Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm

Just post your example

I don't see your admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm

Just post your example

What I want to know is... why you thought this was so important that is needed yet another thread dedicated to it?

It was already being "discussed" on at least two other thread that I know of, and maybe more.

It screams LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEE!!! on your part... which is quite pathetic really.

​​​​
 

Vegas » 19 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm

I don't see your admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.

Admit that you're a moron and I'll think about it.

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:38 pm

Admit that you're a moron and I'll think about it.

I don't se an admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm

What I want to know is... why you thought this was so important that is needed yet another thread dedicated to it?

It was already being "discussed" on at least two other thread that I know of, and maybe more.

It screams LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEE!!! on your part... which is quite pathetic really.

​​​​

Ask yourself why you're here.

Vegas » 19 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm

I don't se an admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.

I don't se an admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.


Writes itself.

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm

Ask yourself why you're here.

Boredom mostly... and I love hearing you squeal.

LOL


 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm

Boredom mostly... and I love hearing you squeal.

LOL

Unrewarding pursuit, I'm sure.

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 2:54 pm

I don't se an admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.

Writes itself.

Yes, it does. So chop chop. 

As always, you have to copy someone else , because you have no thoughts of your own. 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm

I don't think I have ever seen anyone try as hard as he does to not be wrong, and fail so miserably in his efforts at the same time.

LOL 

Then doing the double down....  
 

Vegas » 19 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm

Yes, it does. So chop chop. 

As always, you have to copy someone else , because you have no thoughts of your own.

So post your definition of Survivorship bias....to prove that you can think.

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm

I don't think I have ever seen anyone try as hard as he does to not be wrong, and fail so miserably in his efforts at the same time.

LOL

How do we know he's wrong?


 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 5:12 pm

So post your definition of Survivorship bias....to prove that you can think.

I don't see your admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies. 

Vegas » 19 Apr 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:22 pm

I don't see your admission. Thus, rule, idiot. **** your ignorance or 3k greenies.

I never believed you could think...

No evidence....

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm

After years of dodging, the forum's foremost moron and coward, will now entertain us by setting his hair on fire...

Here is my definition of Survivorship bias -

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

@Vegas  

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/tra ... ting-plot/
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:27 pm

I never believed you could think...

No evidence....

I still don't see an admission. 

What is survivorship bias in your words? And **** your incorrect definition. 



1. After all the evidence I gave to disprove his definition, he will now pretend that I never did. Thus, he will demand I repost everything.  

R. Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm

After years of dodging, the forum's foremost moron and coward, will now entertain us by setting his hair on fire...


Here is my definition of Survivorship bias -

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.


@Vegas  
 
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VsifANR96s

Your title sparked something I heard decades ago.

You really won't try to think using your own brain navigating time mutually and equally evolving within the moment here existing is a series parallel position of spontaneously you and everyone else simply adapting to this perpetual balancing outcome where existing is limited to adapting as displaced since arriving ancestrally here so far.

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 12:57 pm

You can shut the **** up now.

KILL YOURSELF NOW ASKHOLIO
 
 

Vegas » 21 Apr 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2024, 9:24 am

I still don't see an admission. 

What is survivorship bias in your words? And **** your incorrect definition. 

1. After all the evidence I gave to disprove his definition, he will now pretend that I never did. Thus, he will demand I repost everything.

1. "I bet you think...."

2. "I might confuse it with...."

That proves you're an idiot

R.Suave » 21 Apr 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2024, 11:14 am

1. "I bet you think...."

2. "I might confuse it with...."

That proves you're an idiot

WTF? I am not going to even ask.  I have no idea what this is nor do I care to know. 

I don't see an admission. 
Now, let's try this again. What is survivorship bias in your own words. And **** your incorrect definition.