Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm

So, your position is that abortions should allowed up to one week post birth...

Sick ****.

Learn to read

Ok at what week should abortions not be allowed?

 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:24 pm

Learn to read

The question posed was...

BuckNaked » 16 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:23 pm

Ok at what week should abortions not be allowed?

...and you answered...

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm

The week following the passing through the velvet gates.

So anytime prior to the "week following" birth, you believe abortion is acceptable.

I can read fine, and you're still a sick ****.

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:13 pm

Not conceding at all.. just telling you to shove your "demands" up your ***.

That's it.

Vegas really lived up to your expectations, didn't he...

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:33 pm

Vegas really lived up to your expectations, didn't he...

I don't worry about was Vegas does... you do enough of that for the both of us.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm

The question posed was...

...and you answered...

So anytime prior to the "week following" birth, you believe abortion is acceptable.

I can read fine, and you're still a sick ****.

I find the idea of state mandated parturition offensive.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:34 pm

I find the idea of state mandated parturition offensive.

So... kill 'em while they're gasping for air in the delivery room... or up to a week after.

Yeah, you're a sick ****.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm

So... kill 'em while they're gasping for air in the delivery room... or up to a week after.

Yeah, you're a sick ****.

I really getting tired of explaining **** to you, Rippie...

*rippy38 » 16 Apr 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:34 pm

I don't worry about was Vegas does... you do enough of that for the both of us.

You sang a different tune yesterday.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:44 pm

You sang a different tune yesterday.

And I suppose you can back that claim up somehow?

Maybe a "retelling" is in order.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 6:42 pm

I really getting tired of explaining **** to you, Rippie...

Then don't.

You suck at trying to explain **** anyway... especially when you default to spin mode.
 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm

The week following the passing through the velvet gates.

How many hours each day do you spend watching FOX?

what are velvet gates?

none unless Jim florentine is on gutfeld that dude is hilarious .    I watch msnbc to see what they’re reporting on 

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 4:50 pm

****,

The point of posting it was to remind you of the language used.

Now stop being such a bitter ****** and ask @Vegas  to post his definition.

Turning it on me. 100% accuracy. 

You bet I will, but let me remind you of the rule: You have to acknowledge that you didn't know what survivorship bias was. You never did...and probably still don't. 

Does the rule apply to me? Yes. I never broke the rule though, you have for the past 2.5 years. 

BuckNaked » 16 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm

what are velvet gates?


 

I think he's referring to his mommy's piss flaps.

R.Suave » 16 Apr 2024, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 5:23 pm

I don't answer to what seems to you.

Run coward, run.  It is what you do best.  I hate running so you do that better than I ever could, ******.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 4:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 4:50 am

Run coward, run.  It is what you do best.  I hate running so you do that better than I ever could, ******.

 

I hate running

 

You ran from the hs sports thread, then you ran here, lying.

****** is as ****** does.
 
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 5:33 am

 

You ran from the hs sports thread, then you ran here, lying.

****** is as ****** does.

I didn't run from it.  It is a different topic.  You can't seem to distinguish between thread topics.  You made your non stand clear on that thread.  If you wish to discuss that topic we can go back.  I'll bump it for you.
 

@R. Suave  

THis is the thread for the abortion discussion.  
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 6:35 am

I didn't run from it.  It is a different topic.  You can't seem to distinguish between thread topics.  You made your non stand clear on that thread.  If you wish to discuss that topic we can go back.  I'll bump it for you.

I didn't run from it.  It is a different topic

no, lying little twat.

You chose to make an issue of "stands", as I made clear when you began to divert.

After I clearly indicated that it had nothing to do with abortion, you wrote this lying OP. You couldn't control that debate, so you ran to control one here....but **** up.

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 6:54 am

@R. Suave  

THis is the thread for the abortion discussion.

I haven't invited a discussion on abortion.

Post your rule on responding to discussions you haven't invited.
 

Huey » 16 Apr 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2024, 7:10 am

@R. Suave  

BV, Since you seem to want to discuss abortion here ya go.  Post your stand on abortion, both personal and what you think the fed gov government has the authority to do and then I will post my stance. 

1...2...3...Go...........

You ever look at just one person's posts in a thread?
Snave is a hoot in this one.

FIVE pages of him never saying **** about the OP.
Why do you bother?
I get bored with the "cat chasing the light dot around the room".