what a stupid thing to ask.jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ did they go to poland and other countries and dig up the bodies to do a body count?
Totally irrelevent.jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ the nazis murdered people in ukraine poland etc. what body count do they deny? in each country.
is she american?GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Apr 2024, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Totally irrelevent.
millions of people have died in wars to defend that woman's right to disagree with the holocaust narrative.
[I shouldn't expect a 70 IQ Negro to understand that though] .
GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Apr 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ what a stupid thing to ask.
You advocate having people arrested for openly disagreeing with what they were taught to believe.
This makes YOU THE TOTALITARIAN AND ME THE ONE WHO REPECTS OUR NATURAL BORN RIGHTS.
Of course I am the one who takes my oath seriously and you are the one who never served.
NOPE. not the same at all.

NOPE. not the same at all.jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ is she american?
kneeling is free speech that trump denied.
he said they should be fired for exercising their to right free speech.GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Apr 2024, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ NOPE. not the same at all.
Trump never said those players should be arrested and thrown in prison.
So stop lying.
If Trump had those players thrown in prison for a year, then yeah, you would have something.
Get a clue.
jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ he said they should be fired for exercising their to right free speech.
Totally irrelevent.jerrab » Today, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:03 pm
the nazis murdered people in ukraine poland etc. what body count do they deny? in each country.
let europe worry about europe-------------------GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Apr 2024, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Totally irrelevent.
Trump NEVER said the players should be thrown in prison.
millions of people have died in wars to defend that woman's right to disagree with the holocaust narrative.
[I shouldn't expect a 70 IQ Negro to understand that though] .
///////is when you deconstruct the 1st amendment to fit your disgusting mentality, what criteria will you be using to select what is free speech and what isn't?---------------------Vegas » 30 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know if Jews ever tried to pull that **** here in America, but they were successful in other countries. I wouldn't be surprised if they have tried...or are even still trying.
My question is how do some nations select what should be free speech and what shouldn't? Yes, sometimes free speech hurts. I get that. For example, NAMBLA the group that @Bidencrimefamily , @R. Suave (he will see it when he returns), and many other lefties belong to, are protected under the 1st amendment to distribute their literature. The same lit that provides instructions on how to groom little boys. Groups like this are evil. But they are protected under the 1st amendment like every one else.
Eventually, the progressives will have 100% control of this country. It's already starting. So my question to you progressives is when you deconstruct the 1st amendment to fit your disgusting mentality, what criteria will you be using to select what is free speech and what isn't?
GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ let europe worry about europe-------------------
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ ... 043_EN.pdf
The 2008 Framework Decision requires, among other things, that certain forms of hate speech constitute criminal offences across the EU and are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties. Public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group, defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin, is thus punishable.
and it is my right to tell how I feel, you are the dumbest person who ever lived.GHETTOBLASTER » 01 May 2024, 1:01 am » wrote: ↑ GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:31 pm
Questioning the holocaust narrative is not by any stretch of the imagination "HATE SPEECH" or "incitement to violence".
Only some Jew World Order brainwashed piece of **** like you buys into that totalitarian ideology.
Secondly, if I want to say that you are a mother **** piece of **** traitor who deserves to have your teeth kicked in...that is my God given right.
If I want to say that ****** are the least intelligent race, that is my God given right too.
Now go run off and have a good cry you totalitarian piece of **** *** bitch.
GHETTOBLASTER » 01 May 2024, 1:01 am » wrote: ↑ GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:31 pm
Questioning the holocaust narrative is not by any stretch of the imagination "HATE SPEECH" or "incitement to violence".
Only some Jew World Order brainwashed piece of **** like you buys into that totalitarian ideology.
Secondly, if I want to say that you are a mother **** piece of **** traitor who deserves to have your teeth kicked in...that is my God given right.
If I want to say that ****** are the least intelligent race, that is my God given right too.
Now go run off and have a good cry you totalitarian piece of **** *** bitch.
Vegas » 30 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know if Jews ever tried to pull that **** here in America, but they were successful in other countries. I wouldn't be surprised if they have tried...or are even still trying.
My question is how do some nations select what should be free speech and what shouldn't? Yes, sometimes free speech hurts. I get that. For example, NAMBLA the group that @Bidencrimefamily , @R. Suave (he will see it when he returns), and many other lefties belong to, are protected under the 1st amendment to distribute their literature. The same lit that provides instructions on how to groom little boys. Groups like this are evil. But they are protected under the 1st amendment like every one else.
Eventually, the progressives will have 100% control of this country. It's already starting. So my question to you progressives is when you deconstruct the 1st amendment to fit your disgusting mentality, what criteria will you be using to select what is free speech and what isn't?
I quit watching "the news" many years ago.impartialobserver » 30 Apr 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I find that life is so much better if I simply do not watch cable news or local news. If it directly affects me then I research it and go from there. Facebook, I use this solely as a means of information about rock bands, breweries, and a very select group of friends and family. Instead of watching news and digesting media.. I hang out with my kids.. Guess which is more rewarding?
jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 10:13 pm » wrote: ↑ ///////is when you deconstruct the 1st amendment to fit your disgusting mentality, what criteria will you be using to select what is free speech and what isn't?---------------------
yep that is trump all over
jerrab » 30 Apr 2024, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ he said they should be fired for exercising their to right free speech.
No, a narrative does not have to be true in order to be a narrative.jerrab » 01 May 2024, 1:42 am » wrote: ↑ with no proof , no body count, it is not a narrative but just a dreamed up lie. narratives require truth or else they are just down right lies.

HEY EINSTEIN....still looking for video to prove [[[THE NARRATIVE]]] that MAGA murdered 5 Capitol Cops ...?jerrab » 01 May 2024, 1:39 am » wrote: ↑ and it is my right to tell how I feel, you are the dumbest person who ever lived.
