Liberal Forum

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:12 pm

did the rules PREVENT people voting for trump? if so how?

If the election was rigged , then would it matter if the voted for Trump or not? 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:15 pm

If the election was rigged , then would it matter if the voted for Trump or not?

but but the new rules were proof the election was rigged.

 

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:47 pm

but but the new rules were proof the election was rigged.

What do you mean? Expand. 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:49 pm

What do you mean? Expand.

////////////////////////Verifiable FACTS: 

1)  Democrats changed election laws before 2020 to make cheating easier !///////////////////////////////////

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:54 pm

////////////////////////Verifiable FACTS: 

1)  Democrats changed election laws before 2020 to make cheating easier !///////////////////////////////////

Not surprised. 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm

Not surprised.

 and what prevented people from voting for trump?

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 1:23 pm

 and what prevented people from voting for trump?

Nothing. I don't know what law this is. My point is that if it was rigged, then it wouldn't matter if everybody voted for Trump. 

https://coloradosun.com/2021/10/15/eric ... r-hearing/

Notice that the [[[JEW WORLD ORDER]] did not dare convict Joe Oltmann with "defamation" of Eric Coomer.
They did their best to silence him though.
Any wonder why Dominion immediately fired Eric Coomer and scrubbed his identity clean off their web site as soon as Joe Oltmann's sworn testimony about Coomer's conference call with ANTIFA broke...?
Oltman testimony claims that Coomer told ANTIFA.."Don't worry...there's no **** way that I'm going to let Trump win..!"
 

Any wonder why the [[[JWO/MSM]]] hid this story from the National News Feed...?

https://youtu.be/9vUUHFCTRjw?si=2leP4K4BlfOupp4j Did you conspire to overturn an election? Oh, no. I’d never do that. Did you crash into the building? No, I never did that.
9
Reply

@guysmith8662
2 years ago
"Trump won't win... I made f***ing sure of it" Eric Coomer, VP Dominion Systems Strategy and Security
247
Reply

9 replies

@urhuckleberry24
2 years ago
The arresting officers should make a public statement now that they are not suicidal.
249
Reply

3 replies

@virginiacraven3327
2 years ago
He's under a lot of pressure?? Look what he's put our country through.
237
Reply

6 replies

@finscreenname
2 years ago
Someone needs to call that police department and ask if they give these options to all drunk drivers that drive through a building and leaves?
111
Reply

7 replies

@SneedsFeed6
2 years ago (edited)
3 pm. Classic Eric. You'll eventually end up in a real court room for treason
57
Reply

7 replies

@ahroar
2 years ago (edited)
He has proven himself to be a serial liar. And the cops were actually pretty nice to give him an opportunity to make things right. "Under a lot of stress," which he should be..... Trying to keep up with all the lies will do that to you

I'm downloading this video in case YouTube decides to delete it for "dangerous misinformation" or "supporting terrorism." 
5
 
 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 1:42 pm

Nothing. I don't know what law this is. My point is that if it was rigged, then it wouldn't matter if everybody voted for Trump.

saying   the voting rules were changed was a big 'proof' the election was rigged.









e

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm

saying   the voting rules were changed was a big 'proof' the election was rigged.

e

Yes, but I haven't read up on that. Do you believe it was rigged?

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:11 pm

Yes, but I haven't read up on that. Do you believe it was rigged?

everyone had an equal chance to vote for who ever they wanted to.
 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:11 pm

Yes, but I haven't read up on that. Do you believe it was rigged?

it was only on the news 24 7 for years/

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:15 pm

everyone had equal chance to vote for who ever they wanted to.

That doesn't answer my question. 

And you still haven't addressed what I already said three times. It could have been rigged other ways. Behind the scenes. So why would it matter who voted for who if it was rigged?

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm

it was only on the news 24 7 for years/

I don't watch the news in this country. Nobody should. You shouldn't either.

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm

That doesn't answer my question. 

And you still haven't addressed what I already said three times. It could have been rigged other ways. Behind the scenes. So why would it matter who voted for who if it was rigged?

what other ways are you talking about?

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:17 pm

what other ways are you talking about?

I have a rule. If people don't answer my questions, then I don't answer theirs. Fair is fair. 

Go back, read my questions, and provide an answer. Then I will answer yours.

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:17 pm

I don't watch the news in this country. Nobody should. You shouldn't either.

apparently you should tell that to trump------ rump v. Wis. Elecs. Comm’n (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020) https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsu ... -elections    – The district court dismissed Trump’s claim that Wisconsin officials violated his rights under the Electors Clause because said officials allegedly issued guidance on state election statutes that deviated significantly from the requirements of Wisconsin’s election statutes. First, the court found that interpretations of election administration rules do not fall under the meaning of “Manner” in the Electors Clause. Moreover, even if “Manner” were read so broadly, the defendants had acted consistently with, and as expressly authorized by, the Wisconsin Legislature; their issued guidance did not significantly or materially depart from legislative direction. Thus, there was no violation of the Electors Clause. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion on Dec. 24, 2020. Trump filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 30, 2020 along with a motion for expedited consideration, and the court denied Trump’s motion to expedite on January 11.
 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:21 pm

I have a rule. If people don't answer my questions, then I don't answer theirs. Fair is fair. 

Go back, read my questions, and provide an answer. Then I will answer yours.

fake electors, now that is election fraud.

jerrab » 28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm

saying   the voting rules were changed was a big 'proof' the election was rigged.

e

Do you feel good knowing that Eric Coomer was in charge of our Nation's Election Security...?
Why are Dominion Voting Machines "field programmable...?
Would you have any faith in a credit card system that could be manipulated by a service technician working by himself in a server closet that's tied into a global credit card  network...?
Of course not.
The courts can't deny that the Dominion Machines ARE field programmable.. but nobody wonders why they need to have that feature. A feature that makes cheating possible.
The best the Excuse Makers  can offer is say that they haven't seen any evidence that field programmability was ever used to skew election results.
Several batches of votes were posted during the wee hours of the morning after Election night with identical ratios all for Biden and the courts can't see any evidence of fraud.