Liberal Forum

Given the following facts: 
1. Biden's approval has been embarrassingly low for months. In fact, the last time it was over 50% was in July/2021. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/pre ... biden.aspx

2. He has allowed more illegals across the border than any other president in history. 
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... d-of-2023/

3. He is senile who molested who his own daughter in the shower...which most progressives don't care. 

4. As of Feb/2024, only 35% of the world is satisfied with the position in the world today. In other words, our senile pedo made us a joke to the world. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/116350/pos ... nfavorably.

5. The guy can't stop brushing up against 11 yr old girls, falling down, and bumbling his words incoherently. 


Question: If Biden still wins, especially if he takes the popular vote, will you at least consider the possibility of fraud in 2020? 

The answer: But...but...but....Trump!

Four more years.. pause...

 

https://youtu.be/rY5Qp1Yl-0g

Jantje_Smit » 27 Apr 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 10:13 am

Four more years.. pause...

 

https://youtu.be/rY5Qp1Yl-0g

"pause."       

Vegas » 27 Apr 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 10:24 am

"pause."     

If they didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.     

 
 
 

Vegas » 27 Apr 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 9:44 am

Given the following facts: 
1. Biden's approval has been embarrassingly low for months. In fact, the last time it was over 50% was in July/2021. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/pre ... biden.aspx

2. He has allowed more illegals across the border than any other president in history. 
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... d-of-2023/

3. He is senile who molested who his own daughter in the shower...which most progressives don't care. 

4. As of Feb/2024, only 35% of the world is satisfied with the position in the world today. In other words, our senile pedo made us a joke to the world. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/116350/pos ... nfavorably.

5. The guy can't stop brushing up against 11 yr old girls, falling down, and bumbling his words incoherently. 


Question: If Biden still wins, especially if he takes the popular vote, will you at least consider the possibility of fraud in 2020? 

The answer: But...but...but....Trump!

Facts are predetermined conclusions ancestrally used each generation gap justifying human behavior until extinction happens created by speculating life isn't self evident evolving while reproductively here one at a time or there would not be reasonable doubt what life does evolving forward here now.

When you take a stance or support someone, there can be a clash of viewpoints.
As you make your case, most of the time having people who agree with you speaking up is welcomed.

However, every so often there can be someone who joins in on your behalf
who you find embarrassing, ridiculous, etc.

I have told people more than once to not "help". Even so far as to say, "Shut the **** up."
It can be awkward and seem ungracious, but avoiding the appearance of a quasi-camaraderie is worth it.

Kinda dumb example:
You don't like Mexican food. Then a known racist is agreeing with you with a bit too much "enthusiasm".

I see Biden as that sore topic liberal people are afraid to delve into too deeply.
They'd have people they hate agreeing with them about his flaws.
Then the liberal would have to tell them to shut the **** up about a topic on which they totally agree.

I mean, how could a liberal be seen agreeing awkwardly with a non-liberal?
Alinsky Cultists would not like that ****.
So, they sit in silence or lie.
 

DeezerShoove » 27 Apr 2024, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 5:06 pm

When you take a stance or support someone, there can be a clash of viewpoints.
As you make your case, most of the time having people who agree with you speaking up is welcomed.

However, every so often there can be someone who joins in on your behalf
who you find embarrassing, ridiculous, etc.

I have told people more than once to not "help". Even so far as to say, "Shut the **** up."
It can be awkward and seem ungracious, but avoiding the appearance of a quasi-camaraderie is worth it.

Kinda dumb example:
You don't like Mexican food. Then a known racist is agreeing with you with a bit too much "enthusiasm".

I see Biden as that sore topic liberal people are afraid to delve into too deeply.
They'd have people they hate agreeing with them about his flaws.
Then the liberal would have to tell them to shut the **** up about a topic on which they totally agree.

I mean, how could a liberal be seen agreeing awkwardly with a non-liberal?
Alinsky Cultists would not like that ****.
So, they sit in silence or lie.

+1

we are dug in

and “they” love it

if we finally figure out that we have way more in common with each other than we do with the oligarchs 

“they” are ****

it that’s not ever gonna happen 
 

DeezerShoove » 27 Apr 2024, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 5:06 pm

When you take a stance or support someone, there can be a clash of viewpoints.
As you make your case, most of the time having people who agree with you speaking up is welcomed.

However, every so often there can be someone who joins in on your behalf
who you find embarrassing, ridiculous, etc.

I have told people more than once to not "help". Even so far as to say, "Shut the **** up."
It can be awkward and seem ungracious, but avoiding the appearance of a quasi-camaraderie is worth it.

Kinda dumb example:
You don't like Mexican food. Then a known racist is agreeing with you with a bit too much "enthusiasm".

I see Biden as that sore topic liberal people are afraid to delve into too deeply.
They'd have people they hate agreeing with them about his flaws.
Then the liberal would have to tell them to shut the **** up about a topic on which they totally agree.

