqnam.

His wife voted for the war Harvard....

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:56 am

His wife voted for the war Harvard....

No she didn't, Hole.

BooRadley » 14 Apr 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2024, 10:50 am

So...
Bill says there's WMDS...
His wife says there's WMDS...

And she voted for the war..

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Post the name of the act for which she voted.