Liberal Forum

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm

He really is a coward.   

He knows he is, all narcissists know that they are cowards.

Post your example of Survivorship bias..

Without any extraneous commentary.
 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:39 pm

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

Already posted.

Fake.
 
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm

Already posted.

Fake.

**** your wrong definition. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm

He really is a coward.   

He knows he is, all narcissists know that they are cowards.

He makes a comment, and in the very next post he's going in the complete opposite direction and is trying to say that you're "diverting" from the topic.

Our back and forth on this thread started with me asking him his position on abortion (see the OP) and he has YET to even say the word abortion yet... but everyone else is "diverting" from the topic.

This guy is something else.

 
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm

I accept your concession... again.

LOL

Yes, I concede that you have issues with context, recall, and integrity.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:39 pm

Post your example of Survivorship bias..

Without any extraneous commentary.

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy. Rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 


What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm

He makes a comment, and in the very next post he's going in the complete opposite direction and is trying to say that you're "diverting" from the topic.

Our back and forth on this thread started with me asking him his position on abortion (see the OP) and he has YET to even say the word abortion yet... but everyone else is "diverting" from the topic.

This guy is something else.

And you could have had it.....all you had to do was acknowledge that the OP is premised on a lie, as demonstrated.

But you gagged.

You do that a lot....
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm

He makes a comment, and in the very next post he's going in the complete opposite direction and is trying to say that you're "diverting" from the topic.

Our back and forth on this thread started with me asking him his position on abortion (see the OP) and he has YET to even say the word abortion yet... but everyone else is "diverting" from the topic.

This guy is something else.

It's how narcissism works. They can't tolerate being cornered and they sure as hell can't admit that they don't know something, so they pull these cowardly tactics.

He needs to commit suicide. 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy. Rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 


What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

 

I prove that I have already done so, and you leave the forum for 3 months.

Deal?

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm

He makes a comment, and in the very next post he's going in the complete opposite direction and is trying to say that you're "diverting" from the topic.

Our back and forth on this thread started with me asking him his position on abortion (see the OP) and he has YET to even say the word abortion yet... but everyone else is "diverting" from the topic.

This guy is something else.

In the retelling, nothing gets past you.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm

Yes, I concede that you have issues with context, recall, and integrity.

Integrity?

You're the one that posted a bald faced lie first thing this morning about something you claimed I said... not me.

You hear what YOU want to hear, and what's even more disturbing is, you actually believe it yourself!

How about one of your "retellings" now?

LOL


 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm

Integrity?

You're the one that posted a bald faced lie first thing this morning about something you claimed I said... not me.

You hear what YOU want to hear, and what's even more disturbing is, you actually believe it yourself!

How about one of your "retellings" now?

LOL

Yes...Integrity.

You lied about your own words.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm

I prove that I have already done so, and you leave the forum for 3 months.

Deal?

The correct definition in your own words? Deal.

If you can't then you are banned for 3 months. 

Do it...NOW!

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm

**** your wrong definition. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

Prove it's wrong.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm

Yes...Integrity.

You lied about your own words.

You lie about everyone else words... intentionally.

What did I get wrong that was so horrible?

Post it. 

And don't say "rule" because I don't follow that ****.


 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:47 pm

Prove it's wrong.

So no deal? Yeah, I thought that you were bluffing. You always do. 

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm

Yes...Integrity.

You lied about your own words.

You should never bring up integrity.  You told me, IN THIS THREAD, you would trade positions with me (the positions requested in the OP) but only if I posted mine first.  I posted mine...from you, crickets.

You are nothing more than a lying coward...more commonly referred to as a liberal.
 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:47 pm

The correct definition in your own words? Deal.

If you can't then you are banned for 3 months. 

Do it...NOW!

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.


Prove it's wrong.

Now.


**** putz.

ConsRule » 16 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm

You should never bring up integrity.  You told me, IN THIS THREAD, you would trade positions with me (the positions requested in the OP) but only if I posted mine first.  I posted mine...from you, crickets.

You are nothing more than a lying coward...more commonly referred to as a liberal.

Post my words.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

Prove it's wrong.

Now.

**** putz.

Nope. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

​​​​​​​1. Turn it on me