I mean, how could a liberal be seen agreeing awkwardly with a non-liberal?
Alinsky Cultists would not like that ****.
So, they sit in silence or lie.

All of this true, except they don't have to lie once they are in the voting booth. The libs who are too embarrassed to say they won't vote for Biden are not under any pressure, because nobody knows what their vote is. However, if they don't vote Biden, and he ends up winning, then...well. 

Vegas » 27 Apr 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 9:44 am

Given the following facts: 
1. Biden's approval has been embarrassingly low for months. In fact, the last time it was over 50% was in July/2021. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/pre ... biden.aspx

2. He has allowed more illegals across the border than any other president in history. 
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... d-of-2023/

3. He is senile who molested who his own daughter in the shower...which most progressives don't care. 

4. As of Feb/2024, only 35% of the world is satisfied with the position in the world today. In other words, our senile pedo made us a joke to the world. 
https://news.gallup.com/poll/116350/pos ... nfavorably.

5. The guy can't stop brushing up against 11 yr old girls, falling down, and bumbling his words incoherently. 

Question: If Biden still wins, especially if he takes the popular vote, will you at least consider the possibility of fraud in 2020? 

The answer: But...but...but....Trump!

you ask a question based on five "facts".

1.  what the **** does Joe Biden's approval rating in the 13th quarter of his presidency have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
2.  In the list of presidents and illegal crossings, Biden may  be #1, but Trump is #2.  And what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
3.  Not a fact.  She has stated that she did not write that "quote" from her diary.  And what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
4.  35% of AMERICA - not the world - is satisfied with the US position in the world today as if Biden had **** all to do with Hamas invading Israel or Putin invading Ukraine, and what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020? 
5..  Not a fact... an opinion.  I have a similar opinion of Trump, but again what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?

You wouldn't know a fact if it sucked your dick.

Biden beat the clown's *** like a **** drum.... with the help of a very active and very well focused DNC driven GOTV effort designed to maximize mail in voting participation and that ran circles around the RNC's pathetic, "hey, be sure and vote on election day" schtick.

 

maineman » 27 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm

3.  Not a fact.  She has stated that she did not write that "quote" from her diary.

Here is maineman  once again trying to defend the honor of this child molester.
 
 
 

Mrkelly » 27 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm

+1

we are dug in

and “they” love it

if we finally figure out that we have way more in common with each other than we do with the oligarchs 

“they” are ****

it that’s not ever gonna happen

Sad but true.
I've had posters here in NHB (one quite recently) get into my **** because I didn't take a firm stand.
I don't on many things after all. There's a few, but in general, I'm not a black 'n' white kind of guy.

Even the Oval Orifice... I do try to see something worthwhile and give the **** a chance.

Bammy was a tester, for sure. But I gave him a chance and waited to see.
Then he crammed Bammycare down our throats while the gettin' was good.
He had his two year window (owning congress) which he pretty much knew he would lose.
He did. But rushed **** through that nobody read. They openly admitted it.
So, he became a complete asshole in my book.

Trump actually surprised me. He wasn't as **** as people predicted.
So, they unleashed a disease and mail-in cheat-votes. Slapped him out of the Orifice.
He called the press liars. They are, but didn't like that.  

Biden was the first guy in a long time I gave no chance to "grow into the job".
**** him right from the beginning. A goddamned career, do-nothing **** idiot.
He has done not-one-thing in his "career" and continued the trend into his presidency.
**** loser piece of ****. MSM...**** you too.

What fraud?

Squatchman » 27 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm

What fraud?

What use is a voter fraud organization if there is no fraud?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0
 

Jantje_Smit » 27 Apr 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 10:13 am

Four more years.. pause...

 

https://youtu.be/rY5Qp1Yl-0g

 
 
 
 

DeezerShoove » 27 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm

Sad but true.
I've had posters here in NHB (one quite recently) get into my **** because I didn't take a firm stand.
I don't on many things after all. There's a few, but in general, I'm not a black 'n' white kind of guy.

Even the Oval Orifice... I do try to see something worthwhile and give the **** a chance.

Bammy was a tester, for sure. But I gave him a chance and waited to see.
Then he crammed Bammycare down our throats while the gettin' was good.
He had his two year window (owning congress) which he pretty much knew he would lose.
He did. But rushed **** through that nobody read. They openly admitted it.
So, he became a complete asshole in my book.

Trump actually surprised me. He wasn't as **** as people predicted.
So, they unleashed a disease and mail-in cheat-votes. Slapped him out of the Orifice.
He called the press liars. They are, but didn't like that.  

Biden was the first guy in a long time I gave no chance to "grow into the job".
**** him right from the beginning. A goddamned career, do-nothing **** idiot.
He has done not-one-thing in his "career" and continued the trend into his presidency.
**** loser piece of ****. MSM...**** you too.

 
 

maineman » 27 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm

you ask a question based on five "facts".

