Liberal Forum

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm

So no deal? Yeah, I thought that you were bluffing. You always do. 

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

No...

Deal.

Delivered.

Put up or take off.
 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm

So no deal? Yeah, I thought that you were bluffing. You always do. 

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

At this point he's had more than ample time to study the concept of survivor bias up one side and down the other so... asking for a definition at this point is moot.

Unless of course he STILL doesn't understand what it is, which is highly possible.

 
 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm

Nope. 

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

My words.

Correct.

​​​​​​​Take off.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm

Post my words.

If you insist.

R. Suave

ConsRule » Today, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 12:17 pm
I blame you as well.

It's not vexing...I'm just curious about your position.  Especially since you so rarely go "on the record" on any topic.

To what end?

You lie about everything.

If my positions are ambiguous, why are you & the Usual Suspects so bitter?

I'll trade you.

But your credit sucks so you must pay in advance.

____________________

Now, are you a person of integrity or a lying coward?
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm

At this point he's had more than ample time to study the concept of survivor bias up one side and down the other so... asking for a definition at this point is moot.

Unless of course he STILL doesn't understand what it is, which is highly possible.

the concept of survivor bias up one side and down the other so...

It's Survivorship bias.

You're as **** stupid as he is.

asking for a definition at this point is moot.

 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm

My words.

Correct.

Take off.

Your words

Incorrect

Coward

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

​​​​​​​1. Turn it on me

ConsRule » 16 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm

If you insist.

R. Suave


To what end?

You lie about everything.

If my positions are ambiguous, why are you & the Usual Suspects so bitter?

I'll trade you.

But your credit sucks so you must pay in advance.

____________________

Now, are you a person of integrity or a lying coward?
 

 

Where do you see me specifying what I wanted from you?

Vegas » 16 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm

Your words

Incorrect

Coward

What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. Turn it on me

Prove they are incorrect.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm

At this point he's had more than ample time to study the concept of survivor bias up one side and down the other so... asking for a definition at this point is moot.

Unless of course he STILL doesn't understand what it is, which is highly possible.

He doesn't understand. He has had 2.5 years to study it. His ego won't allow him to admit that he doesn't know. 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:55 pm

Prove they are incorrect.

Turns it on me. 100% accuracy.

Rule idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 



What is survivorship bias, your words only. And **** your incorrect definition. 

​​​​​​​1. Turn it on me

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm

He makes a comment, and in the very next post he's going in the complete opposite direction and is trying to say that you're "diverting" from the topic.

Our back and forth on this thread started with me asking him his position on abortion (see the OP) and he has YET to even say the word abortion yet... but everyone else is "diverting" from the topic.

This guy is something else.

I’m not diverting at what week do you think abortions should not be performed?  Healthy mother and fetus

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm

No...


 

Yes...

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm

Where do you see me specifying what I wanted from you?

 

No more answers until you post your positions.

But it appears you answered one question...you're a lying coward.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm

It's Survivorship bias.

You're as **** stupid as he is.

It's refered to as either.

You would know this with just a few mouse clicks.

I defined it AND gave an example last night, and all I've seen you do so far is piss yourself over it.

You still don't understand the concept... do ya?

It sure doesn't sound like it.

 
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm

You lie about everyone else words... intentionally.

What did I get wrong that was so horrible?

Post it. 

And don't say "rule" because I don't follow that ****.

I quoted you verbatim.

You quoted yoursef falsely, conveying an entirely different meaning. Because you have no integrity.

And don't say "rule" because I don't follow that ****.

The **** you don't....

 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:57 pm

It's refered to as either.

You would know this with just a few mouse clicks.

I defined it AND gave an example last night, and all I've seen you do so far is piss yourself over it.

You still don't understand the concept... do ya?

It sure doesn't sound like it.

You gave an example...and your definition demonstrated a very limited understanding of the concept.

 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm

I quoted you verbatim.

You quoted yoursef falsely, conveying an entirely different meaning. Because you have no integrity.

The **** you don't....

Just stating it without providing an example (like I did this morning when you lied) doesn't hold water Rico.

They should have covered that in your political science class at Brown.

What self imposed "rules" do I adhere to on this forum?

None... because you're just pulling that out of your *** too.

You really suck at this.

 
 
 
 

ConsRule » 16 Apr 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:57 pm

No more answers until you post your positions.

But it appears you answered one question...you're a lying coward.

That's ok...we both know the answer.

You presumed to throw something at me and then demand satisfaction.

Then you had the bbs to impugn my integrity.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:59 pm

You gave an example...and your definition demonstrated a very limited understanding of the concept.

LOL

Shall I go find "my words" for you?

Hang on just a second...
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 3:01 pm

That's ok...we both know the answer.

You presumed to throw something at me and then demand satisfaction.

Then you had the bbs to impugn my integrity.

You're a lying coward...you have no integrity, so it is impossible to impugn it.