Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:04 am

You ever look at just one person's posts in a thread?
Snave is a hoot in this one.

FIVE pages of him never saying **** about the OP.
Why do you bother?
I get bored with the "cat chasing the light dot around the room".

Did you look at the OP?

Did you believe it?




You're a **** idiot.
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:07 am

Did you look at the OP?

Did you believe it?

You're a **** idiot.

You trying for SIX pages of whining and deflecting is amusing.

btw
I only read the title and saw you instantly go off the path not answering.
Anything you're in is like a **** TV sitcom. Same thing over and over.
Predictable boring assholes don't come any better than you.

DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am

You trying for SIX pages of whining and deflecting is amusing.

btw
I only read the title and saw you instantly go off the path not answering.
Anything you're in is like a **** TV sitcom. Same thing over and over.
Predictable boring assholes don't come any better than you.

A) I have answered the question on the thread. Are you a liar or an idiot?
B) The OP is a cowardly lie...it was a diversion from an ongoing curbstomping.
C) Post the rule on questions.

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 6:57 am

no, lying little twat.

You chose to make an issue of "stands", as I made clear when you began to divert.

After I clearly indicated that it had nothing to do with abortion, you wrote this lying OP. You couldn't control that debate, so you ran to control one here....but **** up.

Stop with the retellings.  You have been chasing me around for months  if not years with the 2Stands BS.  But when asked to post your stand, or say what you think my stand is, you turn tail like a coward. 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 6:59 am

I haven't invited a discussion on abortion.

Post your rule on responding to discussions you haven't invited.
 


 

Keep running....
 

DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:04 am

You ever look at just one person's posts in a thread?
Snave is a hoot in this one.

FIVE pages of him never saying **** about the OP.
Why do you bother?
I get bored with the "cat chasing the light dot around the room".

Keeps him busy and from **** up other threads. 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:37 am

Stop with the retellings.  You have been chasing me around for months  if not years with the 2Stands BS.  But when asked to post your stand, or say what you think my stand is, you turn tail like a coward.

Post the words of mine which "seemed" to you to invite this diversion.

 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:41 am

Post the words of mine which "seemed" to you to invite this diversion.

 

 

Nah.  If you feel they are relevant you can do it.  

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:37 am

Keep running....

A) I've answered
B) We're about to see who is running....again.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:42 am

Nah.  If you feel they are relevant you can do it.

Of course they're relevant....they are the justification for your diversion.

Are you hating running....from your own words....again?

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:44 am

Of course they're relevant....they are the justification for your diversion.

Are you hating running....from your own words....again?

Define this particular diversion.  When you do so I will do what you are too cowardly to do.  Post my stance.  

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:41 am

Post the words of mine which "seemed" to you to invite this diversion.

I find it rather ironic that you come into a thread that was clearly created to discuss the abortion issue... proceed to talk about everything BUT abortion... and then call the thread a "diversion".

That has to be some really good **** your smoking Rico.

LOL

 
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:48 am

I find it rather ironic that you come into a thread that was clearly created to discuss the abortion issue... proceed to talk about everything BUT abortion... and then call the thread a "diversion".

That has to be some really good **** your smoking Rico.

LOL

He takes issue with the fact that I don't think the federal government has any authority to regulate abortion and I do believe it is the choice of a woman.  While I disagree with it personally.  He calls that 2Stands.  He can't differentiate between what I think the fed gov can do and my personal opinion.

@R. Suave   your turn. 
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:48 am

I find it rather ironic that you come into a thread that was clearly created to discuss the abortion issue... proceed to talk about everything BUT abortion... and then call the thread a "diversion".

That has to be some really good **** your smoking Rico.

LOL

The evidence is literally everywhere.

And you're persisting IN SPITE OF the fact that I HAVE answered the question...an answer I had to explain to you.

Now shut the **** up and ask @Vegas  to post his definition of Survivorship bias.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:59 am

He takes issue with the fact that I don't think the federal government has any authority to regulate abortion and I do believe it is the choice of a woman.  While I disagree with it personally.  He calls that 2Stands.  He can't differentiate between what I think the fed gov can do and my personal opinion.

@R. Suave   your turn.

that I don't think the federal government has any authority to regulate abortion

That's EXACTLY my position on transgenders in HS sports.

Now, for the big prize....


"Do you believe STATE governments do?"

 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:04 am

The evidence is literally everywhere.

And you're persisting IN SPITE OF the fact that I HAVE answered the question...an answer I had to explain to you.

Now shut the **** up and ask @Vegas  to post his definition of Survivorship bias.

There was no "question" to be answered Rico.

Do you see any question marks in the OP?

Nah... I didn't either.


 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:14 am

That's EXACTLY my position on transgenders in HS sports.

Now, for the big prize....


"Do you believe STATE governments do?"

 

 

Yup. ANything not covered in the Constitution belongs to the states.  Personally, as far as abortion, which is the topic, I would not vote for a state ban.  I would vote for a Roe V Wade style of law.  Acknowledge and Nod. 


But, in the trans discussion I said nothing about government intervening.  So you created a diversion. Now, if you wish to discuss the trans issue there is a thread for that.  Nod. And you are still a coward.  

ANything not covered in the Constitution belongs to the states.
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 7:24 am

A) I have answered the question on the thread. Are you a liar or an idiot?
B) The OP is a cowardly lie...it was a diversion from an ongoing curbstomping.
C) Post the rule on questions.

Being a liar and an idiot has served us both well.
In your case, nobody really expects a **** thing from you.
That only validates your NHB persona matches what you really are.

...but for some reason posters (including you) still expect stuff from me.
Huh...

Oh, this rule **** you keep tossing around pertains to your game players, not me.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:19 am

Yup. ANything not covered in the Constitution belongs to the states.  Personally, as far as abortion, which is the topic, I would not vote for a state ban.  I would vote for a Roe V Wade style of law.  Acknowledge and Nod. 

But, in the trans discussion I said nothing about government intervening.  So you created a diversion. Now, if you wish to discuss the trans issue there is a thread for that.  Nod. And you are still a coward.  

ANything not covered in the Constitution belongs to the states.

Cutting through the clutter.

You believe a state gubmint DOES have the right to regulate abortion, because that right is delegated to it.

I believe HS sports should be regulated by those authorities to which that task is EXPLICITLY delegated.

**** brick.

 

DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:24 am

Being a liar and an idiot has served us both well.
In your case, nobody really expects a **** thing from you.
That only validates your NHB persona matches what you really are.

...but for some reason posters (including you) still expect stuff from me.
Huh...

Oh, this rule **** you keep tossing around pertains to your game players, not me.

For some reason Rico thinks the "rule" thing pertains to everyone he interacts with... even when it's obvious that it only exists between himself and a couple of other members.

He asked me the other day what the "rule" was about something another, and I had no clue what he was talking about... and of course right after, he called me an idiot for not knowing what the "rule" was.

He's a strange one for sure.