1.  what the **** does Joe Biden's approval rating in the 13th quarter of his presidency have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
2.  In the list of presidents and illegal crossings, Biden may  be #1, but Trump is #2.  And what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
3.  Not a fact.  She has stated that she did not write that "quote" from her diary.  And what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?
4.  35% of AMERICA - not the world - is satisfied with the US position in the world today as if Biden had **** all to do with Hamas invading Israel or Putin invading Ukraine, and what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020? 
5..  Not a fact... an opinion.  I have a similar opinion of Trump, but again what does THAT have to do with the possibility of fraud in 2020?

You wouldn't know a fact if it sucked your dick.

Biden beat the clown's *** like a **** drum.... with the help of a very active and very well focused DNC driven GOTV effort designed to maximize mail in voting participation and that ran circles around the RNC's pathetic, "hey, be sure and vote on election day" schtick.

For God sakes Mainman. I didn't think that I needed to spell this out. The point being made is that given this list, would it make a lick of sense that Biden could win a second term? If he does, then it would make sense that 2024 could be rigged. Thereby, making perfect sense that 2020 was rigged. 

The point wasn't that any number on that list had anything to do with 2020. 


I guess I needed to dumb it down.

Squatchman » 27 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm

What fraud?

I see that I have to dumb **** down for you also. Go see what I wrote to Mainman. I am not repeat it. 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 10:51 am

For God sakes Mainman. I didn't think that I needed to spell this out. The point being made is that given this list, would it make a lick of sense that Biden could win a second term? If he does, then it would make sense that 2024 could be rigged. Thereby, making perfect sense that 2020 was rigged. 

The point wasn't that any number on that list had anything to do with 2020. 

I guess I needed to dumb it down.

what does "GIVEN THE FOLLOWING FACTS" mean?

1.  I pointed out that your "facts" weren't facts and that you have no **** idea what facts are.
2.  After you posted your five non-factual "facts. you then immediately pose this  "Question: If Biden still wins, especially if he takes the popular vote, will you at least consider the possibility of fraud in 2020?"  And now you want to try and tap dance away and say that the list of five non-facts had NOTHING to do with the question that immediately followed them?  **** you.

YOu can't possibly dumb it down any dumber than it was... it was a pack of innuendo and lies posing as "facts" that we were supposed to take as GIVEN when we answered your **** question.  It was, on its very face, stupid, and hyper-partisan designed to generate a lot of heat and very little light 

By your non-factual "facts" we all get it that you don't like Joe Biden.  And, as old and past his prime as Joe might seem, many many people view Trump as even worse.  And when you toss in a criminal felony conviction or two, a whole lot MORE people will find him to be unacceptable.  2024 will be an election where people hold their noses and vote for the candidate they believe can carry us through until the generational-changing election that undoubtedly will happen in 2028.   2024 won't be rigged.  2020 wasn't rigged.  We out-worked the republicans.  We changed our GOTV model and went all in on mail-in voting and having that be the drumbeat message for phone banks for MONTHS prior to the election.  And every single woman we call we will remind them that Trump bragged about making Roe go away and look what came from that.  If you liked Roe, you must vote for Joe.  And that is exactly what we're planning on doing starting this summer.

Vegas » 28 Apr 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 10:58 am

I see that I have to dumb **** down for you also. Go see what I wrote to Mainman. I am not repeat it.[sic]

Is English your second language, you illiterate fool?
 

maineman » 28 Apr 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2024, 11:22 am

what does "GIVEN THE FOLLOWING FACTS" mean?

1.  I pointed out that your "facts" weren't facts and that you have no **** idea what facts are.
2.  After you posted your five non-factual "facts. you then immediately pose this  "Question: If Biden still wins, especially if he takes the popular vote, will you at least consider the possibility of fraud in 2020?"  And now you want to try and tap dance away and say that the list of five non-facts had NOTHING to do with the question that immediately followed them?  **** you.

YOu can't possibly dumb it down any dumber than it was... it was a pack of innuendo and lies posing as "facts" that we were supposed to take as GIVEN when we answered your **** question.  It was, on its very face, stupid, and hyper-partisan designed to generate a lot of heat and very little light 

By your non-factual "facts" we all get it that you don't like Joe Biden.  And, as old and past his prime as Joe might seem, many many people view Trump as even worse.  And when you toss in a criminal felony conviction or two, a whole lot MORE people will find him to be unacceptable.  2024 will be an election where people hold their noses and vote for the candidate they believe can carry us through until the generational-changing election that undoubtedly will happen in 2028.   2024 won't be rigged.  2020 wasn't rigged.  We out-worked the republicans.  We changed our GOTV model and went all in on mail-in voting and having that be the drumbeat message for phone banks for MONTHS prior to the election.  And every single woman we call we will remind them that Trump bragged about making Roe go away and look what came from that.  If you liked Roe, you must vote for Joe.  And that is exactly what we're planning on doing starting this summer.

1. The hell they weren't. Did you deliberately miss the links?

2. They were facts, per the research I posted. 

I tell you what. Since you are hell bent on thinking they were not facts, how about you provide a case against the Pew research and Gallop polls that I cited. It's not like I took those from FOX news.