Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
R. Suave, here is your chance to discuss the abortion issue.
R. Suave, here is your chance to discuss the abortion issue.
By Huey
16 Apr 2024 7:10 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
16 Apr 2024 5:00 pm
Yeah, and as I pointed out... the C&P you posted was a far better explanation than your original garbage definition that you came up with on your own.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ ****,
The point of posting it was to remind you of the language used.
Now stop being such a bitter ****** and ask @Vegas to post his definition.
Next time cite your source... it's only fair to person that actually penned it.
Schmuck
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 5:06 pm
Ya, right. You never aimed to get rid of me!*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I never made any such claim.
All I did was let the mods know who you are and what you're about. That's all. Same as I did here.
Lol
16 Apr 2024 5:15 pm
The way I see it is, the only way soks are a problem is if they are used to spam the board, and if you spam over there or here, they will pooch kick the account out the window so... your efforts will be for naught anyway.
All the time and energy you expend making all those sok accounts is for nothing at the end of the day so, go for it. The only reason you were a pain in the *** on .org is because kfools wouldn't alter the up/downvote system to prevent you from spamming everybody's inboxes with notifications.
You can't do that **** here or there so what's the point in having all the soks, unless you just enjoy having conversations with yourself.
Carry on.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 5:23 pm
I don't answer to what seems to you.Huey » 16 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ And I will stick with your stand. I have no intention of diverting this thread. That is why I continue to repost the OP. Waiting on your stand, coward.
16 Apr 2024 5:26 pm
You don't answer period.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 5:27 pm
*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, and as I pointed out... the C&P you posted was a far better explanation than your original garbage definition that you came up with on your own.
Next time cite your source... it's only fair to person that actually penned it.
Schmuck
You asserted it.Yeah, and as I pointed out.
But always gag when asked to describe how mine differs from the reference.
Yesterday it was your opinion feefees.
16 Apr 2024 5:28 pm
That's ****, Rippie.
16 Apr 2024 5:35 pm
In my opinion your original definition excluded too many factors by focusing on mortality.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑
You asserted it.
But always gag when asked to describe how mine differs from the reference.
Yesterday it was your opinion feefees.
That and your lack of an example meant that it was sub par... or "close, but not quite there".
Sorry if that hurts your fee-fees but that just the way I saw it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 5:35 pm
When are you gonna challenge @vegas to post her definition?*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, and as I pointed out... the C&P you posted was a far better explanation than your original garbage definition that you came up with on your own.
Next time cite your source... it's only fair to person that actually penned it.
Schmuck
She turned off her notifications...
16 Apr 2024 5:36 pm
I've never seen him before.*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The way I see it is, the only way soks are a problem is if they are used to spam the board, and if you spam over there or here, they will pooch kick the account out the window so... your efforts will be for naught anyway.
All the time and energy you expend making all those sok accounts is for nothing at the end of the day so, go for it. The only reason you were a pain in the *** on .org is because kfools wouldn't alter the up/downvote system to prevent you from spamming everybody's inboxes with notifications.
You can't do that **** here or there so what's the point in having all the soks, unless you just enjoy having conversations with yourself.
Carry on.
Is he one of these.....?
16 Apr 2024 5:38 pm
Yeah... he's about a dozen different posters on here at the moment... and a couple of them even argue with each other.GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Apr 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I've never seen him before.
Is he one of these.....?
The "Adolf and Eva" is almost all him.
Southern Hitler, lard, frank, Independence, Funny Guy, JAE, etc... they're all the same guy.
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 5:41 pm
And, as demonstrated, your opinion isn't well informed.*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ In my opinion your original definition excluded too many factors by focusing on mortality.
That and your lack of an example meant that it was sub par... or "close, but not quite there".
Sorry if that hurts your fee-fees but that just the way I saw it.
It was Vegas' job to provide the example.
Ask him for it...
When he complies, I'll post another.
16 Apr 2024 5:50 pm
*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The way I see it is, the only way soks are a problem is if they are used to spam the board, and if you spam over there or here, they will pooch kick the account out the window so... your efforts will be for naught anyway.
All the time and energy you expend making all those sok accounts is for nothing at the end of the day so, go for it. The only reason you were a pain in the *** on .org is because kfools wouldn't alter the up/downvote system to prevent you from spamming everybody's inboxes with notifications.
You can't do that **** here or there so what's the point in having all the soks, unless you just enjoy having conversations with yourself.
Carry on.
so explain @vegasand if you spam over there or here, they will pooch kick the account out the window so... your efforts will be for naught anyway
16 Apr 2024 5:51 pm
This dick sucker is now 78 POSTS INTO THE THREAD.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny is diverting....
I have one clear position on abortion.
Tiny has 2 or 3.
One of which mirrors my position on transgenders in HS sports.
He is still ducking the OP question.
This ******'s commitment to panty-dancing is unparalleled.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
16 Apr 2024 5:53 pm
Sounds like you are posting assignments and making demands again.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑ And, as demonstrated, your opinion isn't well informed.
It was Vegas' job to provide the example.
Ask him for it...
When he complies, I'll post another.
And now it's time for my customary "Go **** Yourself!" as a reply...
Cheerio
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 6:00 pm
*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds like you are posting assignments and making demands again.
And now it's time for my customary "Go **** Yourself!" as a reply...
Cheerio
Just do it, and I won't serve you a heapin' helpin' of your words...Sounds like you are posting assignments and making demands again.
Now THERE'S a "concession".And now it's time for my customary "Go **** Yourself!" as a reply...
I accept.
16 Apr 2024 6:06 pm
You can get back to extinguishing flaming dicks with your mouth.Cannonpointer » 16 Apr 2024, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ This dick sucker is now 78 POSTS INTO THE THREAD.
He is still ducking the OP question.
This ******'s commitment to panty-dancing is unparalleled.
viewtopic.php?p=2532195#p2532195
16 Apr 2024 6:09 pm
79.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You can get back to extinguishing flaming dicks with your mouth.
viewtopic.php?p=2532195#p2532195
Zero dignity.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
16 Apr 2024 6:13 pm
Not conceding at all.. just telling you to shove your "demands" up your ***.R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Just do it, and I won't serve you a heapin' helpin' of your words...
Now THERE'S a "concession".
I accept.
That's it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
16 Apr 2024 6:15 pm
So, your position is that abortions should allowed up to one week post birth...
Sick ****.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 2788 users online :: 13 registered, 15 bots, and 2760 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, johnedgarslowhorses, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: CensysInspect, GPTBot, DuckDuckBot, SiteLockSpider, NING, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Googlebot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot