Liberal Forum

Would someone please sweep up the detritus...

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:09 pm

That was the original reference definition, pillock.

"Plagiarist", Erasmus.

That was a copy and paste... not your words... and not the first definition you provided last night.


 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm

Would someone please sweep up the detritus...

LOL

I guess you did catch me misspelling a word. Ill give you that one.

It's the little things I suppose.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:17 pm

LOL

I guess you did catch me misspelling a word. Ill give you that one.

It's the little things I suppose.

"little"

lol
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 3:05 pm

Make this the last time, wooly headed codger

viewtopic.php?p=2532189#p2532189

We've already cleared this up.

I conceded that I did say "close but not quite there" instead of " close but no cigar".

Hardly an impeachable offense, but if you want to take it as a win, then by all means do.

You need something to be be proud of after the drubbing you've received today.

LOL
 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:18 pm

"little"

lol

You must be missing me over on the USMB.

LOL
 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:10 pm

Plagiarist.  

Spelling cop
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:21 pm

You must be missing me over on the USMB.

LOL

What happened over there?    
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:21 pm

Spelling cop

hs grad

 
 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:26 pm

What happened over there?  

I heard they were getting inundated with advertisements and it was making the board glitchy.

It seems it may be under new ownership from what I've heard.

I haven't been over there much in the last couple of weeks so I don't know for sure, but that seems to be the scuttlebutt.

LOL
 
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm

I heard they were getting inundated with advertisements and it was making the board glitchy.

It seems it may be under new ownership from what I've heard.

I haven't been over there much in the last couple of weeks so I don't know for sure, but that seems to be the scuttlebutt.

LOL

You haven't been there because I took over.      
 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:31 pm

You haven't been there because I took over.    

LOL

Alrighty then...
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:33 pm

LOL

Alrighty then...

Then your thread got locked!    

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:34 pm

Then your thread got locked!  

They do that with all the introduction threads that run long and go off topic.

They did that with the first introduction thread I made there too after it had been up for a couple of weeks and had nothing to do with an "introduction" anymore.

Duh.

I'm really surprised it stayed open as long as it did.

LOL

 
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:38 pm

They do that with all the introduction threads that run long and go off topic.

They did that with the first one I made there too after it had been up for a couple of weeks and had nothing to do with an "introduction" anymore.

Duh.

LOL

Uh, no.  Almost all the intro threads are unlocked.  Most all are off track, as is the standard. 

Guess all your mod "friends" got tired of your gay whining.  Every little butt kisser like you eventually gets loathed and discarded!      
 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:41 pm

Uh, no.  Almost all the intro threads are unlocked.  Most all are off track, as is the standard. 

Guess all your mod "friends" got tired of your gay whining.  Every little butt kisser like you eventually gets loathed and discarded!    

It was 11 pages long... and most of it had nothing to do with an "introduction" in the first place. I didn't even know it was locked until you just told me so... it seems that you are way more worried about it than I am. LOL

I'm still an active member in good standing over there... I just haven't posted there in a couple of weeks.

What's your sok count up to over there now?

50?

60?

Does any body even care... or better than that, do they even notice?

 

 
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:46 pm

It was 11 pages long... and most of it had nothing to do with an "introduction" in the first place. I didn't even know it was locked until you just told me so... it seems that you are way more worried about it than I am. LOL

I'm still an active member in good standing over there... I just haven't posted there in a couple of weeks.

What's your sok count up to over there now?

50?

60?

The very thing you tried in vain to stop.  What were your words?  Oh, I remember.  You "read all the rules twice" and the "mods don't take any prisoners."  

You're too dumb to figure out why trying to stop people never works out for you.    





 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:16 pm

That was a copy and paste... not your words... and not the first definition you provided last night.

****,

The point of posting it was to remind you of the language used.

Now stop being such a bitter ****** and ask @Vegas  to post his definition.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:46 pm

Does any body even care... or better than that, do they even notice?

You do.  You "read the rules twice" and claimed you'd stop me because the mods there "don't take any prisoners."

 

Independence » 16 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm

You do.  You "read the rules twice" and claimed you'd stop me because the mods there "don't take any prisoners."

I never made any such claim.

All I did was let the mods know who you are and what you're about. That's all. Same as I did here.

Lol