Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:43 am

Rico thinks that changing sworn testimony is akin to amending a tax return or something.

He believes that Cassy repeatedly changing her "story" in no biggie because Orange Man Bad.

Don't be vague, Rippie.

On what specific point has she been impeached?

 

ROG62 » 17 Apr 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:40 am

One of the secret service officers testified that she basically lied under oath indicating none of which she said happened...

What did he say SHE lied about?


 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:49 am

Don't be vague, Rippie.

On what specific point has she been impeached?

Was I vague when I said perjury?

I don't remember stuttering.
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:49 am

Don't be vague, Rippie.

On what specific point has she been impeached?

 

 

That's funny.  The king of vagueness is complaining someone is being vague.  

THis has been posted to you many times:

The driver of former President Trump’s car on Jan. 6 disputed bombshell testimony that he tried to take control of the car, even as the witness affirmed the former president’s insistence in joining his supporters at the Capitol. 

......

“[President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all,” the unnamed driver told the committee’s investigators.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4524 ... testimony/

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:51 am

Was I vague when I said perjury?

I don't remember stuttering.

That's yet another uninformed assertion, it is not a point on which she's been impeached.

You're a **** simpleton, Rippie.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:53 am

That's funny.  The king of vagueness is complaining someone is being vague.  

THis has been posted to you many times:

The driver of former President Trump’s car on Jan. 6 disputed bombshell testimony that he tried to take control of the car, even as the witness affirmed the former president’s insistence in joining his supporters at the Capitol. 

......

“[President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all,” the unnamed driver told the committee’s investigators.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4524 ... testimony/

Who said he did?

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:55 am

Who said he did?

Read the article. 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:58 am

Read the article.

If he did that, he would have to admit he's been duped so... he won't.

He will just claim he never saw it and demand than you post it again... over and over and over...

That's his M.O.
 

Huey » 17 Apr 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:58 am

Read the article.

Run.

And remember how **** stupid you are.
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:01 am

If he did that, he would have to admit he's been duped so... he won't.

He will just claim he never saw it and demand than you post it again... over and over and over...

That's his M.O.

Do you want to answer the question from which Neverrun is running?

I thought not.

You're consistent.
 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:10 am

Do you want to answer the question from which Neverrun is running?

I thought not.

You're consistent.

I have no idea what "question" you're talking about.

You ask so many
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:01 am

If he did that, he would have to admit he's been duped so... he won't.

He will just claim he never saw it and demand than you post it again... over and over and over...

That's his M.O.
 

 

Yeah.  The next time this discussion comes up he will ask the same questions and the claim we are running.  

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:02 am

Further proof that the Jan 6th "Committee" was a total sham...

"No no Cassy... don't say that... say this instead..."

Cassidy Hutchinson’s corrected testimony on Trump and Jan. 6 released by House GOP


 
House Republicans made public on Monday a document tracking Cassidy Hutchinson‘s changes to her testimony on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol as part of the GOP’s investigation into the Democratic-led select committee on the riots following the 2020 election.

House Administration Committee’s oversight subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) released all of the documents referenced in the committee’s March 11 report on their initial findings on the House Select Committee on Jan. 6. Among the documents is a 15-page errata sheet where Hutchinson made “significant substantive changes” to her testimony, “such as conversations she originally claimed to have not been privy to or not remember.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... -released/

@R. Suave

Not all of us dutifully averted our eyes at the time

An interview transcript released on December 22, 2022, revealed that Hutchinson gave additional testimony on September 14 and September 15, 2022.[42][43] During part of this testimony, Hutchinson stated that she was pressured by Trump allies not to talk to the committee.[44][45] She also claimed that with former White House aide Alyssa Farah Griffin acting as her backchannel, she was able to conduct the interview without Passantino's knowledge, and that Passantino in fact wanted her to skirt around the committee questions. Hutchinson testified to the committee that Passantino told her, "We just want to focus on protecting the president" and "We all know you're loyal" and he would help her get "a really good job in Trump world" because "We want to keep you in the family." She also testified Meadows told her Trump knew he had lost the election.[44][45][46]


The part Loudermilk isn't saying, out loud.


 

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am

Not all of us dutifully averted our eyes at the time

An interview transcript released on December 22, 2022, revealed that Hutchinson gave additional testimony on September 14 and September 15, 2022.[42][43] During part of this testimony, Hutchinson stated that she was pressured by Trump allies not to talk to the committee.[44][45] She also claimed that with former White House aide Alyssa Farah Griffin acting as her backchannel, she was able to conduct the interview without Passantino's knowledge, and that Passantino in fact wanted her to skirt around the committee questions. Hutchinson testified to the committee that Passantino told her, "We just want to focus on protecting the president" and "We all know you're loyal" and he would help her get "a really good job in Trump world" because "We want to keep you in the family." She also testified Meadows told her Trump knew he had lost the election.[44][45][46]

The part Loudermilk isn't saying, out loud.

It wasn't "additional"... it was a retelling to fit the required narrative.

She got hugs and kisses for her efforts after the fact... and a chip in the big game too I'm sure.


 






 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:32 am

It wasn't "additional"... it was a retelling to fit the required narrative.

She got hugs and kisses for her efforts after the fact... and a chip in the big game too I'm sure.

Thanks for sharing your feefees, Ruby.

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:28 am

Not all of us dutifully averted our eyes at the time

An interview transcript released on December 22, 2022, revealed that Hutchinson gave additional testimony on September 14 and September 15, 2022.[42][43] During part of this testimony, Hutchinson stated that she was pressured by Trump allies not to talk to the committee.[44][45] She also claimed that with former White House aide Alyssa Farah Griffin acting as her backchannel, she was able to conduct the interview without Passantino's knowledge, and that Passantino in fact wanted her to skirt around the committee questions. Hutchinson testified to the committee that Passantino told her, "We just want to focus on protecting the president" and "We all know you're loyal" and he would help her get "a really good job in Trump world" because "We want to keep you in the family." She also testified Meadows told her Trump knew he had lost the election.[44][45][46]

The part Loudermilk isn't saying, out loud.

We have a "witness" who has multiple changes to her testimony and a SS agent who was actually driving the car.

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:33 am

Thanks for sharing your feefees, Ruby.

No fee-fees.

Just the facts ma'am 
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:34 am

No fee-fees.

Just the facts ma'am

Pure feefees.

I posted facts, you emoted.
 

*rippy38 » 17 Apr 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 8:02 am

Further proof that the Jan 6th "Committee" was a total sham...

"No no Cassy... don't say that... say this instead..."

Cassidy Hutchinson’s corrected testimony on Trump and Jan. 6 released by House GOP


 
House Republicans made public on Monday a document tracking Cassidy Hutchinson‘s changes to her testimony on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol as part of the GOP’s investigation into the Democratic-led select committee on the riots following the 2020 election.

House Administration Committee’s oversight subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) released all of the documents referenced in the committee’s March 11 report on their initial findings on the House Select Committee on Jan. 6. Among the documents is a 15-page errata sheet where Hutchinson made “significant substantive changes” to her testimony, “such as conversations she originally claimed to have not been privy to or not remember.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... -released/

@R. Suave

Dims lie incessantly. They will do anything, and I mean anything, no matter how illegal or unethical, to stay in power.

​​​​​​​

R.Suave » 17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am

Pure feefees.

I posted facts, you emoted.

Cassidy changed her testimony to make it more damaging against Trump after her handlers told her what to say after the fact. In a court of law that's called perjury.

Thems just the facts ma'am.

No emotion involved.