Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:29 pm

You must acknowledge your words before proceeding to lie to me about what they mean.

FFS...

Nothing in my reply you quoted even remotely resembles any kind of "rule" so it's irrelevant.

Now... since you obviously CAN'T show me the "rule" you claim I made, I'm just gonna chalk it up to yet another lie from you and move on.

You are now Snave (@Deezer Shoove  ​​​​​) and no longer Rico since it fits so much better.

LOL

 
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm

Nothing in my reply you quoted even remotely resembles any kind of "rule" so it's irrelevant.

Now... since you obviously CAN'T show me the "rule" you claim I made, I'm just gonna chalk it up to yet another lie from you and move on.

You are now Snave (@Deezer Shoove  ​​​​​) and no longer Rico since it fits so much better.

LOL

Hold on...

Is that a "yes, those are my words"?
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm

You know the rule. I never broke it, you have for the past 2.5 years. 

Now: What is survivorship bias in your words only. **** your incorrect definition. 

Then you get what you want, coward.

You break your rules all the time...

Unless you're obliged to explain how, you can continue to assert that every definition I provide you is "wrong". Because you are a moron, and entirely incapable of understanding the concept (being that you are a moron, I should add)
you will never do so.

Nod, moron.
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm

You break your rules all the time...

Unless you're obliged to explain how, you can continue to assert that every definition I provide you is "wrong". Because you are a moron, and entirely incapable of understanding the concept (being that you are a moron, I should add)
you will never do so.

Nod, moron.

**** your lies and excuses.

Now: What is survivorship bias in your words only. **** your incorrect definition. 

​​​​​​​Then you get what you want, coward. 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:37 pm

Hold on...

Is that a "yes, those are my words"?

Are those quotation marks around something you are attributing to me that I never said?

What was that yiv were saying about "integrity" last night?

LOL
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:53 pm

Are those quotation marks around something you are attributing to me that I never said?

What was that yiv were saying about "integrity" last night?

LOL

I'm asking if your response is Yes or No.

Apparently that's too much.
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm

**** your lies and excuses.

Now: What is survivorship bias in your words only. **** your incorrect definition. 

Then you get what you want, coward.

I accept your concession.

(Take it up with @rippy 38  )

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:00 pm

I'm asking if your response is Yes or No.

Apparently that's too much.

More questions. Questions after questions. Hiding all the time. That's all you do. 

Post an example of you answering any question the first time...and **** that pic. It does nothing to prove that you answered the first time. 

Do it. 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm

I accept your concession.

(Take it up with @rippy 38  

More hiding. 

Now: What is survivorship bias in your words only. **** your incorrect definition. 

Then you get what you want, coward. 
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm

More questions. Questions after questions. Hiding all the time. That's all you do. 

Post an example of you answering any question the first time...and **** that pic. It does nothing to prove that you answered the first time. 

Do it.

Post an example of you answering any question the first time...

then what?

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm

then what?

Then you can demand answers to yours. Otherwise, there isn't anyone who is obligated to answer your questions when you incessantly dodge theirs. 

And if I have to explain why , then you are utterly hopeless. 


 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm

Then you can demand answers to yours. Otherwise, there isn't anyone who is obligated to answer your questions when you incessantly dodge theirs. 

And if I have to explain why , then you are utterly hopeless.

I can do that now.

I don't need some pissant's ok.

I show you one example, and you change your handle to "**** Loser"...

Deal!
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:25 pm

I can do that now.


 

You can...but you don't. You never answer questions the first time. Since 2017, not even once. 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:00 pm

I'm asking if your response is Yes or No.

Apparently that's too much.

Mis quoting someone is disingenuous.
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm

Mis quoting someone is disingenuous.

Show where you were misquoted...

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm

You can...but you don't. You never answer questions the first time. Since 2017, not even once.

Do we have a deal?
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:36 pm

Show where you were misquoted...

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 2:37 pm

Hold on...

Is that a "yes, those are my words"?

 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:36 pm

Do we have a deal?

Does it also apply to you? If so, then yes, we have a deal. If it's one sided, then **** off. 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm

 

You weren't being quoted..



 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 3:44 pm

Does it also apply to you? If so, then yes, we have a deal. If it's one sided, then **** off.

Hiding behind another question.

The terms were clear..

Do we have a deal?